<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en"><title type="html">MarketWatch Blog</title><subtitle type="html">Insight for investors into the business of breeding, selling, and racing Thoroughbreds</subtitle><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/atom.aspx</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/atom.aspx" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="3.1.20917.1142">Community Server</generator><updated>2014-01-17T08:00:00Z</updated><entry><title>Defining the Polarized Market</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/07/05/defining-the-polarized-market.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/07/05/defining-the-polarized-market.aspx</id><published>2017-07-05T15:42:00Z</published><updated>2017-07-05T15:42:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;By Eric Mitchell&amp;nbsp; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Much has been written about the polarization of the Thoroughbred commercial market.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Within subgroups of sale horses by quality, we've seen a growing divide between what's paid for those perceived as the most desirable and those perceived as the next-best. But there is a broader polarization, too, which is beginning to put additional pressure on breeders as they make mating decisions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article analyzes&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;bigger picture and changes seen since 2013, when the chasm began to widen&amp;nbsp;more appreciably between the higher and lower ends of the commercial market as determined by stud fee. It also&amp;nbsp;identifies&amp;nbsp;the borderline territory within which successful sales have become tougher to achieve.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The upper end of the Thoroughbred market is always the preferable place to be. Overall, higher prices are reflective of higher quality, and higher quality as a whole means more success at the races and in the breeding shed. Most adhere to the adage: "It costs the same to feed a cheap horse as an expensive horse," and pay for as much quality as one can afford.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Breeders and pinhookers have adjusted as buyers focus&amp;nbsp;on the upper tier. Between 2013-16, the number of sales of yearlings bred on stud fees of $75,000 and up grew&amp;nbsp;from 480 in 2013 to 655 in 2016. The percentage of profitable horses within this range has remained fairly steady, falling between 31%-45% for yearlings bred on stud fees of $100,000 or up and between 28%-45% for yearlings bred on fees in the $75,000-$99,999 range.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Return on investment at the top end did take a hit in 2016, falling from a recent high of 40% in 2014 to 14% in 2016 for yearlings bred on six-figure stud fees. The $75,000-$99,999 range also declined from 51% in 2013 to 3.1% in 2016. This may be an indication of the "all or nothing" buying behavior mentioned previously.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These declines in ROI, however, pale in comparison to what happened with yearlings bred on a fee in the $10,000-$14,999 range. The percent of profitable yearlings has not changed much, fluctuating between 20-26% over the past four years, but ROI has plunged from a&amp;nbsp;losing 1% in 2013 to a declining 36% in 2016. Commercial performance is more grim&amp;nbsp;among horses bred on fees under $10,000, but the relatively poor ROIs and low percent of profitable sales has not changed much since 2013.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The borderline of positive territory in the commercial market now appears to be the $15,000-$24,999 stud fee range. The yearling representing this range generated a 28% ROI with 32% profitable in 2013. This tier's performance in 2016 was a 1.4% ROI with 30% profitable. This segment of the market is not insignificant, having accounted for 24% of yearlings offered in 2016.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tough decisions for breeders lie ahead.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Before, sires were marketed by their average earnings per start or per starter," said Tony Lacy with Four Star Sales. "Now it is all about sales. There is an intersect between sales and racing, but it is very tricky to find that sweet spot right now." &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MWAnalysisPolarizationChart.jpg" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MWAnalysisPolarizationChart.jpg" width="300" vspace="" border="" align="" hspace="" height=""&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648521" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Yearling Sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Yearling+Sales/default.aspx" /><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="Eric Mitchell" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Eric+Mitchell/default.aspx" /><category term="Thoroughbred yearling sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Thoroughbred+yearling+sales/default.aspx" /><category term="polarized market" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/polarized+market/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Bull Market for Juveniles Driven by Quality</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/04/11/Bull-Market-for-Juveniles-Driven-by-Quality.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/04/11/Bull-Market-for-Juveniles-Driven-by-Quality.aspx</id><published>2017-04-11T13:16:00Z</published><updated>2017-04-11T13:16:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;By Ron Mitchell &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;Driven by the top of the market, the first four juvenile sales of 2017 resulted in a 12.2% increase in gross receipts, a 15.8% cumulative increase in average, and a decline in buy-backs as the marketplace becomes more polarized.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;According to &lt;i&gt;BloodHorse MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; data, the Fasig-Tipton Gulfstream, Ocala Breeders'&amp;nbsp;Sales Co.'s March sale, and April auctions conducted by Barretts in California and the Texas Thoroughbred Association have combined for $90.4 million in sales, with 489 horses sold, compared with $78.2 million for 429 sold at the four auctions in 2016.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;The 169 not sold this year from 658 offered represents a 25.7% buy-back rate; last year, the RNA rate was 27.7% as 165 of the 594 through the ring went unsold for the first four 2-year-old sales.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;A breakdown by price deciles shows 47 horses sold for $500,000 or above &lt;/span&gt;this year&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;, with only three RNAs in that price range. By comparison, there were 28 such transactions during the first four&amp;nbsp;juvenile sales of 2016, with three buy-backs at that level.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;The $36.7 million grossed by the juveniles sold at the top of the market represents 40.5% of gross receipts for the four auctions, compared with $21.4 million, or 27.3% of the total, at the same juncture a year ago.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;There have been eight horses sold in excess of seven figures, compared with six a year ago.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;At the other end, of 382 offered&amp;nbsp;within the sold or bought-back price range up to $99,999, the 136 that did not sell represented a 35.6% RNA rate. Last year, 113, or 39.6% of the 285 lower-end horses, were bought back.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;Bloodstock agent Pete Bradley, who is active as a buyer and seller at major 2-year-olds in training sales, said the top of the market is being driven by an infusion of new buyers. He estimated seven or eight newcomers, either acting on their own behalf or through agents, have impacted the upper end so far this year.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"That is a huge influx of new people into a market as small as we have,"&amp;nbsp;he said.&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;Bradley said it's not surprising the RNA rate would be much higher for less expensive horses than&amp;nbsp;those at the top. Consignors with better quality horses are more inclined to withdraw their offerings rather than send them through the ring and buy them back when there is sufficient buyer interest.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:black;mso-themecolor:text1"&gt;"When you have a high-priced yearling that you go to a 2-year-old sale with and it’s not getting vetted, it gets scratched,"&amp;nbsp;Bradley said. "The guys who play at that level say 'I'll take a shot and race it'&amp;nbsp;so those horses are scratched more frequently than the cheaper horses. With cheaper horses you have the little guys—they are more reticent to race than to sell. So they have to run it through the ring even if I have one vet or zero vets on it."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%202YO%20Analysis.jpg" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%202YO%20Analysis.jpg" align="" hspace="" width="500" border="" height="" vspace=""&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648414" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Fasig-Tipton" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Fasig-Tipton/default.aspx" /><category term="Ocala Breeders Sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Ocala+Breeders+Sales/default.aspx" /><category term="juvenile sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/juvenile+sales/default.aspx" /><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="2017 2-year-olds in training sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2017+2-year-olds+in+training+sales/default.aspx" /><category term="Texas Thoroughbred Association" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Texas+Thoroughbred+Association/default.aspx" /><category term="Ron Mitchell" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Ron+Mitchell/default.aspx" /><category term="Barretts" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Barretts/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Reassessing Value with RNA Prices</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/04/04/Reassessing-Value-with-RNA-Prices.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/04/04/Reassessing-Value-with-RNA-Prices.aspx</id><published>2017-04-04T13:34:00Z</published><updated>2017-04-04T13:34:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Eric Mitchell&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The average price of a sire's progeny sold at auction is one our most trusted metrics of commercial value because money actually changed hands. An average sold price follows the adage that an item is worth&amp;nbsp;what someone&amp;nbsp;is willing to pay for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Prices that have not met a reserve&amp;nbsp;also have a place in assessing value. True, no money was exchanged but in an open market the fall-of-the-hammer price does provide a meaningful&amp;nbsp;indicator of a horse's value.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For this reason, &lt;i&gt;BloodHorse MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; compiled the sire averages for the year's first three 2-year-olds in training sales&amp;nbsp;using both sold and unsold with RNA prices. The auctions included are the Fasig-Tipton Gulfstream sale, the Ocala Breeders' Sale&amp;nbsp;Co.'s March sale, and the Barretts March sale. All sires ranked were represented by three or more offered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The leading sire by average price for sold and RNA prices combined is Darley's &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-6801271"&gt;Bernardini&lt;/span&gt;, who actually didn't have any buy-backs. The 14-year-old son of A.P. Indy had five juveniles sell for an average price of $543,600. M.V. Magnier bought his top seller for $1,450,000 at the Gulfstream sale out of the Hartley/De Renzo consignment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Claiborne Farm's late sire &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-4003359"&gt;Arch&lt;/span&gt; ranks second with a sold/RNA average of $530,000 for three offered. Arch only had two of three horses sell so he doesn't show up among the leading sires by average sold but they were certainly well received. Lawrence Best under the name OXO Equine paid $1,050,000 at the OBS March sale for a colt consigned by Tom McCrocklin. The second colt Klaravich Stable bought for $350,000 at the same sale out of Randy Bradshaw's consignment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gainesway's &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-6106474"&gt;Tapit&lt;/span&gt; is the third-leading sire by the sold/RNA average with $526,429 for seven offered. The 16-year-old son of Pulpit and three-time leading sire edged out Bernardini to be the leading sire by average price for horses sold with $587,000 for five sold. Best also bought Tapit's highest-priced juvenile at the OBS March sale, paying $1.1 million for a filly out of grade 2-placed Arienza (&lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-4297000"&gt;Giant's Causeway&lt;/span&gt;) and sold by McCrocklin.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rounding out the top five by sold/RNA average are Darley's &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-4823628"&gt;Medaglia d'Oro&lt;/span&gt; with a $466,429 average for seven offered, and WinStar Farm's &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-4336121"&gt;More Than Ready&lt;/span&gt; with a $428,857 average for seven offered. In the sold column, Medaglia d'Oro ranks third with a $500,833 average for six sold followed by More Than Ready with a $496,250 average for four sold.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A More Than Ready colt out of grade 3-placed Cowgirl Mally (Gone West) has&amp;nbsp;the distinction of being the highest-priced RNA of the juvenile season so far&amp;nbsp;after being bought back at the OBS March sale for $950,000. The colt was consigned by Cary Frommer, who had sold a More Than Ready—Tensas Punch colt at the Gulfstream sale to OXO Equine for $1.1 million. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%20Table.jpg" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%20Table.jpg" align="" hspace="" width="500" border="" height="" vspace=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648416" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Tapit" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Tapit/default.aspx" /><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="2017 2-year-olds in training sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2017+2-year-olds+in+training+sales/default.aspx" /><category term="2017 juvenile sires" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2017+juvenile+sires/default.aspx" /><category term="Thoroughbred sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Thoroughbred+sales/default.aspx" /><category term="Bernardini" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Bernardini/default.aspx" /><category term="Fasig-Tipton Gulfstream" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Fasig-Tipton+Gulfstream/default.aspx" /><category term="Medaglia d'Oro" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Medaglia+d_2700_Oro/default.aspx" /><category term="Ocala Breeders Sales March" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Ocala+Breeders+Sales+March/default.aspx" /><category term="Arch" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Arch/default.aspx" /><category term="More Than Ready" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/More+Than+Ready/default.aspx" /><category term="Barretts March" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Barretts+March/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Leading Sire Title Not Locked Up Yet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/03/28/Leading-Sire-Title-Not-Locked-Up-Yet.