BloodHorse.com

Who Will Be the 3-Year-Old Champion?

120 Comments

Five-plus months of Triple Crown mania ended Saturday when Drosselmeyer scored the Belmont Stakes in upset fashion. It completed a hard-to-figure 3-year-old series in which we not only had three different winners, but also three different runner-ups.

So, what did we learn from the 2010 Triple Crown? Not a whole lot, as far as I can tell. There is still no clear-cut leader in the division.

Last year, we also had three different horses win the Kentucky Derby, Preakness, and Belmont, but the situation was a bit different. By the end of the Triple Crown, we all had a pretty good idea that Rachel Alexandra was the best 3-year-old around, and she proved it emphatically the rest of the year. Summer Bird also went on to have a superb season, giving the 2009 crop a couple of legitimate stars.

It won't be that simple this year. It will take the rest of the summer and likely the fall to determine our 3-year-old champion. I won't go as far to call this a mediocre group just yet--though it certainly has the started out that way, especially after the injury to Eskendereya. I think we need to give them the rest of the year to prove themselves. A few of these horses look like they have the potential to be Summer Bird types--late-bloomers with a lot of upside.

So who will be the 3-year-old champion when all is said and one? Nobody knows for sure, but it's fun to try to predict these things.

It could be argued that the two best 3-year-olds did not even win one of the Triple Crown races. Many would say that First Dude ran the best races in both the Preakness and the Belmont without winning. He took all the heat on the front end while still fighting gamely in the stretch. Obviously a big, strong colt, he looks like he is just getting very good right now.

Fly Down looks like he is finding himself too. He proved that his Dwyer was no fluke by running very well in the Belmont. And he has now finished ahead of First Dude all three times they have met. A good rivalry could be in the works.

Of the three Triple Crown race winners, Lookin At Lucky is certainly the classiest. When he has gotten a decent trip, he has never been beaten. And don't forget, in every year since 2001, the Preakness winner has gone on to be a 3YO champ.The verdict is still out about how good Super Saver and Drosselmeyer can be.

And let's not forget about a very talented horse almost ready to return from injury--Winslow Homer. He had all the looks of a star after the Holy Bull. He is being pointed to all the summer classics.

Hopefully, many of the aforementioned 3-year-olds, as well as Ice Box, Jackson Bend, Sidney's Candy, Noble's Promise, and others will meet in the Jim Dandy, Haskell, Travers, and Breeders' Cup. It probably was not the most exciting Triple Crown we've ever seen, but there is still much to look forward to the rest of the year.

120 Comments:

I'm going with Lucky. I think his bad luck is over & his true form will show through for the rest of this year. He is by far the talent of the crop.

MRO 08 Jun 2010 12:49 PM

super savers got home court advantage in the classic so if every thing goes well and some horses don't show (quality road, Zenyatta ) then i think he'll get the win.

thomas 08 Jun 2010 12:50 PM

I don't expect Drosselmeyer or Super Saver to win another race all year so it would have to be LAL or First Dude and I am still on the First Dude bandwagon.  I think he keeps getting better and better and should see his best stuff this summer.

Draynay 08 Jun 2010 1:13 PM

Lucky certainly would have to be the head of the class but if this thing stays a mediocre bunch what would be wrong with giving D'Funnybone some consideration if he stays on a tear and lets say he wins the Kings Bishop and goes onto a big performance in BC Sprint. Just a thought to kick around.

thederbydream.com 08 Jun 2010 1:21 PM

D'Funnybone has 3 graded wins but he's not even in your poll?  And his wins were dominating compared to the way the horses in your poll have won.

Just because he's a sprinter doesn't mean he should be ignored for 3YO champ, especially if the rest of this crop continues to wallow in the mediocrity they've displayed thus far.  

Regarding a "Summer Bird type late bloomer" showing up this year, keep in mind Summer Bird did not plod through the Belmont like Drosselmeyer  in the slowest time in 15 years [and second slowest time in 66 years].  

In fact all 3 of the 2010 TC races were slow.  Horses don't suddenly become fast after the Triple season is over, so I can't envision any of this crop's "classic distance" dirt horses going on to do anything noteworthy the rest of this year.  Even if one manages to string together another graded win or two, I'll bet they do it in ploddingly slow fashion just as they've done all spring.

In sum, stop ignoring the sprint and turf horses for possible 3YO champ this year.  

Douglas 08 Jun 2010 1:29 PM

Right now I'll stick with Lookin at Lucky but there's a long long way to go.

TerriV 08 Jun 2010 1:39 PM

In my opinion Lookin At Lucky is by far the best. If he had decent trips in all his races, he would be undefeated. Even in the Rebel he had a bad trip and still won. Plus he can run on synthetic and drit.

dbs 08 Jun 2010 1:44 PM

Call it sentiment if you wish, but don't count Lentenor out just yet. ; )

That one will only get better with experience.

He's being aimed towards the Travers last I heard. Will definetly be a race to watch....

Arem 08 Jun 2010 2:11 PM

What are your thoughts on Trappe Shot?  he seems to be coming along real nice...could have some potential stardom heading his way over the summer classics!

PS i've heard lots of hyper about him, but never actually found a race of his to watch online..anyone have any links?  thanks!!

Lucy 08 Jun 2010 2:24 PM

Lookin at Lucky and Fly Down look to be the best right now.

ZZM 08 Jun 2010 2:31 PM

Lookin at Lucky, of course! Who else?

My second choice: Dublin! He might still have a lot to prove; but he might just surprise you all!

CURLINLOVER 08 Jun 2010 2:41 PM

Lookin at Lucky and Sydney's Candy are the only 3yo's still running that have two stakes wins, right?  And one of LAL's was a classic, so right now that puts him on top with Sydney second, and First Dude third.  I know First Dude has only a maiden win, but he placed in two legs of the TC AND got a lot of press for attracting the Palins to the Belmont.  (There is no such thing as bad publicity.)

For a late-blooming horse for the second half of the year, I'll take Fly Down.  I think LAL is the most likely champion at this early point in the year, though.

Pam S. 08 Jun 2010 2:57 PM

I want to know the status of Take Control. He could easily be the best colt if he can get healthy and ready for the end of the summer!

what is the word Jason?

Lucy, Trappe Shoot won the 4th race on the Belmont undercard. You can watch the replay at equibase.com. He also was almost a half second faster than D Funnybone, geared down in the last 100 yards...

Of those listed, Lucky is 3YO champ!

