<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Internet Gaming Expansion - Where Do We Go From Here?</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/ntra-alex-waldrop-straight-up/archive/2010/07/30/internet-gaming-expansion-where-do-we-go-from-here.aspx</link><description>Yet another challenge for racing and other forms of gaming in the U.S. - international expansion of gambling via the Internet.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Internet Gaming Expansion - Where Do We Go From Here?</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/ntra-alex-waldrop-straight-up/archive/2010/07/30/internet-gaming-expansion-where-do-we-go-from-here.aspx#126228</link><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:45:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:126228</guid><dc:creator>Ole Dave</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A pre-emptive advantage surrounding on-line allowances with such little result doesn’t bode well for the question posed. &amp;nbsp;How ‘bout 1) separating video and wagering rights, 2) adopt an Equibase model to disseminate an industry owned and controlled, espn-like video regional coverage (streaming and cable), 3) commission pre-approved sell-through ‘agents’ and not turn over entire working margins less a few points (maybe extend 5-7% based on volume) and, 4) support the video and approved, independent agents via a cooperative promotional fund. &amp;nbsp;Now such an approach would require the major stakeholders to get on the same page and . . . just forget it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=126228" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>