<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Flip Side of the Bold Ruler / Synthetic Tracks Study</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2009/02/06/the-flip-side-of-the-bold-ruler-synthetic-tracks-study.aspx</link><description>A couple of days ago we looked at how much influence Bold Ruler has had on Thoroughbred racing's top synthetic sires. So the question now is: are his bloodlines less present in poorer-performing all-weather studs?</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: The Flip Side of the Bold Ruler / Synthetic Tracks Study</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2009/02/06/the-flip-side-of-the-bold-ruler-synthetic-tracks-study.aspx#30754</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:20:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:30754</guid><dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting but statistically on shaky ground.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You seem to be making the assumption that all stallions have the equal likelihood of their offspring running on synthetics. &amp;nbsp;In reality, stallions in regional markets where synthetics are prominent will have a larger percentage of running/winning (or not) on synthetics. &amp;nbsp;Look at the leading synthetic sires for 2008--Tribal Rule and Benchmark. &amp;nbsp;Regional stallions (CA) where synthetics are the norm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With that in mind, you might want to try performing this analysis on, say, California stallions only or Kentucky stallions only. &amp;nbsp;With California stallions, it&amp;#39;s pretty fair to say that their get have an equal opportunity to run on synthetic as any other stallion in the state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30754" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Flip Side of the Bold Ruler / Synthetic Tracks Study</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2009/02/06/the-flip-side-of-the-bold-ruler-synthetic-tracks-study.aspx#28567</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:03:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:28567</guid><dc:creator>Tizna</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a fascinating study. &amp;nbsp;The only quibble I have is the smaller size of this second sample. &amp;nbsp;Is there a reason why you chose the cutoff at 12.5% instead of something lower? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Very interesting that it seems to be specifically Bold Ruler who improves all-weather performance. &amp;nbsp;Could this be because of his broodmare sire Discovery, who like Relaunch and In Reality is from the Fair Play line?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=28567" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>