Billy's Empire 08 Jun 2010 3:08 PM

I actually was thinking about this last night and wrote a paper of how not only will Lookin At Lucky be 3 year old champion this year, he will also be champion older horse next year and Horse of the Year as a 4 year old(after Zenyatta retires) - I deleted it because it was written at 1AM and I believed it not be my best work, but I'll sum it up here.  To me this horse is the most underappreciated 2 year old champion we have had in decades.  Not only was he a so called sprinter -at times-, the horse went 5 for 6 at 2 losing only the BC Juv. by a head when going wide the whole way and breaking from post 13 at 2 years old!  Then his year isn't over and he races again and wins!  We haven't had a 2/3 year old like this in decades and we should really appreciate him.  In all honesty I don't think any horse or near any horse in history could have done any better than him any of those races he lost given the trouble he ran into.  He should be undefeated and he is IMO one of the few horses that had he not run into such bad luck would be a Triple Crown winner and I don't say that often.  He got shut off twice in the Rebel, and won.  He got pulled up in the SA Derby ran on for third and given his tenacity I would say he probably would have ran down Sidney's Candy with a clear run.  This horse is doing things that no other 2 year old champ since the good old days "70's" could do.  One out of the money finish after smashing into the rail and running very far back, farther than he prefers for 6th.  It was just a matter of time till he got a clear race and he showed us what he has, could, and always does given a fair race - he wins.  God forbid anything unforseen happens, I wouldn't pick any other 3 year old against him, none of them have that special thing that made him the 2 year old champion - that tremendous will to win.  The best 2 year old/spring 3 year old since 1979 - NO DOUBT IN MY MIND and up until his Preakness and analyzing previous years I'd say the closest any horse can come to him (2/3 year old season into TC) is Easy Goer, who IMO wouldn't beat Lookin At Lucky, why?? Lookin At Lucky really really really HATES to lose.  All he has left to do now is sweep the summer 3 year old races - given he has no troubled trips and he is guaranteed of 3 year old honors.  His true test will be in the BCC at Churchill and I only see the big mare winning that one, BUT since I believe in superstition I will bet against her as I did last year when I picked Summer Bird.  I want her to win everything she enters and betting against her for me, in the BCC, will help her accomplish that at least in my head lol.  I'll probably bet on Lookin At Lucky.  As for Lookin At Lucky I don't see him losing to anyone other than her - why??? not a single horse in recent memory loves to fight for the win more than this Lucky boy.

-- On a side note, I am a person who sees speed as a huge asset in racing.  First Dude is a gorgeous horse and if he learns to win - which he had no excuses not to in Belmont given the pace scenario, he will be Lucky's greatest challenge.  Still, if all things stay as they have been, given no unfair trips, I honestly don't think they can beat Lucky.  Watch the Preakness, its not very often you see a horse who passes the field then gets passed by the early pacesetter but battles back to win by 3/4 against horses who had clear shots form all sides.  I'll say it again best 2/spring 3 year old we have had since Spectacular Bid all the way back in 1979.  I really do like First Dude though too and I think wherever Lucky isn't, First Dude will be there to win the race.  The handicap division is horrendous and I'm not a huge believer in Quality Road beyond 9 furlongs - he has yet to win and got two fair chances last year at the distance.  Plus unlike others I don't think his Met Mile was all that impressive, his time given track variance was good, but not SPECTACULAR, had Ghostzapper been in there he wins by 4 going away in 1.32 and change probably eased as he was so many times.  I do like Quality Road though as a sprinter and I'm not trying to belittle him but that extra furlong may be too much too handle as he is 0 for 2 when asked.  The east coast racing establishment always makes me laugh especially given the fact that Mike Wathmaker was crowning him the best horse in the country after let me say it again (an avg. at best) Met Mile win.  Did he forget about Zenyatta?? No, he simply regrets his mistake of saying Rachel was the best horse last year yet stands beside it like he must defend his words by offending Zenyatta when crowning Quality Road.  Point is beyer speed figures are all DRF people care about and horses out east who run big #'s such as Quality Road.  Most have yet to realize winning is what matters not some number given by a person, who is flawed in obvious bias, ala east coast.  Tell me how many times Zenyatta has lost and to whom??  Thank you.  :  )  Now tell me Quality Road's record and who he has beat. Not even in the same area code.  Just incase you all didn't get all that.  Zenyatta is best horse in training and I hope I see her win everything as she has always done.  Lookin at Lucky is best 2/spring 3 year old we have had since The Bid and thats a fact, Easy Goer didn't have the will to win, so don't even argue it.  That horse needed his track to carry around with him otherwise he was done in.  How many times did he win outside New York - not much, if not ever.  Lookin At Lucky is a better horse, at least at this point in comparing careers.  Fact.

Vic S 08 Jun 2010 3:09 PM

It's hard to project a horse like First Dude with only a maiden win at this point in his three year-old season to be the 3 year-old champion.  I think hands down, Looking at Lucky will show that he is clearly the best.  He has tacticle speed, is always game and gives his best and can run on any surface.  Fly Down is another that I think we weill hear from.  As for Paddy O'Prado, this guy looks like he might be the boss three year-old on grass and D'Funnybone's ability to rate behind a fast pace means thatg he might be the best 3 year-old sprinter.  Of the four, LAL should prevail.

LAZMANNICK 08 Jun 2010 3:17 PM

Lookin at Lucky will be your 3 year old champion.  Super Saver peaked at just the right time--and the fact that SS had nothing left for the Preakness tells me his Grade I winning days are over.  He got LUCKY!  Lookin at Lucky beat some fresh horses in the Preakness and considering the sloooooow Belmont time tells me he could have definitely won the Belmont had he run.  Fly Down and Ice Box are all hype--Fly Down peaked in the Belmont Stakes but Drosselmyer was just a little bit better.  Probably the reason why Winstar paid $600,000 for him.

Whatever 08 Jun 2010 3:20 PM

@ Douglas  I was thinking the same thing--sprinters are a forgotten and overlooked group. I think D'Funnybone has tremendous potential and he's off to an excellent start this year. He's a consistent top sprinter in a year of inconsistent classic distance 3-year-olds....

stretchrun 08 Jun 2010 3:22 PM

Super Saver!

Trebloc 08 Jun 2010 3:31 PM

Looking At Lucky, all the way........Looks like the best is coming from the west.........and I live on the east coast..NC

sodapopkid 08 Jun 2010 3:36 PM

Nice statistic about the Preakness winner being 3 year old champ every year since 2001.  He does not like to win by much so it is hard to tell just how good he is, and he certainly has been unlucky both in post draws and position (He was in the waaaay back with Ice Box and Make Music for Me for the Derby!).  "I looked up and said what the hell is he doing on the rail" (Baffert commenting on the Santa Anita Derby). I would like to see a light campaign...perhaps the Swaps, a prep at Oaktree, and onto the Breeders Cup Classic. Of the Triple Crown crew he seems to have had the best form throughout with only 1 off the board performance. Baffert's instructions to Gomez for the Derby (1).  Break well.  (2).  We're screwed.   The top choice right now.

