<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>First Foals -- It's Better to Be a Stallion</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/07/16/first-foals-it-s-better-to-be-a-stallion.aspx</link><description>At the Fasig-Tipton July yearling sale, buyers wanted the first foals from new stallions, but not necessarily the first foals from new broodmares. And naming a yearling before the sale just might cost you.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: First Foals -- It's Better to Be a Stallion</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/07/16/first-foals-it-s-better-to-be-a-stallion.aspx#10362</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:45:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:10362</guid><dc:creator>LCM</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you fail to notice the sales topper was NAMED?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10362" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: First Foals -- It's Better to Be a Stallion</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/07/16/first-foals-it-s-better-to-be-a-stallion.aspx#10358</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:22:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:10358</guid><dc:creator>carrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;the named foals are going to sell for less because usually they are from regional markets. &amp;nbsp;breeders in ky do not in general name their foals but I have found that breeders in florida esp. tend to name their horses as weanlings. &amp;nbsp;With the regional breeding often comes regional sires with lower stud fees and less quality pedigrees, hence the difference in average. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10358" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: First Foals -- It's Better to Be a Stallion</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/07/16/first-foals-it-s-better-to-be-a-stallion.aspx#10339</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:36:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:10339</guid><dc:creator>Wanda</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess you can take a chance on a new sire when the stud fee is low but not when those new sires are crossed on mares with no page. They could be from a good female family but with nothing on the ground or racing it&amp;#39;s hard to justify the money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10339" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>First Foals -- It's Better to Be a Stallion</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/07/16/first-foals-it-s-better-to-be-a-stallion.aspx#10336</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:25:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:10336</guid><dc:creator>The Five-Cross Files</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Blog trackback&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10336" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>