<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx</link><description>Download profiles for the 10 MarketWatch broodmare of the year nominees and cast your vote for the most deserving mare.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx#605866</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:30:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:605866</guid><dc:creator>Ian Tapp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats to Take Charge Lady, who has won the MarketWatch broodmare of the year vote with a landslide 75%. Second place was Ava Knowsthecode with 7.9%. Thanks to all who voted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=605866" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx#593147</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:52:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:593147</guid><dc:creator>sceptre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ian,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like your interpretation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What confuses this, all the more, is that for some years-ex. 1965- there are obvious standouts, by any method. In 1965 it was Pocahontas (owing to two top performers for that year-Tom Rolfe and Chieftain). But, as I recall, there was another highly worthy candidate that year-Searching (with her Affectionately and Priceless Gem). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=593147" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx#593031</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:41:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:593031</guid><dc:creator>Ian Tapp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, sceptre. I&amp;#39;d guess that broodmare of the year was intended to correspond with champion sire, which is, right or wrong, determined by progeny earnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To me (personal opinion), the broodmare title should go to a broodmare who had in the same year or previously produced a significant runner (preferably G1 or champion) and then further proved her ability as a producer in 2013 by having a new top runner of similar or greater merit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hypothetically let&amp;#39;s say that in 2014 Better Than Honour produces a new listed SW and Lady Liberty (dam of Orb) produces the champion older mare.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would pick Lady Liberty for broodmare of the year even though Better Than Honour&amp;#39;s overall produce record is more impressive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=593031" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx#592647</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 06:20:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:592647</guid><dc:creator>Brian Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What about Granny Franny? &amp;nbsp;A G1 winner and a 2YO Saratoga stakes winner in the same year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=592647" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx#592405</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 23:47:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:592405</guid><dc:creator>sceptre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ian,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think we&amp;#39;re attempting to locate the broodmare who-as evidenced by the performance of her offspring in the given year-imparted the highest (of all) quality to her runners for that given year. Could be stated, perhaps, more artfully, but I think this should be the sole yardstick-because the award is for &amp;quot;Broodmare Of The YEAR&amp;quot;. It is not a lifetime achievement award, because that&amp;#39;s not its title. There&amp;#39;s enough ambiguity even within my definition for it to be unwise to add to it by reflecting on past year&amp;#39;s accomplishments. I realize that past and present KY Broodmare Of The Year candidates also didn&amp;#39;t always adhere to &amp;quot;my rule&amp;quot;, and I do admit that their long list of winners is, for the most part, a very distinguished group indeed. It is also a group likely superior to one gained through my method, but, as they say, the end doesn&amp;#39;t alone justify the means. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=592405" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx#592245</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 18:43:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:592245</guid><dc:creator>Ian Tapp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sceptre,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;True, but that will happen anytime you confine an award to &amp;quot;of the year.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we let Leslie&amp;#39;s Lady in again, then we should also have Lisa Danielle again. Beholder repeated as champion; Wise Dan repeated as HOTY.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another worthy mention is Masskana, who is not here because she&amp;#39;s European-based, but Dank was her third G1 winner and fourth SW.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=592245" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx#591717</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:33:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:591717</guid><dc:creator>sceptre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Have to agree with Mookie&amp;#39;s hero. Leslie&amp;#39;s Lady looks better than any on the list. Actually, this group seems a bit weaker than past Broodmare Of Year &amp;quot;nominees&amp;quot;...The more that past record plays into this, the more difficult it becomes to be confident about any BOY list. For example, had Shameful&amp;#39;s Roman Ruler gelding managed to win a black type race in 2013, Shameful would have vaulted to my #1 choice. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=591717" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx#591198</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:30:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:591198</guid><dc:creator>nsauer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Mookie&amp;#39;s Hero,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Leslie&amp;#39;s Lady was considered, and she was nominated last year after Beholder&amp;#39;s Eclipse award-winning 2-year-old season. She was not selected as a finalist because we favored mares who had either new graded stakes winners or new grade I winners in 2013. The only exception was Hookedonthefeelin, whose grade I winner Jimmy Creed earned his first graded win late in 2012 on Dec. 26. However, he followed that up with a win in the grade II Potrero Grande Stakes in April 2013.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=591198" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Voting Open for MarketWatch Broodmare of the Year</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/03/27/voting-open-for-marketwatch-broodmare-of-the-year.aspx#589783</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 22:47:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:589783</guid><dc:creator>Mookie's Hero</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi There&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought Leslie&amp;#39;s Lady would be on this list. Beholder was terrfic and she also had Into Mischief. And now one of ther daughters has produced a stakes winner. She&amp;#39;s as good as the stallions in that her line is just that good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mookie&amp;#39;s Hero&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=589783" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>