Householder 08 Jun 2010 3:44 PM

I also would like to know what Take Control's status is.  I was high on him before his first race and he should be a much more talented horse than we have seen anywhere else inthe 3 year old realm this year.  

Of the horses mentioned above, I would say that if First Dude or Fly Down comes back and wins a few graded races then they would have a shot, but at this point it would be Lookin at Lucky.  He isn't a standout, but he hasn't been beaten when hes gotten a decent trip.

kibble 08 Jun 2010 3:54 PM

Looking at Lucky.  Though he has lost three times, he never stopped trying in any of them. He had every right to quit running in KY, and he still fought the whole way.  His wins are good as anyone's, and his losses seem the most creditible to me.  Ice Box may have just been spent on Saturday, but it's hard for me to imagine Lucky putting in such a dull effort.

teetop 08 Jun 2010 4:28 PM

I forgot about D'Funnybone and all his graded sprint wins.  He is not without a chance at the 3yo championship (Xtra Heat, a pure sprinter, won the girls' title), but I think it would have to be a year where the "routers" kept taking turns beating each other.

I also think I spelled Sidney wrong in my other post.  

Pam S. 08 Jun 2010 4:42 PM

Don';t forget about Jackson Bend.  Were it not for some unfortunate luck in the Preakness, he would have been the winner.  He can run with ANY 3-year old in the land.

Jim Allen 08 Jun 2010 4:56 PM

Pam S.,

Speling and grammer do not cownt off hear.

Ted from LA 08 Jun 2010 5:04 PM

Although he has somewhat been forgotten, Jackson Bend should win this category.  The fact of the matter is that he runs in almost all Grade 1 stakes races and has only finished out of the money once in his entire career.  Eskendereya took away from this colt because they were constantly being put in the same races, however, without Eskendereya, he would have been the top finisher in multiple other Grade 1 races.  You just have to throw out the derby and realize what great accomplishments this colt has already made, and how many more he will make this summer and throughout the rest of his career.

runfortheroses12 08 Jun 2010 5:16 PM

         LAL seems to be on track for 3yr old champ but, there is alot of good races still ahead!

Fly Down and First Dude , watch out for them especially . Stately Victor needs to go to the turf ! Super Saver is another one to watch also .

Lucy - I watched Trappe Shot win at Belmont . I think he has a future ! He's by Tapit

Pedigree Shelly 08 Jun 2010 5:26 PM

Winslow Homer was an interesting pick.  What would happen if he came back and won the Haskell, Travers and JGC?  Right now I think the sentiment would be woth Lookin at Lucky, but anything can happen in the fall, and maybe Trappe Shot will have a big fall also

Footlick 08 Jun 2010 5:55 PM

runfortheroses12  & Jim Allen,

I agree, I think when Jackson Bend returns from being freshened he will be a big factor in the 9 furlong races this summer.  

CV 08 Jun 2010 6:15 PM

taking nothing away from the 3 horses that won the three legs of the triple crown,personally i don't think the winner has stepped up yet. for example j.jerkens has a killer in afleet express who aired at belmont 3 weeks ago.he looks like he finally got over his gate problems.talent is not a question,now it's gaining experience.look out for him in the haskell or the travers.i sure would not bet against him

tom m

tom m 08 Jun 2010 6:15 PM

Jason you hit the nail on the head Winslow Homer is back and he wins the Haskell and Travers

D-MAC 08 Jun 2010 6:18 PM

Lookin at Lucky in a landslide.

Once this colt gets the lead, he doesn't give it back.

If he has the lead at the 1/4 pole, your not going past him.

Enough said.

Secretariat 08 Jun 2010 6:21 PM

Truth be told, I don't think any of these are quality horses. Eskendereya, had he only remained fit, would have handed these horses their heads. None of them have turned in a performance that would remotely rival the best of the top older horses this year. I would be very surprised if any of these horses, with the possible exception of L@L, were to win the Eclipse. That being said, it's no sure thing that the horses being paraded around underneath these (Afleet Express and Trappe Shot being two leading examples) will take well to distance, or excel in open competition. As it stands, though, both of them ran faster last out than any of the above ever have. I think a judgment can only be made on the horses that have been racing in the big races thus far, of which the best (excluding Esky, obviously) is Lookin at Lucky.

STC 08 Jun 2010 6:28 PM

First Dude...those stretch runs were incredible even if he got caught. I want to see what he does the rest of the yesr. Just wish i had some money on him in the  Preakness!

Nancy 08 Jun 2010 6:38 PM

Lookin at Lucky!! I love this boy. Unless of course "Charley Brown" shows what he's capable of ... then I don't know...

Ida Lee 08 Jun 2010 6:44 PM

Vic S, it is NOT FACT that Lookin at Lucky is the best 2-3 year old since 1979. That is unprovable, so it is incorrect to say it is a fact. Also, have you ever seen Silver Charm? He had just as much heart as LAL and he was faster to boot. Easy Goer did win outside of New York(The Swale Stakes), Sunday Silence  was probably better than LAL, Big Brown was much faster than LAL, and I could give more examples, but all my opinion. Can I prove any of these things or prove that these horses are better than LAL? No I can't. Can you prove that LAL is better than them? No you can't. Opinion is not fact, so please, please don't try to pass it off as fact.

Citation 08 Jun 2010 6:44 PM

Only sure thing:  A sprinter will never win Champ 3 yr old colt/gelding -- I think Looking At Lucky will prevail.

skyfire 08 Jun 2010 7:20 PM

Ever since I watched his maiden win I loved Winslow Homer....if he returns running like he did before his injury repair time, watch out, he should be a powerhouse horse @ 3.

Don

Don from Delaware 08 Jun 2010 8:28 PM

Count me for Lookin At Lucky and I agree First Dude has shown a lot of grit.  

I still like Ice Box, Fly Down, Game On Dude, and Drosselmeyer, if Mike Smith stays on him.

Freetex 08 Jun 2010 8:47 PM

I only hope there is a real 3YO out there.  This group of triple crown winners is embarrassing.  Just look at the times.  $50,000 claimers are running faster!  I am looking for a late bloomer like Trappe Shot.  These other guys are a joke.

classichorse? 08 Jun 2010 8:50 PM

I think it's a little too early to tell. The TC didn't hold too much weight last year, it seemed to be the later races that msde the difference.

I think the Travers and the BC may have the final say this year.

Unless First Dude wins one or both of those he's a longshot at the very best. That may not even do it for HIM. LAL? Winning the Travers would possibly seal it for him, same for SS and maybe a couple others who are coming back for those races.

Tim G 08 Jun 2010 8:59 PM

Looking At Lucky hands down. Jason, looks like Rachel is headed towards the Fleur de Lis. what say you????

