BloodHorse.com

Search Blood-Horse.com

More Hero; Less Goat - By Cot Campbell

The 2009 edition of the Triple Crown has been one of the most fascinating of recent times, although—with numerous high-profile scratches from the Kentucky Derby Presented by Yum! Brands (gr. I)—it did not start out to offer any special cachet. Calvin Borel emerged as the poster boy for the wonderful triad of races. After the Belmont Stakes (gr. I), however, I fear he is in some danger of being the goat, and I don’t want him to be.

Calvin Borel has long been one of America’s most underrated jockeys and one of our most endearing personalities. How could you not like Calvin, with that back-country smile, his heart-warming emotional outbursts, and such an obvious love of the animals he rides? He was the perfect pilot for the plain little gelding from New Mexico and his black-clad cowboy connections. Calvin just about literally rode the hair off Mine That Bird in the Derby, and it was thrilling. Great story.  

Then Calvin jumped ship in a most honorable, up-front manner and won the BlackBerry Preakness (gr. I) with the beloved filly Rachel Alexandra. This was 11 days after she was bought and then supplemented to the race by Jess Jackson (and partner Harold McCormick), a man who is as “game as Dick Tracy.” Rachel wisely passed the Belmont, and Calvin was reunited with Mine That Bird, thanks to the incredibly long-suffering patience of that gelding’s connections.

Then the mistakes came. Calvin made the most ghastly blunder one can make in the sport of horse racing—or in any other field, for that matter. He guaranteed a victory. What an absolutely insane thing to do! First mistake.\

Second mistake: Calvin spent the week before the Belmont becoming the media darling of the sports world. Wonderful for horse racing, but this media blitz should have made room for some familiarizing rides on the mile and a half, big sandy track of Belmont Park, a tricky venue with which the Midwest-based Calvin is not on intimate terms. He did not ride any horse anywhere that week, instead trekking from studio to studio and enjoying the sights of Gotham. Not only that, but his agent did not line up a single mount in another dirt race for him on Belmont day itself. From a practical standpoint this was not smart, nor did it look good cosmetically. Calvin said he did not need that preparation, but still it did not look good.

Third and worst mistake was made at the three-eighths pole in the Belmont Stakes, when this fine jockey pushed the button. He asked Mine That Bird the big question, and he got the answer. The feisty little gelding went into overdrive, hit the front at the eighth pole, but began to struggle when he had gone a mile and seven-sixteenths. Calvin Borel—noted for his extraordinary patience and coolness in big races—uncharacteristically opted for an overland route and surely moved prematurely on a tricky racetrack with which he was not terribly familiar. He blew the Belmont, I believe.

I think this:  If Calvin Borel, instead of Mike Smith, had ridden Mine That Bird in the Preakness, and if Mike Smith, instead of Calvin Borel, had ridden Mine that Bird in the Belmont, we would be celebrating the first Triple Crown winner in 31 years.

Calvin’s post-race comments were as good as he could muster. But the award for grace and class under pressure should go to Chip Woolley, Mine That Bird’s heretofore unheralded trainer. He showed enormous poise, patience, and character during the entire Triple Crown venture and deserves the respect and admiration he is now receiving. Except for one little glitch prior to the Preakness, so do his two owners—Mark Allen and Dr. Leonard Blach—good old boys from New Mexico.

Calvin Borel was about to earn his way into racing’s Hall of Fame, but the Belmont may have slowed that movement down. I hope it will not derail his ultimate admission to the hallowed hall. It should not. He is a fine human being, a credit to racing, and a hell of a jockey. The Belmont experience simply did not find Calvin at his best. His horse’s trainer and owners have seemingly excused this aberration from excellence. So should we all. In the meantime, racing needs more Calvin Borels and more hard-knocking geldings like Mine That Bird.

Cot Campbell is the president of Dogwood Stable, a racing partnership based in Aiken. S.C.

63 Comments:

I agree most heartedly.  Calvin just sort of "lost it", with all the star treatment he received.  Yes, he and perhaps his agent made some poor decisions, but, he is stll Calvin BoRail.  A jockey who is a one-of-a-kind.

Freetex 16 Jun 2009 4:17 PM

Calvin did not make on Mine that bird.Just came up empty in stretch.Cant blame the jockey.  A jockey can only put horse in position to win which he did. HE CANT HELP IT IF COME HOME WAS @* SECONDS FOR TWO FURLONGS

steve s 16 Jun 2009 4:58 PM

Calvin Borel also guaranteed a victory by Rachel Alexandra prior to the Preakness.  Her victory notwithstanding, it was a cocky statement not befitting him.  His guarantee of a victory by Mine That Bird in the Belmont was actually his second mistake.  

