<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Fourth-Crop Yearlings Offer Best ROI for Young Sires</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2013/09/14/fourth-crop-yearlings-offer-best-roi-for-young-sires.aspx</link><description>Buying yearlings by young stallions is always a high-risk investment. Young stallions are largely unproven as sires, which means that the market is less accurate in its valuation of their progeny.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Fourth-Crop Yearlings Offer Best ROI for Young Sires</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2013/09/14/fourth-crop-yearlings-offer-best-roi-for-young-sires.aspx#452559</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:11:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:452559</guid><dc:creator>Ian Tapp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you, Sceptre. Nicole Sauer is also here so it will be a team effort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regarding the stallions used in the graphs above, they are--like you say--all successful stallions. So if a yearling buyer believes that a particular fourth-crop yearling sire is truly a successful sire (and not just a 1-crop wonder), then I think there's value in buying from the 4th crop. But that's the challenging thing to figure out...is the stallion legit or not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=452559" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Fourth-Crop Yearlings Offer Best ROI for Young Sires</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2013/09/14/fourth-crop-yearlings-offer-best-roi-for-young-sires.aspx#452229</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 18:11:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:452229</guid><dc:creator>sceptre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ian,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly, congratulations on your new position. I&amp;#39;m sure you&amp;#39;ll excel here as you did with TrueNicks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, I stand corrected. The higher prices for the 5th crop are probably more a function of &amp;nbsp;better (dam) catalogue page than increased body of work by sire. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=452229" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Fourth-Crop Yearlings Offer Best ROI for Young Sires</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2013/09/14/fourth-crop-yearlings-offer-best-roi-for-young-sires.aspx#452213</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:14:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:452213</guid><dc:creator>Ian Tapp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sceptre,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good point regarding the costs. These numbers don't factor in costs of production or training, which decrease the actual ROI for breeder and buyer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The market seems to undervalue the &amp;quot;weak&amp;quot; 4th crop but is willing to pay a premium for the &amp;quot;better bred&amp;quot; 5th crop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does this mean that the market overpays for a big catalog page?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=452213" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Fourth-Crop Yearlings Offer Best ROI for Young Sires</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2013/09/14/fourth-crop-yearlings-offer-best-roi-for-young-sires.aspx#452209</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 16:42:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:452209</guid><dc:creator>sceptre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Take a look at that graph for their 5th crops. For three of the four it demonstrated their worst return on investment. This suggests that we overpay for success...Also, you have restricted your sample to successful stallions. Imagine what the ROI would reveal had it included high initial stud fee failures, or those that became less successful...Lastly, (I) investment should include costs, not merely purchase price. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=452209" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>