<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Balance of Power</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/industry-voices/archive/2011/12/13/balance-of-power.aspx</link><description>The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals recently called a high-profile turf contest between the West Virginia Racing Commission and the Charles Town racetrack. The stakes were for the control of horse racing.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Balance of Power</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/industry-voices/archive/2011/12/13/balance-of-power.aspx#194099</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:194099</guid><dc:creator>tenmd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps we should ask John Veitch how he feels about &amp;quot;an unchecked, unreviewable (virtually absolute) power...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And while on the subject, I must say that I find it quite ironic that John Veitch, who has always been known for his fair and equitable judgements, be dismissed in such an unfair and underhanded manner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=194099" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>