Go For Wand 16 Jun 2009 6:43 PM

Absolutely right that racing needs more Calvin Borels!  What fascinated me in his Leno interview were his manners - everything was "yes,sir" or "no sir", and he seemed genuinely humble.  As you said Cot, he's just a guy who honestly loves the animals he's riding, and has since he was a child.  He truly enjoys his career - can many of us say the same?

I don't blame him for guaranteeing a win - heck, I was doing the same thing for MTB from Preakness day right up to the middle of the Belmont!  Yes, I agree that Calvin should have *at least* taken a walk around the track that day, seeing as he'd never ridden there before.  But as for not taking another ride - with the pressure he was under, again, I don't really blame him for not taking another race.  He wanted to be focused on Mine That Bird.

Disappointed at MTB's ride? Sure I am. And slightly disappointed in Calvin,too.  But he will always be probably my most favorite jockey after this Triple Crown season.  I hope that there'll be more jockeys like him someday - just a person that loves the horse more than anything else.

INNIE 16 Jun 2009 6:54 PM

I really like Calvin Borel. His ride in the Derby and his jubilation after winning the race are my favorite moments of this Triple Crown season. He is not perfect but he sure is a breath of fresh air and a very gutsy jockey to boot.

P.S. Love your books!

Zookeeper 16 Jun 2009 9:31 PM

He went Hollywood. Happens to the best. He is a jockey with a great heart and immense talent.

nina 16 Jun 2009 9:32 PM

We all saw the move, Cot. We ALL saw Mr Borel pull the trigger, and we all knew it was too soon. We had seen The Bird make his patented move in the Derby (MUCH to everyone's surprise.....including the announcer); he made it again in the Preakness and was closing fast at the finish line;  when Borel asked for his move in the Belmont he ran out of gas before he ran out of track. An accumulation of issues? I think so: you have gone over them for us, and they all added up a BIG miss in the Belmont. All that said, the rider of Summer Bird "eased" his potential TC winner last year, but we won't go there, will we?? While everyone spent a month being REALLY PO'd at Desormeaux last year, this year he's a hero. So I really wouldn't worry too much about Borel's eventual induction into the Hall of Fame. When Rachel won the Preakness, all hope for the equine TC evaporated for Borel, but he's still one hell of a good jockey, with good instincts, great hands, and patience to die for. This guy will be riding winners for a looooooong time, and I'm going to love every minute of it. He really is a unique character, liked by almost everyone and for good reasons. I know what you're saying about him possibly being the "goat" this year, but this TC season has been so exciting, unique, splendid, quirky, weird, memorable and terrific fun, I think he'll be forgiven quite easily.

Parenthetically, to steve s, actually there ARE times you can blame the jockey, and this was one of those times. I don't think, in this instance, sir, that you know whereof you speak. It's the jockey's job to give his horse every chance to win, and to NOT help him lose.

Cheers, and safe trips to all.

needler in Virginia 16 Jun 2009 10:45 PM

Just wasn't in the cards for that crowd...#12 will come out of noe where in the very near future...LONG LIVE THE BELL!!!...

Bellwether 17 Jun 2009 12:26 AM

If...if...if. Borel's ride in the Derby is one of the greatest in my lifetime. The Triple Crown remains the ultimate challenge in all of sports...next year!

RSP 17 Jun 2009 7:34 AM

The only horse Calvin was offered to ride at Belmont he was advised not to take.  Point blank, no one wanted to give him experience at Belmont.  

SFP 17 Jun 2009 9:16 AM

I probably agree with the jockey order, Borel for the Preakness and Smith for the Belmont. Borel was going to need the rail for the Preakness to have a shot at winning, I dont know if it was available. Still, MTB ran a good Preakness, even with Smith aboard. The Belmont was guite different. The Dunkirk team ran a brilliant strategy, run a fast opening half, a slow middle, and then ease up to the final quarter. A fast opening half would drain MTB of some of his energy; dont forget he ran both the Derby and the Preakness which Dunkirk did not. Having ran those two races with only 3 weeks in between the last two would deplete any horse at least a little. That strategy saved second place for Dunkirk, but only by a head. It also had the unintended consequence of sparking MTB for a premature start at around the 5/8 pole, when the field began to bunch up. MTB began to creep up to the field which had the effect of sparking him a little too early. All Borel could do was manage it. In the end, MTB had the lead at the 1 3/8th mile mark but began to struggle beyond that which is where the fresher Dunkirk had one last kick left and used it to secure second, but just barely. Summer Bird, also fresher for not having ran the Preakness, had something left for the wire, more than both Dunkirk and MTB. The Dunkirk strategy worked, but just barely. Pound for pound, MTB is the best colt in the land at this time.

Russ 17 Jun 2009 11:05 AM

Mine that bird deserved better. Much better. Nice article Cot.