Paula Higgins 08 Jun 2010 9:02 PM

I'm going with Looking AT lucky at this point. A horse that has run some gutsy efforts, win or lose. I also like the fact that Bob Baffert also skipped running him in the Belmont. We all know there are plenty of big money races to come in the future.He'll always give 100%.

Alex 08 Jun 2010 9:12 PM

Super Saver!!!  The Kentucky Derby, Jim Dandy and Travers should get the job done.

Ranagulzion 08 Jun 2010 9:30 PM

I'm going to jump back on the Dross wagon but ONLY if they keep Smith on him.  If they go back to Kent D, then I won't.  My other guess will either be Fly Down or LAL.  Both have graded stakes win that were pretty impressive.  Their running style will suit the rest of the 3 yr old races.  I'm looking at Fly Down to actually pass LAL in the end but like you said, we have a long ways to go.  I mentioned before, I wouldn't be surprised if different horses wins the rest of the 3 yr old races which is quite possibly the first time it happens.

jayjay 08 Jun 2010 9:48 PM

I think by the end of the year Lookin At Lucky will be the 3 year old champion.He is still a very young horse[May Foal] so he should mature a lot in the fall.

John T 08 Jun 2010 9:50 PM

How can you talk about last year's three year olds and not mention Mind That Bird. He hit the board in all three triple crown races and had a change in jockeys to boot. Even Rachel didn't take on three triple crown races. And you can see what it does to a horse. You have to give credit to the owners for supporting the sport and agreeing to run Mind That Bird in the Preakness when they didn't want to. And he could have won if Calvin had ridden him. So please a little more respect is due.

And that goes for Super Saver as well. He had the best two year old race or at least one of them and at least one of the best three year old races. And his connections aren't making excuses  unlike some of the others. (you know who I mean.)

Mookie's Hero 08 Jun 2010 10:43 PM

Mookie: Last time I checked MTB still hasnt won a race since the Derby. Been over a year. Who cares how many times he hit the board?

Jason Shandler 08 Jun 2010 10:51 PM

Oh and yeah, I'm not jumping off of IceBox's wagon, he's still a legit threat and will most likely make some noise.  I was just more impressed with Fly Down's Belmont run coming back from 3 weeks off after winning the Dwyer.

I will not get on First Dude's wagon though.  Yes he looks like he's improving but it begs the question how he was not able to finish better than he did at Belmont when going 1:14 and 1:40, Fly Down who was stuck inside of him until Dross made his move and allowed him to move outside was able to catch him.  I guess we'll see how First Dude runs again in a shorter race (than the Belmont) to see if he can then hold off the closers.

jayjay 08 Jun 2010 10:58 PM

"Who cares how many times he hit the board?"

People who bet him to show?

Ted from LA 08 Jun 2010 11:11 PM

Hey! What about the fillies?   If not a filly (I still like Blind Luck and Biofuel and have high hopes for a bunch of others), then I'm hoping for a Tiznow-type bursting out of the clouds in the second half of this year.  Frankly, "Other" seems the best bet right now.  This sure doesn't feel like the Curlin, Street Sense, Hard Spun, Rags etc. year, when the 3YO's kept beating each other but I still thought they were a very good bunch.  

BTW Shandler (I am disagreeing with you mightily and so I won't use your first name) you're starting to sound a little Nay-like about MTB.  Stop it.  Bad enough you have a blind spot about the sport-which-shall-not-be-named.

mz 09 Jun 2010 12:51 AM

If hitting the board isn't important for Mine That Bird why do we here so much about First Dude, the trainer who had three different horses hit the board, the jockey who hit the board twice etc. Such a big deal this year that NONE of the horse even ran in all three races. Mine That Bird ran in all three and came First, Second and Third. That is as good as Curlin's Third, First and Second. Yes he faded after that but so did just about every three year old colt who ran in all three triple crown races. Please note Bob Bafferts comments about wanting to keep Looking at Lucky around for the rest of the year which meant shipping the Belmont. My point exactly. Yes more respect is due this horse

Mookie's Hero 09 Jun 2010 1:29 AM

As it looks right now I would say LAL but since Draynay has picked him he is just plain doomed to the Dray curse. I think this is just an average bunch of 3yold's.  Even though I don't like the connections I think that more consideration should go to Dfunnybone, especially if the rest keep beating up on eachother.  MTB was an okay horse that benefited from CB at CHD's nothing else. If he's better than that lets see him prove it this year.

Rowner 09 Jun 2010 6:13 AM

MTB is to little to win against some of these horses.

Gosh, he looks like a pony up against some of these bigger horses.

I'll give him  a pass, due to his size.

sodapopkid 09 Jun 2010 7:37 AM

On June 22, 1960, a couple of weeks after the Belmont Stakes was run, a smallish dark bay 3 yr old gelding made his first start of the year in an 6F allowance race at Monmouth. He cruised to a 10 length victory in 1:10 flat. He went on to win his next 7 of 8 races, finishing the year with 6 straight G-1 wins. He was not only named 3 Year Old Champ, but HOTY too. The first of five straight HOTY titles. The one and only.... Kelso.

So maybe we haven't seen the best 3 yr old that is still in training this year.

We already saw the best 3 yr old of this year. The more I watch this crop of sophomores, (2:31.57 Belmont?), the more I'm convinced Eskendereya would have had a cake walk to the Crown. Too bad.  

Saratoga AJ 09 Jun 2010 9:33 AM

Arem 08 Jun 2010 2:11 PM "Call it sentiment if you wish, but don't count Lentenor out just yet."

I can't help but laugh at the delusion.  Seriously, how can you compare Lentenor to LAL?  If LAL stays together, I think he will repeat last year.  LAL has consistently displayed every quality required of a champion and is the only one who has.  

AngelaFromAbilene 09 Jun 2010 9:42 AM

Lucky! The only guy at the top right now--Don't sell Sidney's Candy short, I think it's clear now the :46 half of the Derby did him in--Super Saver is right there, as well--as far as Vic S saying Easy Goer didn't have the will to win, are you kidding me?

Matthew W 09 Jun 2010 9:46 AM

ESKENDEREYA

howard b 09 Jun 2010 9:48 AM

You are right, you can't call them mediocre yet... you can call them below mediocre! If there is no late bloomer who can actually run close to fast, Eskendereya would get my vote.

Ghostzapper 09 Jun 2010 10:07 AM

"Only sure thing:  A sprinter will never win Champ 3 yr old colt/gelding "

Um, gee...if Lost in the Fog hadn't been suffering from the cancer which ended his life so tragically I think he'd have proven you wrong.

CajunCountry 09 Jun 2010 10:10 AM

What's with everyone referring to Jason as "Shandler?"  While I am sure we all agree he may have a personality disorder, he's hardly Newman.  Please show him more respect.

