<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Racing Hub : Kentucky Oaks</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/tags/Kentucky+Oaks/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Kentucky Oaks</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>Rachel Alexandra - The Greatest Filly?</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/2009/05/08/rachel-alexandra-the-greatest-filly.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:44898</guid><dc:creator>cdawahare</dc:creator><slash:comments>217</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=44898</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/2009/05/08/rachel-alexandra-the-greatest-filly.aspx#comments</comments><description>I've heard that comment over the last week with open-ended infinity.  I know our sport wants a star badly, but we have had some awfully good three-year-old fillies that beat much more difficult competition by this time in their career, or they did so throughout their classic-year campaign. ...(&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/2009/05/08/rachel-alexandra-the-greatest-filly.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=44898" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/tags/Becky+Johnston/default.aspx">Becky Johnston</category><category domain="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/tags/Kentucky+Oaks/default.aspx">Kentucky Oaks</category><category domain="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/tags/Rachel+Alexandra/default.aspx">Rachel Alexandra</category></item><item><title>Stardom Bound Too Slow?  Not So Fast My Friend.</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/2009/02/11/stardom-bound-too-slow-not-so-fast-my-friend.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:28769</guid><dc:creator>cdawahare</dc:creator><slash:comments>46</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=28769</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/2009/02/11/stardom-bound-too-slow-not-so-fast-my-friend.aspx#comments</comments><description>There has been some pointed discussion about Stardom Bound's time in her Las Virgenes win on Saturday.  She ran the race in 1:36 2/5 and received speed ratings in the area of 84-87.  To take the time and the rating as the gospel for this race would be the equivalent of reading Cliffs Notes for the Bible, it just doesn't tell the whole story....(&lt;a href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/2009/02/11/stardom-bound-too-slow-not-so-fast-my-friend.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=28769" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/tags/Becky+Johnston/default.aspx">Becky Johnston</category><category domain="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/tags/Kentucky+Oaks/default.aspx">Kentucky Oaks</category><category domain="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/tags/Las+Virgenes/default.aspx">Las Virgenes</category><category domain="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/racinghub/archive/tags/Stardom+Bound/default.aspx">Stardom Bound</category></item></channel></rss>