Poor ride in the Preakness and the worst one could ride in the Belmont. Calvins ride in the Preakness with Street Sense was also very poor. I sure miss the days with riders like Ron T. on Secretariat. Complete goal was just not to screw it up for the horse. Now its about the jockeys and the horse comes second. We should have had at least a few triple crown winners in the past years but these horrible, non thinking,junk rides  have made sure that wont happen. Summer Bird gave me my best day ever at the track. That was too easy. Mine that bird deserved a lot better.

russ maiers 17 Jun 2009 11:11 AM

Mine That Bird wasn't going to win the Belmont if Mike Smith, Jerry Bailey, or the master himself, Eddie Arcaro, had ridden him (all in their prime of course). Yes Calvin should have got some mounts at Belmont. Yes a rail trip would likely have saved energy. However, I'm convinced that--in the BEST scenario--those moves would only have gotten him closer to the winner--Summer Bird.

Scott K 17 Jun 2009 11:46 AM

Actually I think Kent Desourmeaux summed it up best for Calvin when he said this ride proved when he had horse, he could get the job done.  I don't discredit anything said in this article, I just think that a fresher horse won the race, as we've seen repeatedly in Triple Crown attempts.  I remember seeing how Smarty Jones' legs were trembling after his valiant attempt which was thwarted by Birdstone who had sat out the Preakness. Also, Mine That Bird was worked up prior to the race, something he was not in the last two. Let's not blame Calvin for everything.  Mine That Bird is an awesome competitor and I'm hoping we'll see him for a long time. His performance in the Belmont still was a credit to him and his connections.

Karen D 17 Jun 2009 11:57 AM

A wonderful, thoughtful article by Cot Campbell. Mr. Campbell has impressed me in years past with his observations about racing, horse care, etc. He is a very knowledgeable man and is a credit to the sport. I wish all owners were of his caliber. And yes, this was a wonderful Triple Crown this year. No drug debacles like last year with Rick Dutrow and Big Brown. Mine That Bird, Rachel Alexandra and Summer Bird are three wonderful athletes and I wish them safety and success in their racing careers, along with their trainers and owners too.

Smarie 17 Jun 2009 12:05 PM

To SFP, 17 Jun 2009 9:16 am

You know I was wondering if Calvin was even able to get a mount at Belmont prior,or if he had been closed out to prevent him from getting any experience over the surface. It sounds like you know of what you speak, and you have just confirmed my suspicion that the New Yorker's  had closed Calvin out. I only wish he had said so on T.V., at least then he couldn't have been criticized for not riding over the surface before the big race. Just too nice to say so!

The one mount he could have ridden was offered was for 50,000 on the turf going 1 mile, I don't think that would have helped him much for the 1,000,000 mile and half dirt race.

Thank you for the info.

McBeck 17 Jun 2009 12:13 PM

As nice a guy as Calvin is, there's a reason why before Street Sense came along he was never considered a front line jockey.  He got the ride on Street Sense when that one wasn't considered a top horse.  He got the ride on Rachel when she was good but hadn't really showed her greatness.  It think the leash will be very short on Rachel and sometimes wonder if he might not even get the next ride on her.

LAZMANNICK 17 Jun 2009 12:25 PM

IMO, the second mistake pointed out in the article was the crucial one. Calvin guaranteed a victory with RA because he was confident in himself, and her. To leave another horse for RA just shows the connection he feels with her. Remember another cocky upstart who guaranteed a win in the Super Bowl.. Joe Namath. When you fell it, you feel it.However in arriving at Belmont, I believe he lost all focus of his goal. In hindsight he knows he should have ridden a couple of horses on a unfamiliar surface (knew it at the time too, I bet), but getting caught up in all the hoopla, well, you can only stretch yourself so far without something giving. I felt he asked MTB way too early for the gas, ( even Mr. Turcotte stated as such), and that would not have happened if he was a bit familiar with the track. Live and learn, he's not the only one to do that mistake, nor will he be the last. His humbleness is refreshing, and I hope he will get another chance at the big three. Another thing was that MTB was all worked up in knots and just not himself. Calvin is not the goat. If it is true that someone advised him not to ride on track, prior to the big race, then that someone IMO is the goat, for preventing him for getting a feel for the track, (but then Calvin should have spoken up). I'll stop here 'cause I can jump from side to side (Libra).

As for Mr. Woolley, what a walking advertisment for forbearance. In hindsight he probably should have gone with another jockey, but he himself believed in Calvin. Simply put, it was just not to be.