Ted from LA 09 Jun 2010 10:22 AM

I think Fly Down will emerge as a star he is getting better and still ran a heck of race at belmont. Dont sleep on first dude he is still young once he figures out his game cut back the distance he is going to be hard to beat. Havent seen a front end horse like him in awhile and brings a different type of game to horse racing. If you try an run with him you will run into the ground ask interatifs trainers and super savers how that worked out trying to run with first dude.

It aint easy being the truth! 09 Jun 2010 10:43 AM

@Vic S: Maybe you should have gone with the 1:00 AM post, it couldn't have sounded any more foolish. Can you save the Z babble for another day?  I think LAL is the best on this list, but last year tells me there's a long way to go.  I like Winslow Homer a lot.  We shall see how sound he is.    

GreyK 09 Jun 2010 10:54 AM

Who?  One of my two favorites.

Who?  First Dude or Jackson Bend.

First choice:  First Dude (voted)

Second choice:  Jackson Bend

Love Those Dudes 09 Jun 2010 11:00 AM

Lookin at Lucky has proven to be by far the best so far, in my opinion. I think he'll continue to only get better. Also of note, all three triple crown race winners trace back in male line the the one and only NATIVE DANCER!  WOW what a horse!

Racingfan 09 Jun 2010 11:08 AM

To me, LAL and First Dude have all the class and stamina to be top 3 year old.  However, at the start of the year, what I saw from Take Control was pure magic.  Azeri & AP Indy...CLASS.  Hope he's back soon.  (Still hoping Stately vic gets in gear soon-I really like him)

Slew 09 Jun 2010 11:10 AM

jason

do you have any info on the godolphin runner girolamo??

mike rullo 09 Jun 2010 11:24 AM

I have to agree with many most of the 3yrs old are not that great this year, or they are all the same no one really stood out to me this year other then Eskendereya. Had raced in the derby and lost I think he would have come back and won every race afterward. This was the 1st year after the Derby I just was watching I really didn't have any favorites any of the races. LAL seems to be the most talented of the horses for now. We will have to see who moves forward and grows more as the year moves to Haskell, Travers and the BC.

carla 09 Jun 2010 11:35 AM

Citation, you seem to not be reading my statements incorrectly.  I specifically had an inconclusion for those who read my article at the bottom to sum it up Lookin at Lucky is the best 2/spring 3 year old since 79' and that is a fact.  Easy Goer, IMO was overhyped, people to this day are like southern Civil War veterans and can't seem to acknowledge the fact that there side (horse) wasn't all that he was made out to be.  Easy Goer was one run animal who raced primarily in New York and did need his track, he couldn't handle Churchill and with one win outside of New York being beaten by a truly good horse Sunday Silence all times he tried him out of his home state can't be overlooked.  Lookin at Lucky is the best 2/spring 3 year old we have had since 79'.  He actually does have sprinters speed if you watch his races, they chose not to use it.  Although they did in the Preakness and they put him upper mid-pack on the Preakness backstretch, believe me this horse has sprinters speed if need be.  Silver Charm was not near the 2 year old that Lookin At Lucky was, neither was Big Brown (one start).  It is a fact that Lookin at Lucky is superior to the prior mentioned AT THIS POINT IN THEIR CAREERS, which I made sure I said in the original article.   That is why I said spring 3 year old.  Lucky, was asked many things, and like I said in the other article ONLY Easy Goer is as comparative when using 2/3 year old seasons since 89'.  Problem is other than the Triple Crown races, Easy Goer beat weaker foes, had easier races, and ran primarily in New York.  Remember his mile in 1.32 and change equalling Dr. Fager's world record - people had him locked up at 2 and this only sealed the deal for him at 3 to be a supposed Super Horse.  Just look at the conditions of how the Doc won his mile and then look at Easy Goer's and you'll see had he had equivalent weight and the tigher turn track at Arlington he runs that mile in 1.34 and 4 AT BEST.  The horse was overhyped and it was proved throught the Triple Crown and in the Breeders' Cup.  Yes Easy Goer was a great horse but if he doesn't have the kahones to beat Sunday Silence eye to eye in the Preakness, how in the hell is he going to hold off horses coming from all sides in the Preakness. Won't happen.  Lookin At Lucky is a better horse, no doubt - at this point in their careers. FACT.

Vic S 09 Jun 2010 11:46 AM

"Mookie: Last time I checked MTB still hasnt won a race since the Derby. Been over a year. Who cares how many times he hit the board?

jshandler 08 Jun 2010 10:51 PM"

The connections who put around 2 million dollars in their pockets?

mz, he's on again off again. LOL

Sometimes he feels like a nut, sometimes he doesn't.

Tim G 09 Jun 2010 11:47 AM

The consensus sure seems to be for Looking at Lucky! Who am I to argue. Baffert is one of the best trainers in the game and the horse has proven himself. Plus his Daddy also gave us Curlin, who was no slouch.  However as one blogger pointed out, the BC Classic is at Churchill Downs this year, a track that Super Saver just loves. I could easily see (especially if the track comes up wet) Super Saver taking the Classic and then there is no way a Derby/BC Classic winner would be denied the 3 year old championship.

OLD TIMER 09 Jun 2010 12:23 PM

Out Of the horses who ran in the TC series, I think LaL,First Dude,Fly Down,& Ice Box will duke-it-out to determine who'll be 3yo Champ.

LaL-- has proven to be classy & consistent.

First Dude-- The Dude is gutsy & tough.Should only get better,but too bad he lacks that quick acceleration to go w/his giant stride & frame.

Fly Down-- Also should improve even more.Consistent & wants to win.Toss his La.Derby farce.

Ice Box-- He's for real,no doubt.He flipped his palate in the Belmont so he had a legitimate excuse.Plus,he won't get that slow of a pace ever again.

The injured Take Control & Odysseus should make their presence felt IF they comeback 100% healthy.

Carlos in Cali 09 Jun 2010 12:35 PM

None of the above will be 3 y o champion.

Workforce will ship for the BC Classic, and hand Zenyatta her first --and only--defeat, leaving all other 3 y os in his wake.  Don't believe me?  Look at the Derby video.  Nothing here has looked this impressive while shaving 0.98 seconds from a stakes record.

Qatmom 09 Jun 2010 12:42 PM

LaL....The class of The Lot...This summer meet will be worth watching, just to see who comes out on top going into The BCC...Quality Road or Rachel again will be HOY!!!...Sorry Zen...Run on DIRT and against Real competition and Win and THEN and ONLY then will she Truly Be The Queen!!!!