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/03/28/Leading-Sire-Title-Not-Locked-Up-Yet.aspx</id><published>2017-03-28T13:41:00Z</published><updated>2017-03-28T13:41:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Eric Mitchell&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The late Unbridled's Song appears to have already clinched the 2017 North American leading sire title with &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9532243"&gt;Arrogate&lt;/span&gt;'s rich back-to-back victories in the $12 million Pegasus World Cup (G1) and $10 million Dubai World Cup Sponsored by Emirates Airline (G1).&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Juddmonte Farms' 4-year-old juggernaut has grabbed $13 million in purses in two starts this year, raising his career earnings to $17,084,600. Now&amp;nbsp;the richest North America-based racehorse in history, he is&amp;nbsp;third among the highest earners worldwide behind Orfevre ($19,005,275) and Gentildonna ($18,468,392).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But should we dismiss any competition for the leading sire title from Gainesway's &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-6106474"&gt;Tapit&lt;/span&gt;, who topped the rankings for the last three years and set a North American earnings record each time? Not quite yet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unquestionably, Tapit has a steep climb ahead if he's to be a serious challenge to Unbridled's Song. The 16-year-old son of Pulpit ranks fifth on the general leading sire list with $2,533,072 in earnings through March 25. He is the leading sire by both number of black-type stakes winners (8) and graded stakes winners (4).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tapit's earnings to date are tracking behind what his progeny had accumulated through March 25 in 2014, 2015, and 2016. At this point in 2014, Tapit's runners had earned $2,898,336. (Note that these earnings include&amp;nbsp;direct conversions from native currency to U.S. dollars and does not have Hong Kong, Japan, and Singapore earnings on par with U.S. average purses as does&amp;nbsp;the &lt;i&gt;BloodHorse&lt;/i&gt; sire lists.) In 2015, Tapit runners had banked $3,566,935 in earnings, and in 2016, the earnings totaled $3,758,122.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Tapit's year mirrors how his progeny performed in 2014, then he's on track to finish the year with about $15.8 million in progeny earnings. Close but still significantly&amp;nbsp;north of the $13,800,913 Unbridled's Song's progeny have earned through March 25. If Tapit's 2017 season unfolds like it did in 2015 and 2016, when he had earned a greater portion of his total earnings by March 25, then his end of the year total could be between $13.5 million and $14.1 million, which will not&amp;nbsp;get the job done.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is worth noting that Tapit did not have either a Dubai World Cup winner or a Breeders' Cup Classic (G1) winner in any of his three record-setting years. His progeny could rally in the second half the year to give Unbridled's Song some competition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Arrogate, however, keeps improving off his already peerless performances, then Unbridled's Song not only gets the leading sire title but could be&amp;nbsp;in position to challenge Tapit's most recent earnings record of $19,245,198. Plenty of intrigue among the leading sires still lies ahead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%20Tapit%20Earnings%20Table.jpg" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%20Tapit%20Earnings%20Table.jpg" align="" hspace="" width="600" border="" height="" vspace=""&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648417" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Unbridled's Song" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Unbridled_2700_s+Song/default.aspx" /><category term="Tapit" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Tapit/default.aspx" /><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="Arrogate" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Arrogate/default.aspx" /><category term="2017 leading sires" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2017+leading+sires/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Top 2-year-old Sires by Average Work Times and Prices</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/03/21/Top-2_2D00_year_2D00_old-Sires-by-Average-Work-Times-and-Prices.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/03/21/Top-2_2D00_year_2D00_old-Sires-by-Average-Work-Times-and-Prices.aspx</id><published>2017-03-21T13:55:00Z</published><updated>2017-03-21T13:55:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Eric Mitchell&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the first&amp;nbsp;of 2-year-olds in training sales behind us, &lt;i&gt;BloodHorse MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; compiled a list of the leading sires by average under tack show&amp;nbsp;times and compared the average prices among those sires.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The list, which included only sires with three or more sold, narrowed the field of 127 sires presented at either the Fasig-Tipton Gulfstream sale or the Ocala Breeders' Sales March auction down to 55. The average one-furlong under tack times by the progeny of the 55 sires ranged from :10 (all fractions in this article have been converted from fifths to tenths of a second) to :10.7. Among the 55 sires, 32 had at least one runner also work a quarter-mile.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The two sires sharing the lowest average time of :10 were Adena Springs Kentucky's &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-5342927"&gt;Ghostzapper&lt;/span&gt; and Lane's End Farm's third-crop sire &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-7998833"&gt;Twirling Candy&lt;/span&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ghostzapper was&amp;nbsp;represented by three juveniles sold so far this year; two worked an eighth-mile at the OBS March under tack show—one in :10.2 and one in :9.8—and another&amp;nbsp;worked a quarter-mile in :21.4. His top seller was his fleetest, a filly out of the winning Arch daughter Gold Vault. The filly bred by Cherry Valley Farm is also a full sister to grade 1&amp;nbsp;winner &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-8565609"&gt;Contested&lt;/span&gt; and a half sister to black-type stakes winners &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9102146"&gt;Mosler&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-6456513"&gt;War Front&lt;/span&gt;). The 17-year-old son of Awesome Again has a 2-year-old average of $453,333 so far this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twirling Candy also had two work an eighth-mile—both in :10 at the OBS March sale—and one, a quarter-mile in :21.4. The son of &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-5902892"&gt;Candy Ride&lt;/span&gt;'s top seller so far is a filly out of &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-8566726"&gt;Make Music&lt;/span&gt; (Unbridled's Song), that agent Steve Young bought for $210,000 out of the de Meric Sales consignment. The filly was bred in Kentucky by Will Farish with the E.J. Hudson Jr. irrevocable trust.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Five sires were co-ranked in third on the list with an average time of :10.1—&lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-5311090"&gt;Congrats&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-7444318"&gt;Majestic Warrior&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-8334844"&gt;Point of Entry&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-8696740"&gt;Prospective&lt;/span&gt;, and &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-5644412"&gt;Wildcat Heir&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Among these WinStar Farm's Congrats had the highest overall average price of $653,333 for three sold. His average had the biggest boost from a the $1.7 million OBS March sale topper, a daughter out of Azalea Belle who agent Kerri Radcliffe bought out of the McKathan Brothers' consignment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Among the sires with average eighth-mile times of :10.25 and below, six are freshman sires of 2017. Adena Springs' Point of Entry and Ocala Stud's Prospective had the lowest average times. Point of Entry's&amp;nbsp;average price to date is $358,333, while Prospective has a $71,667 average.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The freshman sire with the highest average price is Claiborne's &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-8834015"&gt;Orb&lt;/span&gt;, who had six sell for a $480,000 average. Hill 'n' Dale Farms' &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-8869327"&gt;Violence&lt;/span&gt; has been represented by the most sold to date, with nine averaging $184,111. The son of Medaglia d'Oro had eight work an eighth-mile for an average of :10.2.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%20Sires%20Avg%20Times%20Table.jpg" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%20Sires%20Avg%20Times%20Table.jpg" align="" hspace="" width="650" border="" height="" vspace=""&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648418" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="2017 2-year-olds in training sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2017+2-year-olds+in+training+sales/default.aspx" /><category term="works" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/works/default.aspx" /><category term="workout times" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/workout+times/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Leading Trainers of Maidens and Sophomores</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/03/06/Leading-Trainers-of-Maidens-and-Sophomores.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/03/06/Leading-Trainers-of-Maidens-and-Sophomores.aspx</id><published>2017-03-06T21:37:00Z</published><updated>2017-03-06T21:37:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Two of the highest profile classes of horses a trainer will have in his barn are maidens and 3-year-olds. A relatively high percentage of maiden special weight wins indicates a trainer who has the ability and team to manage inexperienced horses and get their careers off to a good start, while the ability to successfully manage 3-year-olds is high on most owners' lists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Each year &lt;i&gt;BloodHorse MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; publishes detailed statistics on the top 100 North American trainers by earnings (ranging from $23,134,394 for Chad Brown to $1,853,011 for John Toscano Jr.). This section will appear in the March 18 edition of &lt;i&gt;BloodHorse&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Among these top trainers, we carved out the leaders by percentage of MSW wins and 3-year-old wins from starts in the respective categories to see which trainers have found success in both categories. With 3-year-olds, we identified 15 trainers with 25% or more wins in 2016. Then we sorted the list to identify 12 trainers with 25% or more MSW wins. Four trainers appeared on both lists: Brad Cox, Larry Jones, Jeff Radosevich, and Wesley Ward.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Midwest-based Radosevich, had the highest win percentages in both categories among the four trainers highlighted here,&amp;nbsp;with 39% MSW wins from 41 starts and 30% 3-year-old wins from 178 starts.&amp;nbsp;Radosevich began training in the fall of 1993 after a 14-year career as a jockey. The 55-year-old Richfield, Ohio, resident has 2,209 wins and career earnings of nearly $24 million. His top 3-year-old of 2016 was Loooch Racing Stables' &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9581046"&gt;Mo Dont No&lt;/span&gt;, who won the Steel Valley Sprint Stakes and the Best of Ohio Endurance Stakes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brad Cox leads the group of four by total 2016 earnings with $6,288,972. Cox, who began training in 2004, has 28% 3-year-old wins from 202 starts and 27% MSW wins from 101 starts. His top 3-year-olds included multiple stakes winners &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9509714"&gt;Cash Back&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9511197"&gt;Extra Credit&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jones leads the quartet by average earnings per runner with $44,832 out of 66 runners. He had 27% MSW wins from 70 starts and 25% wins with 3-year-olds out of 132 starts. In 2016 his top 3-year-olds were stakes winners &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9501812"&gt;He'll Pay&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9514750"&gt;No Distortion&lt;/span&gt;, and &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9529484"&gt;Southern Girl&lt;/span&gt;. Jones, who began training in 1982, has 1,050 career wins and nearly $47.2 million in total earnings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ward has enjoyed far more success with maiden runners than any of other three trainers. Out of his almost $50 million in career earnings to date, he's made more than $15.3 million with maidens. Ward had 26% wins out of 117 MSW starts last year and 25% wins out of 167 starts with 3-year-olds. His best sophomore of 2016 was &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9472615"&gt;Acapulco&lt;/span&gt;, who was a group 2 winner at 2 and a listed stakes winner at 3. Otherwise his top runners in 2016 were juvenile stakes winners &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9737292"&gt;Silvertoni&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9730341"&gt;Con Te Partiro&lt;/span&gt;, and &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9679147"&gt;Red Lodge&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MW%20Trainers%20Charts%20MSW.jpg" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MW%20Trainers%20Charts%20MSW.jpg" width="525" vspace="" border="" align="" hspace="" height=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MW%20Trainers%20Charts%203YOs.jpg" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MW%20Trainers%20Charts%203YOs.jpg" width="525" vspace="" border="" align="" hspace="" height=""&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648356" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="Wesley Ward" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Wesley+Ward/default.aspx" /><category term="top North American trainers" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/top+North+American+trainers/default.aspx" /><category term="Brad Cox" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Brad+Cox/default.aspx" /><category term="Larry Jones" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Larry+Jones/default.aspx" /><category term="Jeff Radosevich" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Jeff+Radosevich/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Northern Afleet Best in Durability Study</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/02/13/Northern-Afleet-Best-in-Durability-Study.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/02/13/Northern-Afleet-Best-in-Durability-Study.aspx</id><published>2017-02-13T16:34:00Z</published><updated>2017-02-13T16:34:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Sources of stamina among North American stallions seems to be getting leaner as judged by the recent release of the Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation's annual report of sire durability and soundness (see near pg. 66 in the Feb. 11 issue of &lt;i&gt;BloodHorse&lt;/i&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Among the leading 30 stallions by starts per starter, 13 sires have died, two are pensioned, and three have been relocated to either Argentina or Australia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The stallions included in the durability study are the top 200 sires by progeny earnings for the 2016 calendar year in order to assure relevance to the commercial breeding and sales market. The study's key statistics of starts per starter and percentage of starters from foals of racing age, however, are all lifetime statistics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Combing through the study, one stallion consistently ranked among top sires by various statistics published.