I hope we see more of MTB, a lot of people look down on him 'cause he is a gelding, but if he hadn't been gelded we probably would not have seen him on a track at all. May he join the roster of other great geldings in our racing history.

sweet terchi 17 Jun 2009 12:34 PM

I think Rachel would have won the Preakness no matter who was riding her. She's just the best three-year-old right now. I was dismayed when Mike Smith took off MTB to ride Madeo. Real Quiet and Smarty Jones all over again.

ceil 17 Jun 2009 1:57 PM

Mr Campbells article was great.  Yes Calvin is a hard working awesome rider, yes he was very cocky going in, and oops he made a mistake.  But how about the times he hasnt made a mistake.  There are a lot of if ands or buts going around after the Belmont but let us not forget it is a horse race and we are dealing with humans and animals, not machines.  If I had a horse be it a $5000 claimer or a $1,000,000 stake horse I would feel very confident putting Calvin Borel up

GeeGees 17 Jun 2009 6:12 PM

I too was disappointed in Borel's lack of loyalty to MTB.  I also was dismayed that RT was allowed to race.  We needed a TC winner, and fi, if , if MTB with Borel minus RT had raced, I think the little gelding would have won it - he was that type of horse, Seabiscuit type - plain and scrappy.

merrywriter 17 Jun 2009 6:20 PM

Merrywriter - It really doesn't matter whether Rachel was in the Preakness or not. Mine That Bird would not have won the Triple Crown, because he didn't win the Belmont. Did you miss that?

Port Stanley 17 Jun 2009 9:56 PM

Calvin Borel showed complete disrespect for the game by taking off the Derby winner in the Preakness. It was not about winning the Preakness but about  embracing the moment. If I was the trainer of MTB, Calvin would have been welcomed back on the horse in the Belmont.

Jim F 17 Jun 2009 9:56 PM

"The buildings are taller on this side of the Hudson," was a favorite expression of famed horse trainer Woody Stephens.

As for NY shutting out Calvin, there is a bit of history to support this phenomenon. NYRA refused to let Charlie Whittingham train Sunday Silence at Belmont.

Every Triple Crown winner was based in NY - with the "exception" of Affirmed who trained in CA as a 3yo but trained in NY as a 2yo.

Mark 18 Jun 2009 9:25 AM

I disagree that Borel's becoming a "media darling" is "wonderful for horse racing".  Media darlings are a dime a dozen.  What this sport needs is a jockey capable of blocking out the distractions of fame long enough to win the Triple Crown.    

Borel may have drawn in casual fans interested in the media's heartwarming story du jour.  But I'll bet these new fans will forget about Borel and horse racing as soon as the media focuses on a new darling.    

By all accounts Calvin Borel is a nice guy.  And by all accounts Eddie Arcaro was an ill-tempered SOB.  But if both were racing today, who do you think would sell more tickets?  

My guess is that a truly great Triple Crown winning jockey like Arcaro, complete with his nasty disposition, would draw and keep more fans in this game than Borel's charming personality.

Finally, nobody that I know watches a horse race because of a particular jockey's quaint back story - they watch with the hopes of seeing their favorite horse win.

Steve 18 Jun 2009 10:33 AM

come on Cot...I respect the hell out of ya, and I know you could tell a lot of "war stories", but isn't the easy thing to do is blame the jock?I might expect something like that from Iavarrone, or Dutrow, but after the guy in the saddle wins you the Derby but his split second decisions, why don't we own up[you being of keen horse flesh ilk], give a nod toward the breeders of the thoroughbred industry...horses are not bred[anymore] to run 12 furlongs, it is as simple as that. The main reason that colts can not win the Triple Crown at this stage of their carreer is they ain't got the stamina...case closed. You are someone has the racing public's respect...please don't tarnish the image with this frivilous arguement which does nothing but to cheapen the sport.

nickie 18 Jun 2009 11:23 AM

I find it very hard to believe CB could not secure other mounts on Belmont day or the week leading up to it. If that was the case then his agent is at fault.

MikeM 18 Jun 2009 11:39 AM

Calvin is and will always be a top rider. All of them make mistakes even the Hall of Famers. All horses except a very very small number can not go error free their entire careers.

Allred TopnBottom 18 Jun 2009 12:09 PM

Very well written article. I love MTB and always will.  May he race for years to come.

Barbara W 18 Jun 2009 2:34 PM

IF...If Barbaro had not broken down, we would have had....

Whatever, Mr. Campbell. MTB was a  little rank in the backstretch and Calvin had to let him go. Do you burn him up because you hold him back or do you burn him up because you let him run? Ah, that is the question.

I have met Calvin twice. He is the nicest, most generous guy you will ever meet. You just have to watch him riding ANYTHING during the Churchill Downs meets to realize what a phenomenal jockey he is and a wicked competitor. MTB had been through three Grade 1 races and was showing it.

If Jess Jackson had not run Rachel in the Preakness, to then ruin the chances of a TC...