The Bid 09 Jun 2010 1:00 PM

why did you forget about take control? the colt by ap indy out of azeri who broke his maiden in like a barbaro fashion where he was very very very green but won nonetheless simply because he was far and away the better horse in his maiden race at 2. he should be coming back to working from bucked shins

anna 09 Jun 2010 1:35 PM

The Bid, You dont have to worry about Rachel being a HOTY in 2010.  That joke is over. IF you think not, you are drinking to much of JessJackson's Excuse Juice.

sodapopkid 09 Jun 2010 1:40 PM

IT. IS. NOT. A FACT.  Did you even read the rest of my post? I don't care how much you love LAL, it is NOT a fact that he is better than any of the horses I mentioned. His times aren't as good, his Beyers aren't as good, he hasn't beaten better horses that most of them, he hasn't won multiple classics like Silver Charm  or Big Brown, by every single objective measure of horse talent he is not that great, except maybe winning percentage, and plenty have him beat there as well. I cannot believe that you insist on stating that it is a "fact" that he is the best 2/Spring 3-year old there has been since 1979. Has LAL had a Sunday Silence to face? No. So how can you imply that he would be able to beat him? In the BCJ, LAL got outkicked by Vale of York. I know it wasn't a dream trip, but if he was anywhere near as good as you say he is, shouldn't he have fought Vale of York off? But he didn't. In the Santa Anita Derby, I know he had to check at the top of the lane and still he finished third. But you said that no horse could have done better than he in that situation, which fails to take into account Assault, the Hall of Famer who had to take back to last THREE TIMES in the same race, which had two other hall of famers in it, and he still won., plus plenty of other horses. Please don't be so horribly disrespectful to other horses and other people's arguments. Do not call smething which is not a fact a fact.  

Citation 09 Jun 2010 2:35 PM

Face the facts. There is no point for Zenyatta to face RA this year anymore since RA has been whipped twice already and rendered herself a mute point at this time. HOY for Zenyatta follows directly down the dirt road against older males. That is the path she should be taking. Zenyattas connections are smart enough to know they don't have to beat a horse that their second stringer already beat for Zenyatta to get HOY.

gw_bushwacker 09 Jun 2010 2:38 PM

I'm really at a loss with the decision to run RA in the Fleur de Lys against two other horses.  Why?  Just retire her so she can live her life safe and sound.  Don't risk her for this nonsense.  Same with Zenyatta.  Retire her safe and sound rather than run in the Vanity against a short field.

So frustrated.

2:24 09 Jun 2010 3:02 PM

Trappe Shot will be the 3 year old champ whether he can route or not.  He is by far the most talented REMAINING 3 year old and if he can stay healthy he will prove it.  If not, Lookin at Lucky gets it.  Simple.

ryanmoseley 09 Jun 2010 3:08 PM

Vic S, I know you like LAL. But I don't want to hear opinions being called facts, okay? If you choose to comply, thank you.

Citation 09 Jun 2010 3:22 PM

@ Citation

Fine than I will say this, it is my opinion based on facts of past racing performances that Lookin at Lucky is best 2/sring 3 year old we have seen since 79'.  My opinion, is that good.

Vic S 09 Jun 2010 4:24 PM

Just a general question: is Zenyatta still a 3YO?  If not, why is everyone bringing her up on the "3YO Champion" blog?

mz 09 Jun 2010 4:37 PM

Vic S, yes, that's good. Just as it is my opinion based on the facts of past racing performances that LAL is not the best. We can just agree that we are interpreting the facts in different ways and move on.

Citation 09 Jun 2010 5:01 PM

Did someone say supersaver will win the breeders cup! loL! Thats funny who is going to be riding him? Looking at lucky and first dude are good but I highly doubt they can hang with RA, Zenyatta and Quality Road!

It aint easy being the truth! 09 Jun 2010 6:33 PM

Lookin at Lucky, Super Saver, First Dude, Fly Down, and Ice Box are in the best position to win the Eclipse because they have already accomplished a fair amount.  I rank Lucky #1 because he won a classic, also won the gr.2 Rebel, had valid excuses in his 2 defeats, and though last year doesn't matter(and should not be considered a factor in the Eclipse for this year) in terms of ranking the horses I have to recognize that Lucky was our champion 2 year old.

Super Saver is a tough horse to gauge, but I don't think his Derby was a total fluke.  I just think he's inconsistent and might not be able to handle a rigorous campaign.

First Dude has talent and speed, so he will be a very dangerous horse.  However, he hasn't won a graded stakes yet. (Have to disagree Jason about him being the best horse in the Belmont; a 1:40 mile is not exactly taking the heat).

If any of the also-rans performed better than Drosselmeyer in the Belmont, I say it was Fly Down.  I like him and his tactical speed a little more than Ice Box.

GunBow 09 Jun 2010 6:55 PM

Jason, (I won't be so disrespectful as to call you just Shandler)  You should be ashamed making disparaging remarks about Mine That Bird.  There are quite a few fans out there who love the little guy and will show up to see him and bet on him.  To crow over horses like First Dude or Fly Down who "hit the board" in one or two triple crown races but then cut MTB for his accomplishment during the TC season last year (which was as good as Curlins TC races) is completely inconsistent and shows a real nasty prejudice against a nice gelding who, if he'd brought you the money and spectacular TC ride that he did for his connections, I doubt you would've run him down then.  Really, a little respect and consistency please.

TerriV 09 Jun 2010 7:18 PM

I really like LAL and think he probably win 3 year old eclipse(if he wins a few more good ones.)  But lets get one thing straight.  Big Brown would have smashed LAL...  By the way Drosselmeyer's bottom pedigree is just rediculous.  La trionne with the Admiral everywhere plus blur larkspur!  and many more... This horse can run forever.  If anyone is interested read the Article on here about his ped!  Havent seen one like that in a while(although IB and SS are very nice too.  Big Browns ped is very underated but it is pure genious.  Summer Bird also has a royal "Classic" ped.  He will do very well as a sire.

PMAC14 09 Jun 2010 7:36 PM

I don't understand how knowbody is backing Ice Box anymore. This horse couldn't have been in a worse situation with the heat, and pace of the race. Nick Zito was considering scratching him! Trust me you put a line through the belmont! This horse has by far the most explosive turn of foot of any horse in this crop. After the Belmont they interviewed Nick Zito and even though Fly Down ran a great race, all he wanted to talk about was how dissapointed he was in Ice Box. That tells me that Nick knows what he has. And what he has is a soon to be superstar. Ice Box will never get that slow of a pace again. The Belmont made no sense for him and he shouldn;t have been in the race! They will get him straighted out and he is going to win the Haskell and the Travers en route to becoming the 3 year old champion! Watch!

Ice Box 09 Jun 2010 8:15 PM

My vote went to Lookin At Lucky but I know enough to realize that the year is far from over. It's a little early to declare year-end Champions but it's fun to push the vote button. lol!

