<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Thoroughbred Breeding Benchmark -- Report of Live Foals</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/09/15/thoroughbred-breeding-benchmark-report-of-live-foals.aspx</link><description>The annual report of live foals reveals some interesting shifts in the Thoroughbred breeding industry.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Thoroughbred Breeding Benchmark -- Report of Live Foals</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/09/15/thoroughbred-breeding-benchmark-report-of-live-foals.aspx#30410</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:30410</guid><dc:creator>Elaine K</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Could someone please tell me where&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;to find out about the Rag # and&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;what is represents and how it is&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;calculated. &amp;nbsp;Any explanation or&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;site I could be directed to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scot&amp;#39;s reply&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; The best source of information on Ragozin numbers is the official site:&amp;nbsp; &lt;a class="" href="http://www.thesheets.com/" target="_blank"&gt;TheSheets.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30410" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Thoroughbred Breeding Benchmark -- Report of Live Foals</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/09/15/thoroughbred-breeding-benchmark-report-of-live-foals.aspx#15947</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:07:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:15947</guid><dc:creator>Dennis B</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What happened to Outflanker? &amp;nbsp;I also really liked City Place-that is until I saw his percentage of live foals. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15947" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Thoroughbred Breeding Benchmark -- Report of Live Foals</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/09/15/thoroughbred-breeding-benchmark-report-of-live-foals.aspx#15833</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:58:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:15833</guid><dc:creator>oldgraymare</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does this correlate in any way to the number of COVERS???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m very old and remember when 50 covers was a lot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scot&amp;#39;s reply&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; Nope -- the data in &amp;quot;live foals&amp;quot; means foals reported to The Jockey Club as live births.&amp;nbsp; The &amp;quot;Report of Mares Bred&amp;quot; -- to be released later in the year -- just gives the total number of mares covered at least once.&amp;nbsp; As your comment implies, some mares actually get covered twice, or even three times.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m not aware of any official record of total number of covers that includes multiple breedings with the same mare.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15833" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Thoroughbred Breeding Benchmark -- Report of Live Foals</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/09/15/thoroughbred-breeding-benchmark-report-of-live-foals.aspx#15819</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:29:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:15819</guid><dc:creator>Frank J.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok I&amp;#39;ve looked at stallions names from N-Z. Point Given&amp;#39;s #&amp;#39;s and %&amp;#39;s are pretty low, only 35 foals this year?? And how about Real Quiet?? His foals are pretty much a flip of the coin to live. Same goes for Sarava and Saarland. Doesn&amp;#39;t seem like Skip Away is being bred at all. Same goes for Swain. What&amp;#39;s up with that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15819" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Thoroughbred Breeding Benchmark -- Report of Live Foals</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/09/15/thoroughbred-breeding-benchmark-report-of-live-foals.aspx#15818</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:33:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:15818</guid><dc:creator>sgillies</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I should&amp;#39;ve said... These numbers are estimated to be &amp;quot;90%&amp;quot; complete. &amp;nbsp;Not all breeders have reported their live foals, even this late in the year (!!!) and a handful of U.S.-bred foals are covered on the southern hemisphere schedule, and are due in the next few months.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15818" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Thoroughbred Breeding Benchmark -- Report of Live Foals</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/09/15/thoroughbred-breeding-benchmark-report-of-live-foals.aspx#15816</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:42:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:15816</guid><dc:creator>Davisondad</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I love to pour over the numbers! &amp;nbsp;Some things jump out at me....First the big one, I guess, Storm Cat producing 64% live foals and being pensioned for lack of furtility??? At 500K a pop, that&amp;#39;s a shocker to me!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some Stallions whose numbers were lower than I would have expected:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seeking the Gold &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 50%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Monarchos &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;55%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Northern Afleet &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;56%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cryptoclearance &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;59%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cherokee Run &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 59%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cat Thief &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;59%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Catienus &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 56%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MOnarchos just seems to be too young to be throwing only 55% live foals. &amp;nbsp;You have to ask if we might be seeing the last offspring of these others?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All of us who are reaching middle age have to chear for the likes of Slew City Slew, at 24 is still producing 68% live foals. Not to mention that his fee is great, and his offspring run!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ON the other side, I think Johannesburg is a bit overated to get 195 Mares bred! &amp;nbsp;Songandaprayer 159 Mares Bred???? Sharp Humor 148 for a freshman sire???? Sometimes it is tough to follow what some breeders are thinking!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scot&amp;#39;s reply&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; Great observations!&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Don&amp;#39;t forget with Storm Cat that the 2008 live foals represent his &lt;strong&gt;2007 &lt;/strong&gt;breeding season... his rate of getting mares in foal during the 2008 breeding season was apparently much lower, as we&amp;#39;ll see in next year&amp;#39;s report!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15816" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Thoroughbred Breeding Benchmark -- Report of Live Foals</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/09/15/thoroughbred-breeding-benchmark-report-of-live-foals.aspx#15814</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:15814</guid><dc:creator>Frank J.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok I&amp;#39;m no master at this stuff. Please, if I&amp;#39;m way off let me know cuz I don&amp;#39;t want to feel like an idiot, haha! I downloaded the report and from what I do know here&amp;#39;s what I think just looking at the list from letters A-M. From the sires with 100+ to me I was surprised with Include and Tapit. Alphabet Soup&amp;#39;s #&amp;#39;s and %&amp;#39;s also are alarming as they seem to be descending by year. I&amp;#39;ve never heard of Bay Head King and he&amp;#39;s been bred to more mares than horses like Cat Thief and Skip Away? Cat Thief&amp;#39;s %&amp;#39;s are alarming as well. Congrats as well as Dance with Ravens #&amp;#39;s are surprising to me. What&amp;#39;s with Delaware Township?? Only 18 mares and 9 live foals?? And whatever happened to Event of The Year? Two other horses with huge numbers I didn&amp;#39;t expect are Indian Ocean and Lake Austin. Harlan&amp;#39;s Holidays %&amp;#39;s are a little alarming also.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15814" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>