Calvin has been a wonderful ambassador for the sport and he is a horseman first. He would have won the Belmont if he had had any chance.

ofelia 18 Jun 2009 4:20 PM

Let us not blame Calvin nor his agent for the NY trainers not being willing for Calvin to ride their horses Belmont week.  Calvin, a classy guy, never said no one will put me on a horse, instead he said "you just turn left".  Strange how jockeys who race in the midwest, or PA, or Maryland or horses stabled in PA or Maryland do not get respect from the NY crowd.  If they were good they would be here they seem to think--and it gets them beat, and they think Prado and Desmeaurex are exceptions--it will continue.

Calvin does not deserve this blame, he deserves our respect for keeping NY trainers unwillingness to ride him to himself.

lady suffolk 18 Jun 2009 6:57 PM

I didn't like Calvin taking off Mind that Bird, but he kept a commitment.  He agreed to ride Rachel in the remaining races for the rest of her 3 year old year.  He isn't clairvoyant, who would have thought they would run her in the Preakness.  So he honored his commitment.  Seems ethical to me.  Anyone think he wasn't affected by having to take off MTB, read Woolley's comments on Calvin.  

lady suffolk 18 Jun 2009 7:00 PM

There are plenty of good trainers with good horses at Belmont who would love to be able to get CB to ride there horse. There was no conspiracy to shut him out. Trainers and owners want to win, and they want the best rider possible. If he had no mounts then it was his choice. It doesn't make him a bad guy but he certainly deserves to be secound guessed for his decision.

MikeM 18 Jun 2009 7:54 PM

It was a great three races.    Everyone should be applauded, jockeys, horses, trainers, etc.  My prediction -- the next Triple Crown winner will be a filly -- I wish it were my horse whenever I get her.

Sonia Martinez 18 Jun 2009 9:45 PM

C-Bo didnt move to early. The horse was pulling him. He could have held him back and really made him tired, or let him out some. He chose to let him out instead of fighting him.

Too bad horse racing does not have a more uniform marketing department. Instead of pushing the gambling side, tracks such as Churchill Downs needs to promote the family experience more. This is where the next wave of horse racing fans will come from.

How much fun is it to be at the races with your dad and or mom, pick a horse because Calvin is riding or because it has your grandmas name, and when they turn for home, your horse is rolling and your yelling at the top of your lungs to "get up get up, come on get up!!!" Then as C-Bo walks by, you get an autograph.

Dont know about you, but this is so much more fun then watching people with their pants sagging down, who are paid $20 million a year to play ball.

Horse racing needs to attract more families and promote the memories the races create. Its a great sport.

fire slam 18 Jun 2009 10:56 PM

How can one jump ship in an honorable manner?

Borel has shown himself to be an opportunist. This, more than any miscalculation in the 2009 Belmont Stakes, will derail his induction into the Hall of Fame.

Soldier Course 19 Jun 2009 8:03 AM

An earlier comment I submitted here was a little murky, so:

How can one jump ship in an honorable manner, unless that ship is sinking? Borel was on the Kentucky Derby winner, not the Titanic.

Soldier Course 19 Jun 2009 8:51 AM

Calving blew the Belmont, plain and simple. You cannot make a move at the 3/8 pole and expect to win. Maybe, if he could have gotten a rail trip, maybe. But moving to early and going wide is a recipe for losing. Everyone who knows horse racing knew watching the race that he wouldn't be able to sustain his drive to the finish. He couldn't hold 2nd to a horse who had a fractured leg.

easygoer 19 Jun 2009 10:10 AM

Soldier Course and Easygoer--

Borel did not move too early. MTB was pulling. If you know anything about riding (which i doubt you do) it was best to let him go, rather then fight him. How tired would he had been if Borel had strangled him?

C-Bo was not riding him into the turn. MTB was pulling down the backside, and Borel did what a Hall of Fame Jock is suppose to do--let the horse run.

How can staying with the filly stop him from getting into the hall of fame? He loves RA, and made a very heart felt decision to stay with her. Oh by the way--he won.

He has won two of the last three Derbies, and ran third in the other on Denis of Cork. Also won a Preakness, and in recent years, has won the Alabama, Jim Dandy, and KY Oaks.

Pretty good for someone who has derailed his Hall of Fame chances.

There is  no other jock who could have gotten MTB around the track in and out of holes like C-Bo did.

fire slam 19 Jun 2009 12:31 PM

fire slam:

In a previous career I was a high school teacher. In addition to teaching, I also served as the advisor for the National Honor Society for eight years. I was responsible for tallying the faculty's votes regarding induction into NHS. Not every student who had the requisite GPA got inducted. The criteria were scholarship, leadership, service, and character, and I saw the individual tallies for each one.

I'd like to borrow a few words from Laura Hillenbrand to share what I learned from my NHS experience:

Character reigns preeminent in determining an honor. The faculty members saw character before they saw anything else.

I doubt that the panel members who vote for induction into the Racing Hall of Fame see things any differently.