Zookeeper 09 Jun 2010 9:26 PM

        Racingfan  - You must have been reading my mind ! I was also going to comment that all three horses who won the TC races this year trace back to Raise A Native by ( Native Dancer ) Super Saver traces to him through Majestic Prince . LAL and Drosselmeyer trace back to Raise A Native through Mr. Prospector.

Pedigree Shelly 09 Jun 2010 9:33 PM

sounds good Citation

Vic S 09 Jun 2010 9:47 PM

Hi Spunky!

Don't act like you don't care Jason. I miss you and Tommy,so why have you ignored me since our little get togethers at last years Breeders Cup events? I sooo miss your FA-BU-Liss foot massages and back rubs,not to mention the awesome Cosmos you whip up,mmmmmm,so DEE-Lish!

Don't be a stranger,CHOW!

  xoxoxo   Strike a pose.You go boy!

RuPaul 09 Jun 2010 10:49 PM

EASY GOER would have ate this crop of 3yo's alive. And so would Sunday Silence have as well. Easy Goer ran the record three year old mile of all time in 1:32.2, second fastest Belmont Stakes of all time. Ran many of the most historic races near track record performances in the Travers, Whitney,Belmont, Suburban, Champagne, Gotham, and even a 6.5f race as a two year old. Blame his connections for running him mostly in NY for his career in the most prestigious, historic, championship races. EG did not lose by a nose in Maryland in 1:53.4 and a neck in Florida because of what state they were in. My opinion, they were two very bad rides, but Sunday Silence was great, Easy Goer was great, no matter my opinion. .....

P.S. If Only Eskenderaya didnt get hurt!

ThoroGreats 09 Jun 2010 11:40 PM

Easy Goer would be stuck at Lucky's neck like so many before and so many still to come that try to pass this horse.  Lucky always finds a way to win once he gets the lead down the lane.

Vic S 10 Jun 2010 2:20 AM

Anna:  Take Control broke his maiden in his debut race this year.  He is 3, not 2.  That is the only race he has been in.

Slew 10 Jun 2010 7:29 AM

Lookin At Lucky won the most in racing. He did that because he's good. Needless to say even with bad trips he hung in their and didn't lose his confidence.

Fran Loszynski 10 Jun 2010 8:30 AM

BOTH Easy Goer and Sunday Silence would have devoured this crop of three year olds, or any crop of three year old since Spectacular Bid. Easy Goer, SS, Cigar, Ghostzapper are the best horses since Bid in 1979-80.

ThoroGreats 10 Jun 2010 11:08 AM

Gun Bow, very good summation. That post of 6:55 last night is spot on IMO.

The Belmont was pretty soft this year and the time was horrible.

OLD TIMER 10 Jun 2010 12:07 PM

I am in strong opinion that Sunday Silence and Easy Goer would not devour any colt in this crop.  Lookin at Lucky stands in their way up to this point - lets see how the rest of the year pans out.

Vic S 10 Jun 2010 12:31 PM

Lookin at Lucky has wins over 4 of the 5 tracks that he has been over.  Any horse that can break his maiden and come back to win a graded stakes the next time out can not be ignored.  He also has wins from 6 furlongs all they way to the Preakness.  Take a look at that Belmont group.  1/3 only had 1 win and 3 of the 4 just a maiden score.  Make Music for Me scored on the 5-6 try in the Pasadena Stakes on grass.  He also has the same connections as Real Quiet which would have won the Triple Crown if the Belmont were 1 1/2 and eleven inches.  He bobbed right back on Victory Gallop.  If he stays sound he will be good for some time.  

Householder 10 Jun 2010 2:21 PM

slew take control debuted on 12/30/09 ten went on the shelf after 1/17/10 due to bucked shins and he's the stablemate to lookin at lucky. baffert gave him 90 days off after take control bucked his shins

anna 10 Jun 2010 4:33 PM

Indeed, we will ALL be waiting for any horse in this crop, including LAL, to run the fastest three year old mile of all time in 1:32.2, second fastest Belmont Stakes of all time, then go on to a historic campaign, Belmont, Whitney, Travers, Woodward, Jockey Club Gold Cup, run near track record performances in historic, prestigious races such as the Whitney, Travers, Belmont, Suburban, Champagne, Gotham, 6.5f as a two year old. Run 7 or 8 120+ or higher beyers, and be a great Hall of Fame champion. I think we may all be waiting for that from this crop, or any crop.

ThoroGreats 10 Jun 2010 8:22 PM

My choice would be Lookin at Lucky, who I liked well before the Breeders' Cup last year. But I have to think that this year's crop of 3-year-olds is somewhat below those in other years. Their Beyers have been really low, and there just doesn't seem to be a dominant horse. It seems like any of the horses could win on any day.

Terri 10 Jun 2010 11:59 PM

My favorite horse is First Dude...as soon as his trainers/owners figure out how to run him...I believe that he willwin most of his races..he is just learning to run, like Curlin, a slow starter, long strider..yes, some of the horses are have quicker turnover afoot than  First Dude, but none have shown more Heart...If First Dude had been let go from the gate at Belmont, he would have desimated the field..

Rando 11 Jun 2010 8:53 AM

Anna..sorry-you are correct.  I worry that now it has been 5 months, and I still hear no word of Take Control being back in training.

Slew 11 Jun 2010 10:31 AM

slew well baffert said that he was going to gear him towards a summer campian. and with his pedigree since azeri wasn't great till 4 so i don't think he'd really run in graded stakes till next yr. but i could be wrong but i don't think his owner wants to push him after he had lost clutch player earlier this yr from the colt getting sick and dying shortly after breaking his maiden a couple weeks after take control broke his maiden.

anna 11 Jun 2010 3:59 PM

Sure can Rock. Email me and we can go from there. jshandler@bloodhorse.com

Jason Shandler 11 Jun 2010 4:39 PM

Lookin At Lucky is better than Easy Goer? Wth were you drinking?  Easy Goer is the second best 3 year old since 1979 and the best was Sunday Silence!  I feel that if Easy Goer was given a better, more favorable racing schedule, he would have gone down as a top 10 great.  But he lost 3 of 4 to SS and that is a fact.  

Look at Easy Goer's impact on racing.  His losses to SS and the scheduling and/or distances of the Gotham, Wood, JCGC, Woodward, and Whitney

were all changed because the NYRA realized that their horses would always be at a disadvantage to colts of similiar ability in Triple Crown as well as BC races after Easy Goer's 1989 campaign.  