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Taylor Made Stallions' veteran &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-1394968"&gt;Northern Afleet&lt;/span&gt; ranked among the top 10 by starts per starter, the top 20 by percentage of starters from foals of racing age, the top 10 by number of 2016 graded stakes winners 4 years old and up, and was in the top 12 by number of 2016 black-type stakes winners 4 years old and older. He stands for $6,500 this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 24-year-old son of Afleet—Nuryette, by Nureyev, has 16 crops of racing age. He is the 16th-leading sire in the Grayson-Jockey Club study by percentage of starters from foals of racing age with 81.2%. If only active North American sires are considered, he is the seventh-leading sire behind &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-4336121"&gt;More Than Ready&lt;/span&gt; (1,253 foals, 86.8% starters), &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-1356376"&gt;Petionville&lt;/span&gt; (736, 86.1%), &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-6130434"&gt;Weigelia&lt;/span&gt; (75, 85.3%), &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-1354584"&gt;Langfuhr&lt;/span&gt; (1,328, 85.1%), &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-7198670"&gt;Street Sense&lt;/span&gt; (466, 84.1%), and &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-6225056"&gt;Mass Media&lt;/span&gt; (199, 81.4%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By lifetime starts per starter, Northern Afleet is the third-leading active sire with 19.87 out of 1,328 foals of racing age. The top active sire in this category is Murmur Farm's &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-1356376"&gt;Petionville&lt;/span&gt;, who has 21.26 starts per starter out of 736 foals. The 25-year-old son of Seeking the Gold stands for $5,000. Ranked second by starts per starter at 20.48 is Lane's End's Langfuhr, a 25-year-old son of Danzig, who stands this year for $5,000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Among all sires—active, pensioned, and dead—the leaders by starts per starter are &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-1322446"&gt;Mutakddim&lt;/span&gt;, a son of Seeking the Gold, who has 23.91 starts/starter&amp;nbsp;out of 797 foals; and, former Maryland stalwart &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-1290030"&gt;Not For Love&lt;/span&gt;, a son of Mr. Prospector, who has 21.90 starts/starter out of 974 foals. Mutakddim died in 2014, while Not For Love died in 2016.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Besides durability, Northern Afleet's runners have shown class as well. He is co-ranked in 12th by 2016 black-type stakes winners with five that were 4 years old and up and co-ranked in eighth place with three graded/group winners that were 4 or older. His graded/group winners last year include &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9283961"&gt;World Approval&lt;/span&gt;, winner of the United National Stakes (G1), &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-8898541"&gt;Kaigun&lt;/span&gt;, winner of the Pan American Stakes (G2), and &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9456519"&gt;Baccelo&lt;/span&gt;, who won the Philip H. Iselin Stakes (G3). &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%20Durability%20Chart.jpg" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%20Durability%20Chart.jpg" align="" hspace="" height="" width="500" vspace="" border=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648332" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="Northern Afleet" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Northern+Afleet/default.aspx" /><category term="Thoroughbred racehorses" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Thoroughbred+racehorses/default.aspx" /><category term="durability study" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/durability+study/default.aspx" /><category term="Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Grayson-Jockey+Club+Research+Foundation/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Recent Juvenile Sale Cycle Points to Up Year for 2017</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/02/06/Recent-Juvenile-Sale-Cycle-Points-to-Up-Year-for-2017.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/02/06/Recent-Juvenile-Sale-Cycle-Points-to-Up-Year-for-2017.aspx</id><published>2017-02-06T16:12:00Z</published><updated>2017-02-06T16:12:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Successful pinhookers are like long-term stock investors. They set their spending limits, buy as much quality as they can afford, and stick to the basic&amp;nbsp;principles that identify performance potential in young Thoroughbreds.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also like stock investors, they are savvy to market cycles and recognize when to stretch on their yearling purchases and when to be conservative.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The overall return on investments for yearling to juvenile pinhooks since 2012 shows a steady rise and fall that seems to mirror a collectively inescapable part of human nature. When the market is up, optimism drives more spending. Collectively pinhookers with fatter wallets invested more in their yearlings—either buying more expensive yearlings and/or buying more horses—only to later face a juvenile market that didn't share their optimism, according to recent history.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2012, the 2-year-old market enjoyed its second consecutive rise in ROI, albeit a modest 4% increase (25% ROI compared with 21% in 2011), as the Thoroughbred market recovered&amp;nbsp;from the aftermath of the Great Recession. Buoyed by two consecutive years of growth, pinhookers stretched more on their yearling purchases, spending 14.2% more on average. They were rewarded in 2013 by a robust juvenile market in which the average price rose 15.4%, the percentage of profitable yearlings rose to 49% from 41%, and pinhooks generated a 33% ROI as a whole.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The pinhook market reacted by taking another big swing with its yearling purchases. The $44,421 average pinhook yearling price heading into the 2014 market was 14.6% higher than the previous year. One metric did indicate the 2014 juvenile market would not be as solid as what 2013 delivered:&amp;nbsp;a slowing in the rate growth for the average 2-year-old price. The juvenile average price between 2011 and 2012 rose 23.6%. Between 2012 and 2013, the increase was 15.4%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More yearlings bought at a higher average price were offered in 2014 and the juvenile market reacted by generating a 17% ROI, nearly half of what it was in 2013. The percentage of profitable horses dropped to 40% from 49% and the overall average 2-year-old price dipped 3.2%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2015, pinhookers bought fewer horses but spent 8.5% more on average, reacting to the greater attention being paid on the top of the market. The ROI rose to 28%. For 2016, pinookers took a similar strategy, buying fewer yearlings but spending another 2.6% more on average. The supply and demand balance tipped back, however, the ROI fell to 21% and profitable purchases were down to 41% from 46%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If pinhookers followed their instincts after the 2-year-old sales and were more conservative with their yearling purchases, then the juvenile market of 2017 should be another up year with a return to around 45% profitability and an ROI of around 30%. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%20Table.jpg" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MarketWatch%20Table.jpg" align="" hspace="" height="" width="500" vspace="" border=""&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648331" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="pinhooks" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/pinhooks/default.aspx" /><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="pinhooking" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/pinhooking/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Pegasus Puts Unbridled's Song on Top</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/01/30/Pegasus-Puts-Unbridled_2700_s-Song-on-Top.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/01/30/Pegasus-Puts-Unbridled_2700_s-Song-on-Top.aspx</id><published>2017-01-30T16:04:00Z</published><updated>2017-01-30T16:04:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nowhere is the impact of a $12 million race felt more keenly than on the general leading sire list for North America, where Unbridled's Song has made a meteoric rise to the top. In 1:47.61, the late son of Unbridled's progeny earnings went from $276,412 to $7,276,412.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now with Pegasus World Cup Invitational Stakes (G1) winner &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9532243"&gt;Arrogate&lt;/span&gt; primed for the rest of his 4-year-old campaign&amp;nbsp;with the year-end target of&amp;nbsp;another run in the Breeders' Cup Classic (G1), it is quite possible that Unbridled's Song could remain the leading sire largely off the outcome of a few races.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To further put in perspective&amp;nbsp;how one race has influenced Unbridled's Song's ranking historically, his progeny earnings through Jan. 28—barely one month into the year—is more than his progeny have earned in all but&amp;nbsp;three years since 2001. Unbridled's Song had his best year&amp;nbsp;in 2016 with his progeny raking in $10,421,244 in purses. Arrogate was his chief earner with $4,084,600 for owner Juddmonte Farm.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unbridled's Song previously had his second-best and third-best years by earnings in 2013 and 2008, respectively. In 2013 his progeny collected $9,509,946 led by Eclipse champion 3-year-old &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-8866097"&gt;Will Take Charge&lt;/span&gt;, who won four graded stakes on his way to earning nearly $3 million. Unbridled's Song would finish 2013 ranked as North America's sixth-leading sire, the highest end-of-the-year ranking he's achieved on the general leading sire list. In 2008 Unbridled's Song was the 10th-leading sire with $7,287,632 in progeny earnings with his son &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-7732652"&gt;Midshipman&lt;/span&gt; taking the title of chief earner with $1.38 million in prize money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The sires of the second-, third-, and fourth-place finishers in the Pegasus World Cup also rose accordingly on the general leading sire's list.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Adena Springs' &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-5342927"&gt;Ghostzapper&lt;/span&gt;, the sire of second-place finisher and Queen's Plate winner &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9338334"&gt;Shaman Ghost&lt;/span&gt;, is now ranked as the second-leading sire with $1,999,650. Ghostzapper (by &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-1439425"&gt;Awesome Again&lt;/span&gt;) finished as the 20th-leading sire last year with $7,803,733 in earnings.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The late Harlan's Holiday, the sire of Pegasus World Cup third-place finisher &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9507518"&gt;Neolithic&lt;/span&gt;, is now the third-leading sire with $1,410,238 in earnings. Neolithic, whose best performance prior to the Pegasus World Cup was a second in the grade 3 Discovery Stakes, earned a cool $1 million for owner Starlight Racing for finishing 3 1/2 lengths behind Shaman Ghost, who was 4 3/4 lengths behind Arrogate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One feature of the inaugural Pegasus World Cup was that all finishers from fourth through 12th received $250,000. This helped &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-9317888"&gt;Keen Ice&lt;/span&gt; raise his sire Curlin's progeny earnings to $720,359 to date, good enough to put him in the fourth spot on the general leading sire list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Arrogate's big payday had an equally powerful influence on the ranking of his broodmare sire, &lt;span class="bloodhorse-horse" id="horse-1396750"&gt;Distorted Humor&lt;/span&gt;. WinStar Farm's hallmark stallion is the leading North American broodmare sire with $7,669,535. The race bumped up Distorted Humor's lifetime average earnings index as a broodmare sire, too, from 1.63 before the Pegasus World Cup to 1.71.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648330" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Unbridled's Song" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Unbridled_2700_s+Song/default.aspx" /><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="Arrogate" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Arrogate/default.aspx" /><category term="Harlan's Holiday" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Harlan_2700_s+Holiday/default.aspx" /><category term="Distorted Humor" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Distorted+Humor/default.aspx" /><category term="Pegasus World Cup Invitational Stakes" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Pegasus+World+Cup+Invitational+Stakes/default.aspx" /><category term="Neolithic" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Neolithic/default.aspx" /><category term="Ghostzapper" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Ghostzapper/default.aspx" /><category term="Shaman Ghost" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Shaman+Ghost/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Predicting Leading Freshman Sires of 2017</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/01/23/Predicting-Leading-Freshman-Sires-of-2017.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/01/23/Predicting-Leading-Freshman-Sires-of-2017.aspx</id><published>2017-01-23T15:29:00Z</published><updated>2017-01-23T15:29:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Time to dust off the crystal ball and attempt to decipher which freshman sires of 2017 are likely to be at or near the top of the first-crop sire list at year's end.&amp;nbsp;The only certainty in such an exercise is that someone will surprise us.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the past few years, &lt;i&gt;BloodHorse MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; has published statistical profiles of the first-crop sires represented within the top 10% of yearlings sold at auction. These profiles are included in the Jan. 21 edition of BloodHorse on pages 44-46.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Early market success is certainly no guarantee of racing success, but the market narrows the field. We then look at other statistics that may indicate precociousness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In broad terms, the top three first-crop sires of 2015 and 2016 shared the following: both had at least 90 live first-crop foals (more runners means more earnings); their first book of mares had a collective&amp;nbsp;Comparable Index (CI) of 1.5 or higher and a Class Performance Index (CPI) of at least 2.5; and, at least 28% of first-crop dams were winners&amp;nbsp;at 2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is one recent exception to the CI/CPI rule and that's Darby Dan's Dialed In—the leading freshman sire of 2016—who had a first book CI of 1.23 and CPI of 2.06. The son of Mineshaft did have other advantages, including the fourth-largest crop among freshman sires in the top 10% by yearling price and was among the top six sires of his class by the percentage of first-crop dams that produced 2-year-old winners (25%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among 2016's freshman sires only one&amp;nbsp;scored consistently among the top by number of live foals, CI, CPI, percentage of dams with 2-year-old winners, percentage of dams that were winners at 2, and&amp;nbsp;yearling average price. That was Lane's End's Union Rags, who finished as the second-ranked leading freshman sire. For 2015, the only sire who ranked consistently among these same categories was Ashford Stud's Uncle Mo, who was the leading freshman sire and this year's leading second-crop sire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For 2017, again, one sire ranks among the top of these six statistical categories—Claiborne Farm's Orb. The son of Malibu Moon and winner of the 2013 Kentucky Derby Presented by Yum! Brands (G1) had 101 live foals in 2015, a 2.06 CI, 4.75 CPI, 24% dams to produce 2-year-old winners, 56% dams that won at 2, and a yearling average exceeding $147,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on their statistical profiles, these other sires bear watching: Taylor Made Stallion's Graydar (103 foals/1.83 CI/3.05 CPI), Darley's Animal Kingdom (111/2.53 CI/4.59 CPI), Hill 'n' Dale Farm's Violence (128/1.53 CI/2.73 CPI, WinStar Farm's Take Charge Indy (107/1.69 CI/2.69 CPI), Ashford Stud's Shanghai Bobby (117/ 1.56 CI/2.44 CPI), and Spendthrift Farm's Jimmy Creed (96/1.68 CI/2.79 CPI).