Soldier Course 19 Jun 2009 1:45 PM

On all three points, Mr. Campbell is right.  First, no one, other than Joe Namath, ever gets to guarantee a victory.  Never. Period.  Second, Calvin let the stars get in his eyes, as if having dinner with the Bushes and the Queen wasn't enough.  Third, he let the the Bird take off too soon in the Belmont.

But I've got a couple of other problems with Calvin that Mr. Campbell didn't mention.  Whether it's a football player high-stepping into the end zone, a basketball player with a dippsy-doodle wide-open slam, or a baseball player running "broken-winged" around the bases after a homer, I don't like the showboating.  And let's face it -- Calvin is the worst offender among well-known jockies, whether it was whooping it up on Street Sense in the '07 Derby, rear-view hamming on Rachael in the Oaks, or that ridiculous finger-wagging on Bird in the '09 Derby.  Ride the damn horse Calvin; the celebration begins on the other side of the finish line.  Plus I think he quit riding Street Sense in the '07 Preakness, letting Curlin catch him at the wire. Watch the replay at full speed and tell me what you think.

And besides -- no one is engaged to the same girl for eight years.  Marry the girl, Calvin, or call her your permanent girl friend, but she's not still your fiance.

Oh, and one other thing -- Mr. Campbell may think that switching jockeys on the Bird would have given us a Triple Crown winner, and he knows a lot more than I do about such things.  But ABC's "virtual" rerunning of the Preakness was totally bogus; you can't put Calvin on Bird, run him on a different route, but have all the other horses run the same race.  Me?  I think Rachael doesn't lose that race.  It may have taken the heart out of her, and she may never have run again, but I think she looks Bird in the eye, wherever Calvin puts him, and she beats him to the wire.

Robert 19 Jun 2009 2:18 PM

This Triple Crown season was unusual, fun and full of extraordinary moments and people.  I loved it!  And Calvin was a huge part of the joy of these races.  Sure, we can play the "if" game, and the "if" game can be lots of fun, but mistakes will always be made - even by horses.  Calvin is hard-working, honest and, most of all he loves the horses.  I love to watch him ride, I love to see him win and I love the way he strokes his horses both in the paddock and after the race.  As far as guaranteeing a win - I'd be willing to bet he'll never do that again.

And, by the way, NeedlerinVA, quite a few of us were not mad at Kent D for a month - he'll never be a hero.  I'm in VA too - where are you?

TerriV 19 Jun 2009 2:32 PM

What I find most amazing is this:  Year after year, riders on favored horses blow the Belmont in the exact same fashion.  The old "don't move too early in the Belmont" piece of advice is not a complex one but time and again the same thing happens.  

jaw jacker 19 Jun 2009 3:31 PM

Fire Slam,your analysis of the race track experience was dead on!

I've only actually attended one race in person - Big Brown's very last race,at Monmouth Park last fall. I'm not a gambler at all, but I had such a blast picking horses in each race. Cheering on my choices was such an adrenaline rush!! Didn't matter that I'll probably never hear of those horses again,it was just such a high watching the competition of it all. I even managed to pick 2 1st placers in addition to my Big Brown pick.

My point is,just the WHOLE race track experience was such a rush to this newbie at the track. I had one of the best times of my life that day,and found myself addicted to racing and the track. Only not for the betting and gambling. And hanging trackside to get a jock's sig. is just the icing on the cake - makes a great day even better!

Thanks,Fire Slam,for putting into words that feeling that I always found so hard to describe.

Interestingly,I was SO looking forward to going to the MassCap at Suffolk this year(never been before) - was hoping my sentimental favorite Commentator would be running again(he won it last year,and Zito likes the Suffolk track),and I'd get the thrill of seeing that beauty run.

Just read here on BloodHorse that Suffolk is CANCELING the MassCap this year due to the economy. The track can't afford it since they increased purses 2 years ago.  

Can someone explain to me how a track could make more money on a regular,everyday race day as opposed to an event day like the MassCap? If you can't afford a big event - which is probably one of the biggest days for the track, in both monies AND attendance - why not knock off a few of those regular race days? I'm sure the event would most likely bring in double,if not more,than any ordinary race,so the track wouldn't be out anything.

Even though I live in MA,going to Suffolk Downs on any given Saturday is a bit difficult for me. I WOULD,however(and planned to)make the trip for the MassCap and the chance to see one of my favorite horses. So they have essentially just LOST money on me by NOT running the MassCap. I may not bet, but I buy refreshments, programs,t-shirts,etc.

So Fire Slam is correct - racing should be focusing on the family aspect of racing. Anyone who thinks that making money off families is impossible has never taken a family of 2 or more kids to any kind of entertainment venue. A Saturday afternoon at the movies can easily cost over $30 per kid when you add in food,

drink,and the video games before and after the movie. Make that parents and 3 kids - you're talking in the area of $150 for a 2 hour trip. Make that a 6 hour day at the track, and you're probably closing in on $1000, just from that one family.  And they haven't made any bets yet.  

