<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>One Horse, Two Scandals</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/keeping-pace/archive/2016/12/27/one-horse-two-scandals.aspx</link><description>Not that the horse had a choice, but Masochistic now holds the dubious distinction of being the center of not one, but two racing scandals. BloodHorse headlines this week documented the recommendation by the California Horse Racing Board Dec. 19 that</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Sal&amp;#8217;s Suddenly Surfacing Post Christmas Post | Holy Bull</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/keeping-pace/archive/2016/12/27/one-horse-two-scandals.aspx#648252</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 14:39:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:648252</guid><dc:creator>Sal’s Suddenly Surfacing Post Christmas Post | Holy Bull</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Sal&amp;amp;#8217;s Suddenly Surfacing Post Christmas Post | Holy Bull&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648252" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>