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shanghai Bobby's first dams fall&amp;nbsp;outside the overall CPI minimum and percentage of dams to produce 2-year-old winners seen among previous leading first-crop sires,&amp;nbsp;but he has a solid percentage of dams that won at 2 and may have an edge as 2012 champion 2-year-old colt. The son of Harlan's Holiday will have plenty of opportunity with 117 first-crop foals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MKT%20Watch%20Table.jpg" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/MKT%20Watch%20Table.jpg" align="" hspace="" height="" width="400" vspace="" border=""&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648329" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Animal Kingdom" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Animal+Kingdom/default.aspx" /><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="Orb" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Orb/default.aspx" /><category term="Violence" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Violence/default.aspx" /><category term="Jimmy Creed" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Jimmy+Creed/default.aspx" /><category term="Graydar" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Graydar/default.aspx" /><category term="Take Charge Indy" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Take+Charge+Indy/default.aspx" /><category term="2017 freshman sires" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2017+freshman+sires/default.aspx" /><category term="Shanghai Bobby" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Shanghai+Bobby/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Keeneland January's Leading Covering Sires</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/01/18/Keeneland-January_2700_s-Leading-Covering-Sires.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/01/18/Keeneland-January_2700_s-Leading-Covering-Sires.aspx</id><published>2017-01-18T13:57:00Z</published><updated>2017-01-18T13:57:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Father and son Pioneerof the Nile and American Pharoah topped the leading covering sire ranks by gross and average at the five-day Keeneland January horses of all ages sale that ended Jan. 13.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mares bred to American Pharoah, the 2015 Triple Crown winner who stands at Ashford Stud, attracted the highest gross of $955,000 and the highest average of $477,500 for only two sold out of seven offered. As an indication of how thin the offerings were by top covering sires at the January sale, however, five of the top 10 sires by gross were represented by only two purchases.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;WinStar Farm's Pioneerof the Nile ranked second by gross and average, with total purchases equaling $610,000 and averaging $305,000 for two sold out of three offered.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;American Pharoah's top seller was the unraced Mineshaft daughter Joyfully, who is out of the graded stakes producer Rejoicing (Forestry), the dam of grade 3 winners Divine Oath and Auntie Joy. The 4-year-old mare was sold for $575,000 to Oussama Aboughazale's International Equities Holding out of the Paramount Sales consignment. Joyfully delivered an Uncle Mo colt in 2016 and will be bred back to War Front, Aboughazale told BloodHorse earlier in the week.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An even closer to connection to leading second-crop sire Uncle Mo existed with Pioneerof the Nile's highest-priced mare as a covering sire, the winning Silver Deputy daughter Grosse Pointe Anne. The 10-year-old mare is a half sister to Uncle Mo (Indian Charlie) and the dam of stakes-placed winner Indian Annie (Indian Charlie). Gross Pointe Anne has an unnamed 2-year-old colt by Speightstown and had a filly by Pioneerof the Nile in 2016.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The third-ranked covering sire by average price is Spendthrift Farm's Into Mischief, who was represented by two mares averaging $157,000. His top seller was On the Backstreets, a multiple stakes-winning daughter of Street Boss, who Mulholland Springs as agent sold for $235,000 to Kempton, as agent for Not This Time/AFS. On the Backstreets' dam is Mutakaway, a winning daughter of Mutakddim and the producer of three winners out of three foals to start. On the Backstreets is her only stakes winner to date. The family has also produced grade 3 winner Jet Stream and grade 1-placed winner Western Justice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Three other sires who will be represented by their first crop this year were among the leading covering sires by average price: Honor Code, ranked fourth at $145,000; Liam's Map, ranked sixth with $124,000; and Tonalist, ranked 10th with a $71,667 average. All three sires stand at Lane's End Farm.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="auction-list"&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;2017 Keeneland January Horses of All Ages Sale&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Top Covering Sires by Average&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p class="micro"&gt;(min. 2 sold)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table class="sale-table sale-table-top-sires"&gt;
	&lt;thead&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;th&gt;Sire&lt;/th&gt;
			&lt;th align="center"&gt;Offered&lt;/th&gt;
			&lt;th align="center"&gt;Sold &lt;/th&gt;
			&lt;th align="right"&gt;Average&lt;/th&gt;
			&lt;th align="right"&gt;Median&lt;/th&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
	&lt;/thead&gt;
	&lt;tbody&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;American Pharoah &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;7&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;$477,500&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;&amp;nbsp;$477,500&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Pioneerof the Nile&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;$305,000&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;&amp;nbsp;$305,000&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Into Mischief&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;$157,500&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;&amp;nbsp;$157,500&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Honor Code&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;$145,000&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;&amp;nbsp;$145,000&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;City Zip&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;$130,000&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;&amp;nbsp;$130,000&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Liam&amp;#39;s Map&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;5&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;$124,000&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;&amp;nbsp;$140,000&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Street Sense&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;$118,500&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;&amp;nbsp;$118,500&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Hard Spun&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;4&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;4&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;$89,625&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;&amp;nbsp;$73,500&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Union Rags&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;4&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;$73,500&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;&amp;nbsp;$73,500&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;
			&lt;td&gt;Tonalist&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;8&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="center"&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;$71,667&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td align="right"&gt;&amp;nbsp;$45,000&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
	&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648285" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Keeneland January" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Keeneland+January/default.aspx" /><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Analysis" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Analysis/default.aspx" /><category term="covering sires" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/covering+sires/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>MW Interview: Sean Feld Talks About Climax Stallions</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/01/18/MW-Interview_3A00_-Sean-Feld-Talks-About-Climax-Stallions.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2017/01/18/MW-Interview_3A00_-Sean-Feld-Talks-About-Climax-Stallions.aspx</id><published>2017-01-18T13:43:00Z</published><updated>2017-01-18T13:43:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Last fall the family team of bloodstock agent Bob Feld, his son Sean Feld, and trainer Mark Feld, put a name to a concept they had been testing since Bullet Train—half brother to European champion Frankel—retired to stud in 2013. Climax Stallions is the Felds' new stallion syndication venture that is modeled more similarly to racehorse syndications.&lt;/i&gt; BloodHorse MarketWatch &lt;i&gt;editor Eric Mitchell talked with Sean Feld about the new company, which is now recruiting investors for its most recent acquisition, grade 1 winner Haynesfield.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;BloodHorse MarketWatch:&lt;/b&gt; Where did the idea for Climax Stallions originate?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sean Feld:&lt;/b&gt; Bullet Train was our guinea pig. We were looking for a way to attract non-horse people, so we got a lot of professional business types who watched horse racing and gambled on the weekends but had never owned a horse. That went pretty well so my uncle Mark saw this opportunity to get people involved in the game on the stallion side instead of through pinhooking or buying a small piece of a racehorse.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;BH:&lt;/b&gt; How does your stallion syndication differ from more traditional stallion syndications?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;SF:&lt;/b&gt; The minimum buy-in is 10%, and you don't get any breeding rights, which fits with our target audience that doesn't own mares. You just own a 10% equity in the stallion. Our goal is to use stallions that can stand on their own merit and don't need a lot of inside support. There is power in numbers, but we feel if you can find the right stallion for the right price, then we'll get enough mares regardless of who owns him. Investors are responsible for 10% of the expenses and entitled to 10% of the profits.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are selling the dream that Haynesfield or Curlin to Mischief could be a good cash generator if they hit. Your initial costs are less and your risk is less than with a racehorse in training.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;BH:&lt;/b&gt; Action is a key attraction in owning a racehorse. Can a stallion syndicate investor get the same rush?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;SF:&lt;/b&gt; Certainly owning a racehorse is the most fun, but we feel there is still a lot of action with the stallions. My uncle, who (races as) Lucas Downs, is an action junkie. He likes the stallion thing because with Bullet Train, for example, he had 45 2-year-olds last year, so he feels he owns a piece of every one of his progeny.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;BH:&lt;/b&gt; Why did you decide to acquire Haynesfield last fall?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;SF:&lt;/b&gt; Bullet Train and Curlin to Mischief are sold out. The luxury with Haynesfield is the investor doesn't have to wait like he does with the new guys. Haynesfield has had four crops and averaged over 90 mares a year his first four years at stud. Since we bought Haynesfield, we've been tracking the entries and he's got one or two every day. It is a lot of action for someone who is a novice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And the timing was good. He had an impressive maiden winner at Fair Grounds Jan. 8 in Midway Gold. We're pretty excited about him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=648284" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>emitchell@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/emitchell_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Climax Stallions" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Climax+Stallions/default.aspx" /><category term="BloodHorse MarketWatch Interview" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/BloodHorse+MarketWatch+Interview/default.aspx" /><category term="Mark Feld" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Mark+Feld/default.aspx" /><category term="Sean Feld" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Sean+Feld/default.aspx" /><category term="Bob Feld" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Bob+Feld/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Book Size Signals Fluctuating Popularity for Stallions</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/11/19/book-size-signals-fluctuating-popularity-for-stallions.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/11/19/book-size-signals-fluctuating-popularity-for-stallions.aspx</id><published>2014-11-19T15:00:00Z</published><updated>2014-11-19T15:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A sire's career typically hinges on his first 2-year-olds, no matter what the initial market opinion was of the horse when he first entered stud. Occasionally that first crop vaults a stallion from obscurity (Malibu Moon, for example), but more often the opposite happens when the first crop fails to meet expectations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/smarty-jones-mb-sw-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/smarty-jones-mb-sw-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/smarty-jones-mb-sw-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/smarty-jones-mb-sw-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Smarty Jones entered stud for $100,000 as the champion 3-year-old colt of 2004. He bred 112 mares his first season and led all first-year stallions with a 4.31 CI of mares bred in 2005. He posted similar numbers in his subsequent crops until his runners hit the track in 2008. With only one stakes winner from 28 runners, his book quality and size began to decline. Smarty Jones relocated to Pennsylvania in 2011 and had a 50% increase in the number of mares bred. While he has recently increased his stakes winner percentage, he has averaged only 110 starters per year since 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/corinthian-mb-sw-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/corinthian-mb-sw-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/corinthian-mb-sw-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/corinthian-mb-sw-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While not a champion, Corinthian boasted a very strong pedigree and had recorded wins in the Metropolitan Handicap (gr. I) and inaugural Breeders' Cup Dirt Mile when he entered stud in 2008. He stood for $40,000, the co-third highest entering fee after Kentucky Derby Presented by Yum! Brands (gr.I) winner Street Sense ($75,000) and Derby runner-up Hard Spun ($50,000). Corinthian received strong support from breeders with 643 mares bred in his first four seasons, but after his first crop of 2-year-olds failed to impress with only one stakes winner and no graded stakes wins, his numbers declined sharply by -59% from his fourth to fifth seasons. Like Smarty Jones, Corinthian's numbers improved after he was relocated to Pin Oak Lane Farm in Pennsylvania for the 2014 breeding season. He stood for $4,000 and covered 54 mares, a 391% increase over his 2013 book.