There's money in them thar families, and it has nothing to do with gambling.

INNIE 19 Jun 2009 7:23 PM

Mr. Campbell:

How about this scorching hot weather today in South Carolina? We could be in for several more days of it. Stay cool.

Soldier Course 20 Jun 2009 1:18 AM

Thanks, Mr. Campbell, for the excellent article.  You put the Triple Crown races in perspective. I'm a racing fan but not an insider, so I enjoy reading TBH blogs.  I don't know much about Calvin Borel; he may be a perfectly nice guy.  But I agree with Robert; I dislike "showboating."  I hoped Mine That Bird would win the Belmont; but when Borel "guaranteed" a win, I said to myself: That's it.  He's gone too far.  Pride goeth before a fall.  (Unfortunately, I didn't pick Summer Bird!)  I did read a comment during the Preakness-Belmont interim that Borel had no (or little) experience with Belmont track; so, interesting comments from SFP, McBeck and Mark about New York racing.  

Swapsfan 20 Jun 2009 3:59 AM

I was thinking the same ,but u Mr Campell have to put in writing ,similar history was Smart Strike,maybe I see again in Saratoga.

William Cacho.ex rider 20 Jun 2009 11:42 AM

I have to agree with Fire Slam. Borel did not blow the Belmont nor did he need an earlier race on the dirt the day of this Grade 1, as Cot Campbell maintains, to familiarize himself with the track conditions.  The horse he rode in the Belmont was too amped up and too keen. Jerry Bailey saw that and asked Calvin before the race if the horse's pre-race behavior concerned him and whether Borel was worried

about getting Mind that Bird to relax. After the race Bailey commented that the horse was rank down the backstretch at the 5 furlong pole and that Borel was faced with the unenviable choice of fighting the horse and keeping him wrapped up on the rail or letting MTB move up prematurely on the outside and pull him to the lead. If Calvin fought the horse, he would have worn him out. If he did not, he ran the risk of making the lead prematurely with the horse's kick compromised, as Bailey said, to some degree. So it was not Borel's unfamiliarity with the track, but the rankness of his mount and the no win situation it put the jockey in that cost him the Belmont. Interviewed right after the race Chip Wooley said that he wished Calvin had kept MTB wrapped up on the rail and thought the making of the lead was a bit premature, but later acknowledged that MTB was too amped up before the race which placed Borel in a no win position down the backstretch when the horse turned rank. That's the difficulty in guaranteeing a win. There are too many variables in a horse race that no one - even an experienced, well-seasoned rider - can forsee, let alone control. After all, racing does exist on gambling revenue and try as you may no one can reduce it to a risk-free certainty on the level of a science and guarantee a win. There are just too many variables not under the control of a trainer or a jockey to call a race with the certitude Borel did the Belmont. Wooley is right that he had the best horse in the race, but MTB's rankness compromised that advantage. The rankness was more of a training and conditioning problem - not a riding issue. So let's let Calvin off the hook. His ride did not cost MTB the race. MTB's rankness was the culprit.

Will W 20 Jun 2009 12:00 PM

calvin is a true horseman an excellent jock and a great human being what other jockey do you know that cleans stalls gallops horses and is always smiling people make mistakes media attention will disuade most people remember calvin is from louisiana plenty of down home there he is "old school" there should be more riders like him now a days you put on a helmet and walla your a jockey when he came up you worked your way up congrats calvin . jessie baker

blacksmith1972 20 Jun 2009 2:00 PM

Soldier Course--

Dont really care what societies you were head of. Not really sure how that is related to this blog????

However, if your fancy titles make you feel better then most, and more qualified, then good for you.

Pretty sure if panel members don't consider the following traits to be of good character then C-Bo don't want in the hall--hes too good for your kind:  mucking stalls at 4 in the morning, paying tribute to parents after big wins, never turning down an autograph request, and always showing respect towards others when talking.

Hard work is an example of someones character. Some hide behind fancy titles (like you), others go out and actually work from sun up until sun down.

Whats is so ironic, is C-Bo don't bother anyone. He has discovered the secret to life. Find what matters to you, and forget about the critics like you who really don't matter.

Not bad for someone who never finished school and never would have qualified for your elite clubs based on academics.

fire slam 20 Jun 2009 2:17 PM

Mr. Cot Campbell

You told the world in one article what really happened during all three phases of the Triple Crown. Mine That Bird is a sensational horse. Nicely penned!!!

Judy Conley 20 Jun 2009 2:41 PM

fire slam:

Did you forget that you asked me a question yesterday (June 19 at 12:31)?

Your question was: How can staying with the filly stop him (Borel) from getting into the Hall of Fame?

