<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.bloodhorse.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Belmont Stakes Race Dynamics: Distance trumps traditional handicapping</title><link>http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/unlocking-winners-handicapping/archive/2015/06/03/belmont-stakes-race-dynamics-distance-trumps-traditional-handicapping.aspx</link><description>TimeformUS has Pace and Speed figures for the Belmont Stakes going back through 2004. It isn’t a sample size a statistician would consider sufficient, but it’s worth a look, if only to dispel some of the sillier notions that are out there.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator></channel></rss>