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/fusaichi-pegasus-mb-sw-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/fusaichi-pegasus-mb-sw-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/fusaichi-pegasus-mb-sw-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/fusaichi-pegasus-mb-sw-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fusaichi Pegasus entered stud for $150,000 after winning the Kentucky Derby in 2000. Adding to his value as a stallion prospect was the promise of becoming the next great heir to his recently deceased champion sire Mr. Prospector, who had died in 1999. Covering more than 150 mares in each of his first two seasons, Fusaichi Pegasus had a slight lull in his third year at stud. However, his book increased by 69% in 2004 following a strong yearling sales season in which his North American yearlings averaged $329,095. After finishing third on the first-crop sires list with six stakes winners and two graded winners, his 2005 book increased to 213, his largest book to date. But his runners proved to be less consistent as 3-year-olds and as his percentage of stakes winners declined, so did his book size. He stood for $7,500 in 2014 and his yearlings averaged $20,440 from five sold.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ghostzapper-mb-sw-01.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ghostzapper-mb-sw-sm-01.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ghostzapper-mb-sw-sm-01.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ghostzapper-mb-sw-01.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ghostzapper appeared to be following a similar decline after his first 2-year-olds debuted. After setting a North American record with an entering fee of $200,000, Ghostzapper sired only one stakes winner and no graded stakes winners as a freshman sire in 2009. He bred a career-low 79 mares in 2010. However, Ghostzapper's runners showed more promise as they matured, and after a sophomore season with two graded stakes horses, including grade I winner Stately Victor, Ghostzapper's book increased by 51%. During the past two years he has sired 10% stakes winners from runners, and he covered 130 mares in 2014 at a fee of $50,000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=647265" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Stud Fees" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Stud+Fees/default.aspx" /><category term="Comparable Index" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Comparable+Index/default.aspx" /><category term="unproven stallions" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/unproven+stallions/default.aspx" /><category term="quality of mares bred" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/quality+of+mares+bred/default.aspx" /><category term="book size" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/book+size/default.aspx" /><category term="sires" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/sires/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Identifying Profitable Yearlings In-Utero at Keeneland November</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/10/30/identifying-profitable-yearlings-in-utero-at-keeneland-november.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/10/30/identifying-profitable-yearlings-in-utero-at-keeneland-november.aspx</id><published>2014-10-30T13:00:00Z</published><updated>2014-10-30T13:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More than 1,900 broodmares will be offered in-foal at this year's Keeneland November breeding stock sale. Many buyers will keep the resulting foals from these mares, but some foals will enter the auction ring as yearlings in two years' time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mares like Blading Gold Ring, who sold for $165,000 in foal to War Front in 2011, can see a big return from their foals at the yearling auctions: Her resulting colt sold for $2.2 million last year, the co-highest price of the 2013 North American yearling sale season. Others, like grade I winner Spain, sold in foal to Storm Cat in 2003 for $5.3 million, may not be so fortunate, with her subsequent foal selling for $150,000, just 2.8% of her cost.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-stacked-venn.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-stacked-venn.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-stacked-venn.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-stacked-venn.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of all mares offered at Keeneland November from 2000-13, only 23% will sell and have the resulting foal sold as a yearling. Of those yearlings, 52% will bring a higher price than their dam.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To find the yearlings most likely to bring a higher return, we isolated three factors affecting the mare's sales price: covering fee, foal order, and the age of the mare. For the graphs below, only sold mares at Keeneland November 2000-13 and the sold yearlings of those mares were included&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-covering-fee-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-covering-fee-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-covering-fee-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-covering-fee-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not surprisingly, yearlings bred on higher fees returned a greater percentage of their dam's sales price. On average, yearlings out of dams bred on fees of $15,000 or more sold more than matched their dam's original cost. The worst return was realized by those sired by stallions in the $10,000-14,999 range, with yearlings returning 85% of the dam's price.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-foal-order-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-foal-order-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-foal-order-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-foal-order-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-mare-age-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-mare-age-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-mare-age-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-yrlgs-mare-age-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Despite statistically stronger average racing performance from foals earlier in birth order and out of younger mares, yearlings from older mares brought a greater return. The first through sixth foals out of a dam brought an average of 60% of the dam's sales price, whereas later foals returned 100% of her price.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This contradiction can be explained by the fact that a mare's value declines as she ages (she has fewer future breeding opportunities), and that the value of a yearling is likely to increase if its dam is older and more accomplished as a producer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=647208" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="yearlings" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/yearlings/default.aspx" /><category term="Keeneland November" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Keeneland+November/default.aspx" /><category term="in-utero foals" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/in-utero+foals/default.aspx" /><category term="broodmare value" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/broodmare+value/default.aspx" /><category term="foal order" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/foal+order/default.aspx" /><category term="mare age" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/mare+age/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Leading Sires Capitalize on Strong Books</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/09/18/leading-sires-capitalize-on-strong-books.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/09/18/leading-sires-capitalize-on-strong-books.aspx</id><published>2014-09-18T14:30:00Z</published><updated>2014-09-18T14:30:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As has been previously discussed in &lt;i&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt;, Comparable Index (CI) and Class Performance Index (CPI) are useful tools for breeders and buyers to estimate a stallion's level of mare support, but the figures can sometimes be misleading due to factors such as outliers and mare age.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shown below are the top 10 sires by 2004 CI and the stakes winner percentage for the resulting crop of racehorses. With the exception of Fusaichi Pegasus, whose 2004 crop was only his third, the stallions below were in the middle or near the end of illustrious careers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="512" height="334" align="" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/top-ten-sires.jpg" border="0" vspace="0" hspace="-1" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/top-ten-sires.jpg"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Storm Cat had the highest CI at 8.85 for a crop that ultimately included eight stakes winners (9.0%) from 89 foals. Danzig led by percentage of stakes winners (20%) with his penultimate crop of 30 foals. A.P. Indy was second by CI with 7.34 and had 17% stakes winners in a crop of 78.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The chart below shows A.P. Indy's career from 1998-2011&amp;nbsp;by crop CI and stakes winner percentage. A.P. Indy sired a high percentage of stakes winners earlier in his career while being supported with strong books, but the correlation between CI and stakes winners became more erratic when mare quality was less consistent and book sizes declined.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="511" height="274" align="" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/a.p.indy-ci.jpg" border="0" vspace="0" hspace="-1" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/a.p.indy-ci.jpg"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=646359" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>itapp@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/itapp_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="The Blood-Horse MarketWatch" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/The+Blood-Horse+MarketWatch/default.aspx" /><category term="The Blood-Horse MarketWatch Blog" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/The+Blood-Horse+MarketWatch+Blog/default.aspx" /><category term="MarketWatch" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/MarketWatch/default.aspx" /><category term="Thoroughbred sires" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Thoroughbred+sires/default.aspx" /><category term="Thoroughbred breeding theory" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Thoroughbred+breeding+theory/default.aspx" /><category term="Thoroughbred dams" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Thoroughbred+dams/default.aspx" /><category term="mares bred" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/mares+bred/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Finding Value in Young Sires at Keeneland September</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/08/20/finding-value-in-young-sires-at-keeneland-september.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/08/20/finding-value-in-young-sires-at-keeneland-september.aspx</id><published>2014-08-20T17:00:00Z</published><updated>2014-08-20T17:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yearlings by young and unproven sires can be a risky investments, but those by proven sires tend to be more costly. Consequently, weighing the risks against the potential returns may seem like a rock and a hard place situation for value-seeking buyers at the yearling sales.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/em&gt; looked at first- through fifth-crop yearlings at Keeneland September from 2002-11 to determine which crop offered the best ROI for buyers based on sales price and eventual racetrack earnings.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="618" height="273" align="middle" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/p16c-ROI.jpg" border="0" vspace="0" hspace="-1" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/p16c-ROI.jpg"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While no crop offered a positive ROI for all yearlings sold, third-crop yearlings had the best ROI at -9.4%. Fifth-crop yearlings were the worst option for buyers, posting a -22% ROI.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since better racemares tend to be better producers, yearlings out of these mares usually bring higher prices at auction. Taking the same pool of yearlings used in the above graph, &lt;i&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; organized all first- through fifth-crop yearlings by their dams' level of best race to determine which group offered the best return for yearling buyers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="618" height="265" align="middle" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/p16b-FirstFifth.jpg" border="0" vspace="0" hspace="-1" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/p16b-FirstFifth.jpg"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 
&lt;p&gt;Yearlings out of grade I-winning mares easily brought the highest average prices, but their ROI of -54% suggests that prices have more to do with potential breeding value than with potential racetrack earnings. The highest ROI actually came from yearlings out of winning mares, and with an average price 65% lower than that of yearlings out of grade I winners, they generated the only positive ROI of any category at 1.5%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking specifically at third-crop yearlings (the crop that recorded the best ROI) by dams' level of best race, the graph below shows that yearlings out of winning mares offer the highest ROI at 14%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="614" height="273" align="middle" alt="" src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/p16a-ThirdCrop.jpg" border="0" vspace="0" hspace="-1" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/p16a-ThirdCrop.jpg"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  