In effect, you were asking me to provide further explanation of the two comments about Borel that I had submitted that morning. I did what you asked and submitted my answer to your question about an hour after you posed it to me.

Your rant posted on June 20 at 2:17 reveals that you not only forgot your question but also your manners.  

Soldier Course 20 Jun 2009 11:29 PM

Soldier Course--

When it comes to folks like you, manners need not apply.

C-Bo is a blessing to horse racing. Leave the man alone. He chose the filly and won.

To take off the Derby winner and stick with a filly, who he has a heart felt connection with, knowing there would be critics, now that is character.

He listened to his heart and won. So go back to your clubs or societies, or whatever they are, and continue to judge people based on your standards.

Not really sorry for busting your bubble, but your not that important.

HORSE RACING NEEDS MORE FOLKS LIKE C-BO.

fire slam 21 Jun 2009 3:20 PM

Soldier Course--

By the way, if the hall selects members based on character over accomplishments, then no one in horse racing would be in.

Every trainer, jock, and owner have been involved in the "giving a horse a race, or schooling them."

This is basically deceiving the betting public, which is anything but good character. I dont know how many times we had a horse making its first start, and would be 3-5 or so, and we would tell the jock to just school them. Needless to say, the horse did not win. Next time out, bam the horse wins

Better rethink character judgments.

Fire Slam 21 Jun 2009 3:25 PM

To everyone who thinks we "need" a Triple Crown winner...no we don't...we need a horse who can win the Triple Crown, whatever the track, whatever the competition, whatever "new and fresh" competitors run, whatever the traffic problems...that's what the 3 TC winners I've had the privilege of seeing did..no one "created" the optimal scenario so they could win.

Looks like Man O'War "spoiled" a TC bid by bypassing the KD and then having the audacity to win the Preakness and Belmont...racing may have "needed" a TC winner and he ruined it....

da3hoss 22 Jun 2009 7:24 AM

Karen D., did KD actually say that "when he had the horse" he could win the Belmont??? With two TC's on the line and his questionable riding in both, especially his ride on Real Quiet, when (arguably) he also moved way too soon for that loooong stretch run, and he's saying BB and RQ weren't enough horse???

Soldiers Course: And he's in the HOF...

da3hoss 22 Jun 2009 7:25 AM

da3hoss:

Yes, isn't that interesting? KD was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2004, four years before the Big Brown debacle. Wonder what would happen if the voting on his nomination took place now?

Soldier Course 22 Jun 2009 9:11 AM

da3hoss:

A bad ride in and of itself will not keep a jockey from being inducted into the Hall of Fame.

There's no better example of that than Bill Shoemaker. Mr. Shoemaker was inducted in 1958, just one year after the 1957 Kentucky Derby when he misjudged the finish line, stood up in the irons prematurely, and cost Gallant Man the win.

But if a bad ride is accompanied by something more, like an ethical or moral issue, that becomes another matter altogether.

Soldier Course 22 Jun 2009 10:06 AM

Soldier Course, KD would still get in because the vast majority of his hundreds & hundreds of rides have earned him that spot...Bill Shoemaker stood up too soon on Gallant Man, Chris McCarron takes the blame for a bad ride that cost Alysheba big time, Pat Day has misjudged the finish line...anyone who plays the game thousands of time in their career and makes only a few mistakes...albeit glaring ones if its a big race...just shows they are human.

I am totally mystified at KD saying "if he had enough horse"...that just boggles my mind...what a diss to BB and RQ, too bad he couldn't be bothered to give SB even one "atta boy" pat for getting him his goal of a Belmont win.

da3hoss 22 Jun 2009 6:21 PM

Cot Campbell's column was terrific; beautiful writing and right on the money.  

Calvin will be OK and give us lots of great rides and "Chip" Woolley should get some sort of award for Gentleman of the Year.

Fritzel 22 Jun 2009 8:51 PM

Cot is generally right on Borel. As someone as put it,he blew it with Street Sense in he 07 Preakness(celebrating early) and never learned from his Street Sense year. He seems like a great guy, but clueless on doing his  pre race homework, interviews, etc.

stakes boy 23 Jun 2009 2:43 AM

Soldier Course--

"A bad ride combined with an ethical or moral decision." Keep your book smarts away from race track blogs. No need for them.

Do you really think pulling Big Brown up in the Belmont was a moral decision? KD saw he was beat, and pulled up.

If C-BO had taken off of the filly, then that would have been a character flaw. Instead, he became the first jock to take off a Derby winner, did it for a filly at that, and then went out and won the race. That took character, courage, heart, and commitment.

Wait a minute, all of those things are what makes a hall of famer.

Fire Slam 24 Jun 2009 3:20 PM

I'm missing something here, ethics and morals equal book smarts????

sweet terchi 24 Jun 2009 10:02 PM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)

Final Turn

Click Here to download BloodHorse.com Widgets!