<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Successful Preakness Invaders Not Historically Prevalent</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/thoroughbred-bloggers-alliance/archive/2010/05/10/successful-preakness-invaders-not-historically-prevalent.aspx</link><description>Horse racing being the fickle game that it is, makes it difficult to predict entries into a race next week. With that being said, it looks like the Preakness Stakes (gr. 1) will feature a full 14-horse gate when they go to the post May 15.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Successful Preakness Invaders Not Historically Prevalent</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/thoroughbred-bloggers-alliance/archive/2010/05/10/successful-preakness-invaders-not-historically-prevalent.aspx#110651</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 04:12:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:110651</guid><dc:creator>marktoothaker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike Machowsky sure likes his chances with Caracortado, check out what he has to say in short video at&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.thederbydream.com/"&gt;http://www.thederbydream.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=110651" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Successful Preakness Invaders Not Historically Prevalent</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/thoroughbred-bloggers-alliance/archive/2010/05/10/successful-preakness-invaders-not-historically-prevalent.aspx#110358</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 06:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:110358</guid><dc:creator>Ann in Lexington</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ridan did not win the Kentucky Derby in 1962; he ran third. The Derby was won by Decidedly, with Roman Line second.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=110358" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Successful Preakness Invaders Not Historically Prevalent</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/thoroughbred-bloggers-alliance/archive/2010/05/10/successful-preakness-invaders-not-historically-prevalent.aspx#110214</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:56:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:110214</guid><dc:creator>Mary Pitt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Another interesting trend, for what it&amp;#39;s worth, is that, since 1960, every year ending in &amp;#39;0&amp;#39; has had three different winners of the Triple Crown races. Of course, patterns like that are made to be broken, but it wouldn&amp;#39;t surprise me all that much to see it hold up once again this year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=110214" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Successful Preakness Invaders Not Historically Prevalent</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/thoroughbred-bloggers-alliance/archive/2010/05/10/successful-preakness-invaders-not-historically-prevalent.aspx#110173</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 19:32:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:110173</guid><dc:creator>Draynay</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The point is in the last 10 years it has happend several times. &amp;nbsp;Super Saver is not a Super Star and will have his hands full with Hurricane Ike and LAL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=110173" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Successful Preakness Invaders Not Historically Prevalent</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/thoroughbred-bloggers-alliance/archive/2010/05/10/successful-preakness-invaders-not-historically-prevalent.aspx#110147</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 18:18:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:110147</guid><dc:creator>Brock</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp;Decidedly won the 1962 Kentucky Derby.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=110147" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Successful Preakness Invaders Not Historically Prevalent</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/thoroughbred-bloggers-alliance/archive/2010/05/10/successful-preakness-invaders-not-historically-prevalent.aspx#110041</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:06:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:110041</guid><dc:creator>Timothy Leary</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ridan did not win the 1962KY Derby.Decidedly did.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=110041" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>