&lt;p&gt;This year's catalog has 93 yearlings that are by third-crop sires and out of winning mares, including 17 by current leading second-crop sire Pioneerof the Nile.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=645423" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="yearlings" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/yearlings/default.aspx" /><category term="Keeneland September Yearling sale" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Keeneland+September+Yearling+sale/default.aspx" /><category term="ROI" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/ROI/default.aspx" /><category term="Young Sires" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Young+Sires/default.aspx" /><category term="yearling averages" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/yearling+averages/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Buyers Reward Quick Breeze Times</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/07/24/buyers-reward-quick-breeze-times.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/07/24/buyers-reward-quick-breeze-times.aspx</id><published>2014-07-24T18:45:00Z</published><updated>2014-07-24T18:45:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;As mentioned in an &lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/25/juvenile-sales-offer-better-return-for-buyers.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;earlier post on 2-year-old ROR&lt;/a&gt;, sales 2-year-olds as a whole achieve a higher rate of return in racetrack earnings than sales yearlings largely because buyers are able to see at least one workout before purchasing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since workouts have a significant effect on buyers' decisions, &lt;I&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/I&gt; used the breeze times and sales prices of 2-year-olds in training offered at the Ocala Breeders' Sales Co.'s March sale, OBS April, and OBS June from 2011-14 to illustrate the relationship between breeze time and sales price.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The charts below include all 2-year-olds that breezed an eighth of a mile and were offered at the sales listed above. While only a small number of horses breezed a furlong faster than 10 seconds (1.1% of all sold), this group realized the highest average and included the highest-priced 2-year-old of these sales, a $1.8 million colt that breezed an eighth in 9.8 seconds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;TABLE&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;A href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/2yo-price-workout-lg.jpg" target=_blank&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/2yo-price-workout-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/2yo-price-workout-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/2yo-price-workout-lg.jpg" target=_blank&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;SMALL&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/SMALL&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;TABLE&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;A href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/2yo-price-workout-zoom-lg.jpg" target=_blank&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/2yo-price-workout-zoom-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/2yo-price-workout-zoom-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/2yo-price-workout-zoom-lg.jpg" target=_blank&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;SMALL&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/SMALL&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;BR&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The average sales price for a juvenile with a breeze time under 10 seconds is $236,042, 76% higher than horses breezing in exactly 10 seconds. The graphs show that average price steadily declines as breeze times get slower.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A time of 10.4 seconds appears to be the threshold beyond which buyers are reluctant to pay top dollar. No horse that breezed slower than 10.4 seconds realized a price greater than $420,000, while each of the faster time categories had at least one million-dollar hip. Average sales price decreased dramatically (-69%) between horses that breezed an eighth in 10.4 seconds and those that breezed in 10.6 seconds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=644299" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="The Blood-Horse MarketWatch" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/The+Blood-Horse+MarketWatch/default.aspx" /><category term="The Blood-Horse MarketWatch Blog" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/The+Blood-Horse+MarketWatch+Blog/default.aspx" /><category term="MarketWatch" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/MarketWatch/default.aspx" /><category term="juveniles" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/juveniles/default.aspx" /><category term="2-year-olds" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2-year-olds/default.aspx" /><category term="Thoroughbred auctions" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Thoroughbred+auctions/default.aspx" /><category term="buyers" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/buyers/default.aspx" /><category term="2yos" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2yos/default.aspx" /><category term="juvenile sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/juvenile+sales/default.aspx" /><category term="under tack works" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/under+tack+works/default.aspx" /><category term="2-year-old in training sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2-year-old+in+training+sales/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Leading Yearling Sales by Racing Performance</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/06/18/leading-yearling-sales-by-racing-performance.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/06/18/leading-yearling-sales-by-racing-performance.aspx</id><published>2014-06-18T15:00:00Z</published><updated>2014-06-18T15:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fasig-Tipton's July yearling sale marks the beginning of the yearling sale season in North America. In the June issue of &lt;i&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt;, we review the success of major yearling sales based on the racing performance of the yearlings they offered. The charts below illustrate the quality of yearlings offered based on the best level of race the yearlings offered from 2009-11 achieved. Yearling sales that grossed at least $3 million in 2013 were included; "All" includes all yearlings offered in North America from 2009-11.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-sales-level-of-best-race-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-sales-level-of-best-race-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-sales-level-of-best-race-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-sales-level-of-best-race-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not surprisingly, the select sales and the two select sessions at Keeneland September have the highest percentages of stakes winners from yearlings offered. Fasig-Tipton's Saratoga select sale had the highest percentage of both stakes winners (9.1%) and graded stakes winners (5.3%). Keeneland September's select sessions, however, had the highest percentage of grade I winners with 1.6%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-sales-stakes-winners-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-sales-stakes-winners-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-sales-stakes-winners-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-sales-stakes-winners-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=643032" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Fasig-Tipton Saratoga" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Fasig-Tipton+Saratoga/default.aspx" /><category term="Keeneland September" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Keeneland+September/default.aspx" /><category term="Yearling Sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Yearling+Sales/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Belmont Stakes Slowing Down, Epsom Derby Speeding Up</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/06/10/belmont-stakes-slowing-down-epsom-derby-speeding-up.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/06/10/belmont-stakes-slowing-down-epsom-derby-speeding-up.aspx</id><published>2014-06-10T14:30:00Z</published><updated>2014-06-10T14:30:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By Byron Rogers, &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/Perf_Genetics" target="_blank"&gt;@Perf_Genetics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This weekend saw the running of two classics—one on each side of the Atlantic—run over roughly the same distance. The Belmont Stakes (gr. I), run in New York at Belmont Park over 12 furlongs, was won in a stirring finish by Tonalist, and the Epsom Derby (Eng-I), run at Epsom Racecource in England over an undulating 12 furlongs and 10 yards, was won in a dominant fashion by the well bred Australia.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;American racegoers were given a respite from the 2:30+ times of the past four runnings of the Belmont; Tonalist completed the distance in 2:28.52, which is right on the average time of the past 50 Belmonts (2:28.65). At Epsom, Australia completed the testing circuit in 2:33.63, which was a full 2.5 seconds faster than the 50-year average for the Derby and the fifth fastest time in the past 50 years behind the insanely fast effort of Workforce in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Workforce actually ran faster (2:31.30) than the Belmont Stakes winner Drosselmeyer (2:31.60) that year, which is the only time in the last 50 years that this has occurred. In fact, the average time difference between the races puts the Derby 7.5 seconds slower than the Belmont. Plotting the raw winning times of the Belmont Stakes and Epsom Derby for the past 50 years (1965-2014) makes interesting viewing and shows that the gap in time between these races is starting to narrow.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/belmont-epsom-times-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/belmont-epsom-times-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/belmont-epsom-times-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/belmont-epsom-times-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Based on the data and the linear trend line generated, the Derby winner is getting considerably faster. Even if we drop out the inordinately slow times of Teenoso and Shergar, the trend for the Derby over the past 50 years still heads towards a one-second improvement in raw times over the period.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Visually the Belmont finishing time data looks as though it is just getting marginally slower over the same period, but the reality is that it appears that way due to two outliers in Secretariat (2:24) and High Echelon (2:34), and removing these outliers paints a different picture.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/belmont-time-no-outliers-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/belmont-time-no-outliers-sm.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/belmont-time-no-outliers-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/belmont-time-no-outliers-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From the chart above you can see that the linear trend of the data suggests that over the past 50 years the Belmont winner is trending slower by about a second, or six lengths in handicapping terms.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Explaining the decline or improvement in raw time isn't easy to do. Like a lot of things, there is probably a lot of correlation between some theories (introduction of Lasix; increase in inbreeding; alteration of training techniques; track management; value of race; etc.) with the change in raw times. But correlation doesn't mean causation, and much to the dissatisfaction of many, given the long time it takes to measure change in the Thoroughbred, establishing the true cause(s) may not ever be achieved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=642615" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Belmont Stakes" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Belmont+Stakes/default.aspx" /><category term="race times" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/race+times/default.aspx" /><category term="Epsom Derby" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Epsom+Derby/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Skipping the Preakness Increasingly Popular for Derby Starters</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/05/14/skipping-the-preakness-increasingly-popular-for-derby-starters.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/05/14/skipping-the-preakness-increasingly-popular-for-derby-starters.aspx</id><published>2014-05-14T18:00:00Z</published><updated>2014-05-14T18:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since 1973, an average of five Kentucky Derby (gr. I) starters have ran back in the Preakness Stakes (gr. I). By that standard, this year's class of sophomores is under-performing, with only three Derby runners—California Chrome (first), Ride On Curlin (seventh), and General a Rod (11th)—are likely to start in the Preakness. Derby starters have dominated the Preakness and Belmont Stakes (gr. I) since 1973, so their absence from the Preakness may be good news for the newcomers.&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/triple-crown-starters-venn.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/triple-crown-starters-venn.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/triple-crown-starters-venn.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/triple-crown-starters-venn.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the past 41 years, 28% of Kentucky Derby starters also ran in the Preakness, and 26% ran in the Belmont. Derby runners have accounted for 72% of the top-three finishers and 74% of the winners of the Preakness and Belmont during that time. Derby starters also have a better average finish position in these races compared to horses that didn't start in the Derby.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;table border="1"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Avg. Finish &lt;br&gt;in Preakness&lt;br&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Avg. Finish &lt;br&gt;in Belmont&lt;br&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;All Derby Starters&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;4.67&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;4.63&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;All Non-Derby Starters&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;6.88&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;6.41&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Derby Winners&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2.57&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;3.00&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite the good record of Derby runners in the Preakness and Belmont, sending a horse to all three events has become unpopular, as illustrated in the chart below. There has been a slight increase in the past three years, thanks to three horses in both 2011 (Animal Kingdom, Shackleford, and Mucho Macho Man) and 2013 (Orb, Oxbow, and Will Take Charge) starting in all three events, but overall there has been a distinctive decline in the percentage of Derby starters to contest all three races.&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-preakness-belmont-starters-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-preakness-belmont-starters-lg.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-preakness-belmont-starters-lg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-preakness-belmont-starters-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-preakness-starters-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-preakness-starters-lg.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-preakness-starters-lg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-preakness-starters-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-belmont-starters-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-belmont-starters-lg.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-belmont-starters-lg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/derby-belmont-starters-lg.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The percentage of Derby-Preakness runners has remained steady over this time period, but the trend of skipping the Preakness and waiting for the Belmont is growing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seven of the 14 horses in the 2013 Belmont field followed the Derby-Belmont pattern, including winner Palace Malice, and five of the the past 10 Belmont winners skipped the Preakness after starting in the Derby.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several Derby contenders that opted out of this year's Preakness are under consideration for the Belmont, including Commanding Curve, Danza, Wicked Strong, and Samraat, who finished second, third, fourth, and fifth, respectively, in the Derby. Considering the recent record of Derby runners in the Belmont, this is setting up to be a contentious conclusion to the Triple Crown series.