<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Using TrueNicks to Predict Racetrack Success</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/truenicks/archive/2009/03/05/using-truenicks-to-predict-racetrack-success.aspx</link><description>Byron Rogers introduces a TrueNicks study that will track the 2-year-old crop of several top sires.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Using TrueNicks to Predict Racetrack Success</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/truenicks/archive/2009/03/05/using-truenicks-to-predict-racetrack-success.aspx#35577</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:52:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:35577</guid><dc:creator>Tony Braddock</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Guys&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seems like a good study, looking forward to the results, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and am interested if the results &amp;nbsp;will be apportioned, I mean, if you have 848 sample # of foals with 248 (28%) rated A, then withen that sample A, the potential result could be that you have to rate some top, some mid and some bottom of the A level and then some will not even remain in the A level. &amp;nbsp;The question then will be what facts separate each group,and why etc or am I misunderstanding this. Seems like a good first step I think you may have eluded to this above. Once again my first impresson/ understanding of the study. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=35577" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Using TrueNicks to Predict Racetrack Success</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/truenicks/archive/2009/03/05/using-truenicks-to-predict-racetrack-success.aspx#32388</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:08:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:32388</guid><dc:creator>AnneM</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Just curious as to why no West Coast stallion was chosen - It seems to me that it is almost always Kentucky or Florida based Stallions are used. I for one, would be interested in seeing how 2 and 3 years from Unusual Heat do - He seems to be producing offspring that are winning everywhere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Byron&amp;#39;s Reply: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;Anne. You are right, Unusual Heat is an outstanding stallion. One of the top 10 in North America in my opinion. I didn&amp;#39;t think of him when I proposed the study a while ago, but then I didn&amp;#39;t include other great stallions like A.P Indy and Distorted Humor either. What I was trying to get was stallions with a lot of two-year-olds ready to run this year and the stallions I selected have a lot of representatives so hopefully we should get some interesting results. Thanks for the comment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32388" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Using TrueNicks to Predict Racetrack Success</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/truenicks/archive/2009/03/05/using-truenicks-to-predict-racetrack-success.aspx#32372</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:00:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b1464f20-99eb-45e5-b651-41da03ecff36:32372</guid><dc:creator>Jason Hall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great study guys! &amp;nbsp;Looking forward to following the results as they come in...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32372" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>