<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Leading Sires Capitalize on Strong Books</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/09/18/leading-sires-capitalize-on-strong-books.aspx</link><description>Proven sires reward strong mare support with high percentages of stakes winners.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Leading Sires Capitalize on Strong Books</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/market-watch/archive/2014/09/18/leading-sires-capitalize-on-strong-books.aspx#646422</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:37:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:646422</guid><dc:creator>sceptre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Noticed that the SW/foals % for this group as a whole is fairly high-and isn&amp;#39;t much off that attained by elite sires of yesteryear. But a similar comparison of the former and latter using AEIs would reveal a much different (comparative) outcome. Also, my guess is that CIs for yesteryear&amp;#39;s elite stallions were nearly the same at today&amp;#39;s (elites). Yes, it&amp;#39;s true that today&amp;#39;s elite stallions service far larger books, but why should this, in itself, cause the AEI disparity? &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=646422" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>