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=627213" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Kentucky Derby" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Kentucky+Derby/default.aspx" /><category term="Belmont Stakes" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Belmont+Stakes/default.aspx" /><category term="Triple Crown" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Triple+Crown/default.aspx" /><category term="preakness stakes" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/preakness+stakes/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Debunking the Curse of Apollo?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/04/24/debunking-the-curse-of-apollo.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/04/24/debunking-the-curse-of-apollo.aspx</id><published>2014-04-24T18:30:00Z</published><updated>2014-04-24T18:30:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Not since Apollo in 1882 has a horse that was unraced at age 2 gone on to win the Kentucky Derby (gr. I). The famed "Curse of Apollo" will be put to the test once again this year, this time by Rebel Stakes (gr. II) winner Hoppertunity. Many argue that the right horse just hasn't come along yet, and it's only a matter of time until the curse is broken. But others are adamant that the maturity gained during a 2-year-old campaign is essential for a Derby victory.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The charts below compare horses that raced at 2 with those that did not and their subsequent performance in 3-year-old graded stakes from 1973-2013. During this period, 73% of graded stakes starters raced at age 2, while 27% were unraced as 2-year-olds. If "having a 2-year-old foundation" is important for graded stakes performance at 3, then we should expect a higher proportion of 3-year-old graded stakes winners to have raced at 2. This is the case, but only by a 2.2% margin: 75% of 3-year-old graded stakes winners raced at 2 compared to 25% who didn't.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/3yo-gs-starters-large.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/3yo-gs-starters-small.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/3yo-gs-starters-small.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/3yo-gs-starters-large.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/3yo-gsw-large.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/3yo-gsw-small.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/3yo-gsw-small.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/3yo-gsw-large.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Isolating only the Kentucky Derby starters, horses that raced at 2 also have a slight advantage. Though 8.4% of all Kentucky Derby starters since 1973 were unraced at 2, only 6.5% of in-the-money finishers were unraced at 2. This 1.9% differential again suggests a slight disadvantage for 3-year-olds lacking a 2-year-old foundation.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ky-derby-starters-large.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ky-derby-starters-small.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ky-derby-starters-small.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ky-derby-starters-large.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ky-derby-top-3-large.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ky-derby-top-3-small.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ky-derby-top-3-small.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/other-charts/ky-derby-top-3-large.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;P&gt;While it seems that whether a racehorse begins its career at 2 or at 3 has only a small impact on 3-year-old graded stakes performance, the fact remains that it has been 132 years since a horse that was unraced at 2 went on to win the Kentucky Derby.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The most likely reason for Apollo's curse still holding strong is simply because there have been so few to challenge it. In the past 31 years, only 55 horses that were unraced at 2 even competed in the Derby. Since 2000, horses without a 2-year-old start have finished second (Bodemeister, 2012), third (Curlin, 2007), fourth (Atswhatimtalknbout, 2003), and fifth (Wheelaway, 2000) in the classic. It likely is only a matter of time before Apollo's curse is broken.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=610185" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="Kentucky Derby" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Kentucky+Derby/default.aspx" /><category term="2-year-olds" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2-year-olds/default.aspx" /><category term="Triple Crown" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Triple+Crown/default.aspx" /><category term="graded stakes" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/graded+stakes/default.aspx" /><category term="unraced at 2" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/unraced+at+2/default.aspx" /><category term="3-year-olds" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/3-year-olds/default.aspx" /><category term="curse of apollo" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/curse+of+apollo/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx</id><published>2014-03-27T14:30:00Z</published><updated>2014-03-27T14:30:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;i&gt;By Ian Tapp&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Given that so much of our discussion and analysis goes to sires—leading sires, new sires, broodmare sires, undervalued sires—the March issue of &lt;i&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; is our opportunity to look more in depth at some of the top producers from the previous year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/broodmare-of-the-year/2013/MarketWatch-Broodmare-of-the-Year-2013.pdf" mce_href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/broodmare-of-the-year/2013/MarketWatch-Broodmare-of-the-Year-2013.pdf"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/broodmare-of-the-year/2013/broodmare-cover-2014.jpg" alt="" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/broodmare-of-the-year/2013/broodmare-cover-2014.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="337" hspace="15" vspace="4" width="250"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's not that mares are any less important than stallions, but given the fact that they can produce far fewer foals in their lifetime than can stallions, broodmares are more challenging to study statistically on an individual basis.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We typically group mares by their level of best race and best produce, but as a mare's accomplishments change, so does her value.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One extreme example is &lt;i&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; broodmare of the year nominee Life Happened, who was unraced, not pregnant, and her only foal to race was a one-time winner when she sold for $4,500 to Machmer Hall Thoroughbreds at the 2008 Keeneland November sale.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Earlier this year at Keeneland January, after three of her foals had won or placed in graded stakes and her ability to produce was known, Life Happened sold for $750,000 in foal to Harlan's Holiday. That sales price represented roughly a 15,000% return for Machmer Hall, who also sold three yearlings out of Life Happened for a combined $385,000.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/broodmare-of-the-year/2013/MarketWatch-Broodmare-of-the-Year-2013.pdf" target="_blank" mce_href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/broodmare-of-the-year/2013/MarketWatch-Broodmare-of-the-Year-2013.pdf"&gt;downloadable report&lt;/a&gt; we profile the 10 &lt;i&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; broodmare of the year nominees, including Life Happened. To be a candidate, a broodmare had to have produced a graded stakes winner in 2013 plus at least one other graded stakes winner in her career. The 10 finalists include eight grade I producers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Our writers this year include &lt;i&gt;The Blood-Horse&lt;/i&gt; editorial staff members Eric Mitchell, Evan Hammonds, and Tom Hall, &lt;i&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; associate editor Nicole Sauer, and contributors Avalyn Hunter and Alan Porter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The &lt;i&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; broodmare of the year is determined by popular vote. After reading the profiles, please cast your vote below for the broodmare you feel most deserves this distinction. Voting closes April 13.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Profiles this year include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ava Knowsthecode&lt;/b&gt;, by Tom Hall&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Clear Mandate&lt;/b&gt;, by Avalyn Hunter&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Enchanted Rock&lt;/b&gt;, by Ian Tapp&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hookedonthefeelin&lt;/b&gt;, by Tom Hall&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Life Happened&lt;/b&gt;, by Evan Hammonds&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Lyrical Prayer&lt;/b&gt;, by Nicole Sauer&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Rehear&lt;/b&gt;, by Alan Porter&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Rhumb Line&lt;/b&gt;, by Avalyn Hunter&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Serena's Cat&lt;/b&gt;, by Eric Mitchell&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Take Charge Lady&lt;/b&gt;, by Alan Porter&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/broodmare-of-the-year/2013/MarketWatch-Broodmare-of-the-Year-2013.pdf" target="_blank" mce_href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/broodmare-of-the-year/2013/MarketWatch-Broodmare-of-the-Year-2013.pdf"&gt;Download the free report today: &lt;i&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/i&gt; Broodmare of the Year&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/7917781.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;noscript&gt;&lt;a href="http://polldaddy.com/poll/7917781/"&gt;Vote for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=587509" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>itapp@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/itapp_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="broodmares" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/broodmares/default.aspx" /><category term="serena's cat" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/serena_2700_s+cat/default.aspx" /><category term="enchanted rock" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/enchanted+rock/default.aspx" /><category term="rehear" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/rehear/default.aspx" /><category term="MarketWatch broodmare of the year" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/MarketWatch+broodmare+of+the+year/default.aspx" /><category term="lyrical prayer" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/lyrical+prayer/default.aspx" /><category term="life happened" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/life+happened/default.aspx" /><category term="ava knowsthecode" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/ava+knowsthecode/default.aspx" /><category term="clear mandate" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/clear+mandate/default.aspx" /><category term="take charge lady" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/take+charge+lady/default.aspx" /><category term="hookedonthefeelin" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/hookedonthefeelin/default.aspx" /><category term="rhumb line" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/rhumb+line/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Juvenile Sales Offer Better Return for Buyers</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/25/juvenile-sales-offer-better-return-for-buyers.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/25/juvenile-sales-offer-better-return-for-buyers.aspx</id><published>2014-03-25T18:00:00Z</published><updated>2014-03-25T18:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;i&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Buyers at 2-year-olds in training sales have at least one distinct advantage over yearling buyers: they get to see the horses perform. As a result, 2-year-olds are typically sold at prices that more realistically reflect their potential racetrack performance (measured by earnings). Meanwhile, yearling prices can be inflated due to the premium placed on pedigree (bloodstock value).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From the 2005-07 foal crops at the major North American sales, 17,069 horses were sold as yearlings and 5,360 as 2-year-olds. Excluding unraced horses, each group had comparable average earnings: $66,926/starter for yearlings vs. $64,476/starter for 2-year-olds, a gap of only 3.7%. But there was a greater disparity in average sales price—yearlings averaged $80,663, 29% more than the 2-year-old average of $60,313.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-2yo-avgs-lg-chart.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-2yo-avgs-sm-chart.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-2yo-avgs-sm-chart.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-2yo-avgs-lg-chart.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The rate of return (ROR) for each group suggests that 2-year-old buyers are more accurate in determining racetrack value. The ROR for sold yearlings from 2005-07 was -43%; the ROR for sold 2-year-olds was -6.1%, 37% better than the yearlings. The larger percentage of unraced horses from sold yearlings distorts the number slightly, but 2-year-olds still fared better when comparing the ROR of starters only: 6.9% for juveniles and -17% for yearlings.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In total, 43% of the 2-year-olds sold eventually earned back their purchase price compared to just 35% of yearlings.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-2yo-rors-lg-chart.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-2yo-rors-sm-chart.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-2yo-rors-sm-chart.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/yrlg-2yo-rors-lg-chart.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Listed below are the top five graded stakes winners by ROR for yearling and 2-year-old sales from the 2005-07 foal crops.&lt;/p&gt;
Yearling Sales:
&lt;table border="1"&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Horse&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Sale&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Year&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Sale Price&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Earnings&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;ROR&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Blind Luck&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;FTKJUL&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2008&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$11,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$3,279,520&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;29,714%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Mine That Bird&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;FTKOCT&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2007&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$9,500&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$2,248,496&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;23,568%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Evening Jewel&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEESEP&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2008&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$8,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$1,221,399&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;15,167%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;General Quarters&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEESEP&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2007&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$20,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$1,226,655&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;6,033%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Big Brown&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;FTKOCT&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2006&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$60,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$3,614,500&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;5,924%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
