<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Poll Update: Catalog Choices.</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/03/05/poll-update-catalog-choices.aspx</link><description>Let's follow up on a recent poll that asked how you, the readers, look at a page in the sales catalog. Most catalog pages are written to make the horse look good, with emphasis on the sire line and on black type winners in the female family. But those</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Poll Update: Catalog Choices.</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/scot/archive/2008/03/05/poll-update-catalog-choices.aspx#381</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:06:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:381</guid><dc:creator>The Five-Cross Files</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Blog trackback &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=381" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>