So please do not EVER compare Lookin At Lucky or any of these modern slow/soft horses to Easy Goer!  That is blasphemy.  Easy Goer's record, times, and competition are unmatched!  You can even argue his 3 year old campaign was more impressive than Sunday Silence, given his more taxing schedule.  The only 3 year old I have seen of favorable ability to Easy Goer/Sunday Silence was Point Given.  No one else was even close.

klc1975 12 Jun 2010 1:16 PM

so klc your saying that discreet cat who equalled easy goer's mile record at aqueduct doesn't compare to him? or bernardini? the first horse to win the preakness, travers and jockey club gold cup since damacus in 1967?

anna 12 Jun 2010 4:38 PM

What's with the Easy Goer bashing? The horse simply had a presence-a mile under 33 in March? How is that not great? I recall that another horse with that presence-Secretariat-lost races ( and don't start harping on me I am not comparing Big Red to anyone)

Thank you-Thorogreats, klc1975 and anna for coming to his defence before I did!

downhomesunset 12 Jun 2010 5:45 PM

Winslow Homer or Fly Down. These are 2 very talented colts that haven't had the chance to show their best yet, especially Winslow. He was my Derby pick before the injury (and before Esky hit the gas). Lezcano had Fly Down down to a 'T', but was committed to Ice Box in the Belmont. 1 1/2 miles and he was just starting to kick good at the end. He needed an earlier move like Lezcano had done in previous races.

Seriously though Jason. Winslow is the bomb. Any word on how he's doing after the injury? Does it look like 100% recovery? If he's fully recovered, without Eskendereya in the picture, he could take it all in the 3 year old division.

LH1216 13 Jun 2010 8:49 PM

My wish list for best three year old would be: Lookin at Lucky if he maintains his form the rest of the year, Super Saver if he can pull himself together, Ice Box who recently posted a couple of good Beyers  and Winslow Homer, because I liked him early on before his injury.

Nancy 13 Jun 2010 10:36 PM

@klc, I said UP TO THIS POINT IMO that LaL is superior to Easy Goer.  LaL should be undefeated given his horrendous trips.  Just as many fans of Easy Goer always point the finger at Pat Day who in turn didn't really ride a bad race on the horse.  He wasn't winning the Derby, he lost fair and square and pulling his nose to Sunday Silence wasn't going to change the outcome in the Preakness, Pat Day himself would consistently say SS was as game as they come, and in the BCC Sunday Silence out kicked him in the turn which in turn is horseracing because EG was being asked but simply couldn't stay with his quicker rival.  As for comparisons with LaL, I don't think LaL with a fair TRIP would let another horse beat him as we have seen time and again.  Easy Goer wasn't running into horses heels and being put into the rail in all but 1 race at 3 was he??? Didn't think so, and if so given Easy Goer's lackasdasical turn of foot he couldn't have won the Rebel given LaL's trip because LaL does have sprinter's speed if need be.  I also believe LaL to be as game as any horse of recent years (70's) and wouldn't bet against him even if Easy Goer was in the field of 2/spring 3 year olds.  This all being said, I recently talked to someone about Winstar farm - and their connections, and it was delightful conversation so I will be pulling for them this year and years to come - goodluck to Winstar and goodluck to all.

Vic S 14 Jun 2010 12:04 AM

Easy Goer would inhale anybody in this crop, including LAL! Easy Goer ran the fastest three year old mile of all time, second fastest Belmont Stakes of all time. Ran many of the most prestigious races in near track record times in the Whitney at 9F, Travers at 10F, Suburban at 10F giving 12-18 pounds away, Belmont, Gotham, Champagne at a mile as a two year old, even at 6.5F as a two year old as well. Ran 7 or 8 120+ or higher beyers in his career,more than any other horse since Bid, 4 more than Ghostzapper,Skip Away,etc or anybody else. Went on to a historic campaign, and even Pat Day has admitted his riding was terrible. Is in the Hall of Fame as well. Easy Goer or Sunday Silence would have inhaled any crop, including this one, since Bid. Any crop.

ThoroGreats 14 Jun 2010 4:16 AM

Mr. Paul Moran of espn stated it so correctly and true: "Easy Goer was the better and more spectacularly talented horse, but was defeated by a nose and neck because Pat Day rode him like the exposed end of a live wire."

 that is a great way of putting it.....Easy Goer won the Belmont in 2:26, second fastest only to Secretariat....He had to make up several lengths twice in BCC because for some reason Pat Day didn't move with SS @ 3/4 pole. Heturned on another gear and lost by a diminishing neck. How could anyone say that EG didnt have turn of foot!

LAL will never carry as much as he did or race as far as he did. He missed his chance to prove himself @ 1 1/2 miles in a grade 1 because the Belmont Stakes is the only dirt race of that distance-so we will never know if he can carry his speed over that distance, period.

I believe Drosselmeyer will prove to be the most consistent in this crop of 3 year olds, unless someone else comes out of the woodwork and beats them all-no one is a major stand out at this point.

downhomesunset 14 Jun 2010 12:39 PM

downhomesunset

Correction: AP Indy/Easy Goer share the 2nd fastest Belmont victory.

BTW-- AP Indy and Bernardini would've smoked Easy Goer or any other 3yo since the Bid,IMO.

Carlos in Cali 14 Jun 2010 6:43 PM

LOL!! Easy Goer ran his Belmont in 2:26.01 and AP Indy ran his Belmont in 2:26.15, so Easy Goer still ran the 2nd Fastest Belmont of all time. Record three year old mile of all time in 1:32.2, a tick off Dr Fagers world record mile. Ran on or near track record performances in the most prestigious, historic races in the Whitney at 9f, Travers at 10F, Belmont at 12F, Gotham at 8F, Champagne at 8F, Suburban at 10F, and even at 6.5F as a 2yo! Ran 7 or 8 120+ or higher Beyers in His Career, Double the amount that Ghostzapper, Skip Away, Cigar,Holy Bull had. A.P. Indy an Bernardini had ZERO. Not to mention, Easy Goer had a historic Hall of Fame campaign, after running in ALL 3 legs of the Triple Crown, Belmont, Whitney, Travers, Woodward and Jockey Club Gold Cup. EG and SS would have devoured any crop of 3 yos since Bid in 1980.

ThoroGreats 14 Jun 2010 11:24 PM

Householder: REAL QUIET was a beaten horse in the Belmont. The outcome should have never been close. Kent Desormeaux knew VICTORY GALLOP was about to overtake him, so he did the only thing he could to stop him: strides from the wire he moved RQ into VG's path, causing Gary Stevens to take up. The stewards later agreed, that RQ's number would have been taken down.  

In perhaps the greatest finish in Triple Crown history, the best horse won. Gary Stevens called it his greatest ride.

Alex PB 15 Jun 2010 2:57 PM

the gratest triple races was in 1978 affirmed and alydar,the first and only time the same 2 horses finished first and second ia all three races. the belmont was the most thrilling of all time.i was there, read my story in blood horse magazine april 25- 2009 pg 1500  

william {latee} braud 27 Oct 2010 2:09 PM


Resources