2-Year-Old in Training Sales:
&lt;table border="1"&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Horse&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Sale&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Year&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Sale Price&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Earnings&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;ROR&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Musical Romance&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;OBSAPR&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2009&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$22,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$1,681,885&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;7,545%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Haynesfield&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEEAPR&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2008&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$20,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$1,319,481&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;6,497%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Kara's Orientation&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEEAPR&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2009&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$7,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$455,127&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;6,402%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Secret Gypsy&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;FTMMAY&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2007&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$10,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$596,926&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;5,869%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Homeboykris&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;OBSMAR&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2009&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$11,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$457,109&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;4,056%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=570134" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="2-year-olds" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2-year-olds/default.aspx" /><category term="yearlings" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/yearlings/default.aspx" /><category term="pinhooks" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/pinhooks/default.aspx" /><category term="Yearling Sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Yearling+Sales/default.aspx" /><category term="rate of return" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/rate+of+return/default.aspx" /><category term="2-year-old in training sales" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/2-year-old+in+training+sales/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Comparing 2014 Freshman Sires to Previous Champion First-Crop Sires</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/02/25/comparing-2014-freshman-sires-to-previous-champion-first-crop-sires.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/02/25/comparing-2014-freshman-sires-to-previous-champion-first-crop-sires.aspx</id><published>2014-02-25T15:30:00Z</published><updated>2014-02-25T15:30:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;i&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Trying to pinpoint which of the newest crop of sires will be most successful is a difficult proposition for even the most skilled horsemen. At this point in a stallion's career, there are few statistics that can reliably isolate the leading contenders. The size of the first foal crop, first-crop CI, and first-crop CPI are three of the main figures that breeders and buyers use to gauge the potential of a stallion's first crop.&lt;/P&gt;
 
&lt;P&gt;To determine trends that might identify 2014 freshman sire standouts, &lt;I&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/I&gt; found the minimum and average figures achieved in first-crop foals, CI, and CPI for the leading freshman sires from 2003-13.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;center&gt;
&lt;table border="1"&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;center&gt;First-Crop&lt;BR&gt;Foals&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;center&gt;First-Crop&lt;BR&gt;CI&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;center&gt;First-Crop&lt;BR&gt;CPI&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Minimum&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;45&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;1.14&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;1.41&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Average&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;92&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;2.48&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;3.99&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/center&gt; 
 
&lt;P&gt;Of 2014's 74 freshman sires, 19 met or exceeded the minimum figures. Only Eskendereya, Lookin At Lucky, and Quality Road exceeded the averages in all three categories. The table below lists each sire that met or exceeded all minimum figures. A green check indicates that the sire met or exceeded the average figure, while the red 'x' indicates that the sire fell short of the average.&lt;/P&gt;
                                        
&lt;center&gt;
&lt;table border="1"&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Sire&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;center&gt;Foals&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;center&gt;CI&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;center&gt;CPI&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Blame&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Concord Point&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Desert Party&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Discreetly Mine&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Eskendereya&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Hold Me Back&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Kantharos&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Line of David&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Lookin At Lucky&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Majesticperfection&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Midshipman&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Munnings&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Quality Road&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Summer Bird&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Super Saver&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Tale of Ekati&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Temple City&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Tizdejavu&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Warrior's Reward&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/green%20check.jpg.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/red%20x.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/center&gt; 
 
&lt;P&gt;Presumably, the sires that are above average in these categories will have an advantage as their first 2-year-olds begin racing this year, but overlooked freshman sires (Posse, Congrats, Offlee Wild, etc.) often top the year-end list. Since 2001, none of the stallions that led their crops by either CI or CPI became leading freshman sire; Blame (leader by CI) and Quality Road (leader by CPI) will look to break that trend this season.&lt;/P&gt;
 &lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=557071" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="MarketWatch" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/MarketWatch/default.aspx" /><category term="first-crop Thoroughbred sires" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/first-crop+Thoroughbred+sires/default.aspx" /><category term="first-crop sires" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/first-crop+sires/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>In Utero Foals: November vs. January</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/01/17/in-utero-foals-november-vs-january.aspx" /><id>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/01/17/in-utero-foals-november-vs-january.aspx</id><published>2014-01-17T13:00:00Z</published><updated>2014-01-17T13:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;i&gt;By Nicole Sauer&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Keeneland's November sale is the largest grossing breeding stock sale in North America, and the perception seems to be that it includes higher quality stock than Keeneland January. The 80% difference in average sale price of in-foal mares between the two sales can be accounted for by November's typically younger and/or more proven broodmares, especially those in Book 1. However, the resulting foals (only those sold in utero) from all mares show that the difference in average performance is not as great as the sale price might imply.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;table border="0" cellSpacing="0" cellPadding="5" width="185" align="center"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keeneland-sales-price-earnings-per-str-lg-chart.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keeneland-sales-price-earnings-per-str.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keeneland-sales-price-earnings-per-str.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keeneland-sales-price-earnings-per-str-lg-chart.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;MarketWatch&lt;/I&gt; examined the track performance of all foals sold in utero at Keeneland November and Keeneland January over a five-year span (includes only horses reported foaled in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and Japan). While the disparity in average sale price for these foals is large, there is only a 13% gap in earnings per starter: Keeneland November foals averaged $67,790 per starter, while Keeneland January foals averaged $59,721.&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;table border="0" cellSpacing="0" cellPadding="5" width="185" align="center"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-level-of-best-race-lg-chart.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-level-of-best-race.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-level-of-best-race.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keenov-level-of-best-race-lg-chart.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Keeneland November produced better percentages in nearly all performance categories, but seven of those were separated by less than 1%. That sale has proven more successful at getting high-quality runners, producing 6.1% stakes winners and graded stakes horses, 1.5% better than Keeneland January's figure of 4.6%. However, the sales produced nearly identical percentages of grade I winners, with 0.5% grade I winners at Keeneland November and 0.4% at Keeneland January. While November again has the better percentage, on average the dams of those grade I winners sold at November cost nearly 200% more than those sold in January, indicating that better value may be found in January.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;table border="0" cellSpacing="0" cellPadding="5" width="185" align="center"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keejan-level-of-best-race-lg-chart.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keejan-level-of-best-race.jpg" mce_src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keejan-level-of-best-race.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/sale-charts/keejan-level-of-best-race-lg-chart.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Click for larger graph&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Keeneland's November sale has a slight edge when it comes to high-quality runners, but these sales are nearly equal in their capability of producing runners from in utero foals. Some of the most successful horses sold in-utero at each sale are listed below.&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;table border="1"&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Horse&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Sale&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Year&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Sale Price&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Panty Raid&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEENOV&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2003&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$17,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Flat Out&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEENOV&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2005&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$5,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Super Saver&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEENOV&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2006&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$160,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Mucho Macho Man&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEENOV&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2007&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$33,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Octave&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEEJAN&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2004&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$230,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Gio Ponti&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEEJAN&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2005&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$250,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Rail Trip&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEEJAN&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2005&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$70,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Plum Pretty&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;KEEJAN&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2008&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$170,000&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=530151" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nsauer@bloodhorse.com</name><uri>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/members/nsauer_4000_bloodhorse.com.aspx</uri></author><category term="The Blood-Horse MarketWatch" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/The+Blood-Horse+MarketWatch/default.aspx" /><category term="The Blood-Horse MarketWatch Blog" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/The+Blood-Horse+MarketWatch+Blog/default.aspx" /><category term="MarketWatch" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/MarketWatch/default.aspx" /><category term="Thoroughbred auctions" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Thoroughbred+auctions/default.aspx" /><category term="Keeneland" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Keeneland/default.aspx" /><category term="breeding stock" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/breeding+stock/default.aspx" /><category term="Keeneland November" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Keeneland+November/default.aspx" /><category term="Keeneland January" scheme="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/tags/Keeneland+January/default.aspx" /></entry></feed>