BloodHorse.com

Search Blood-Horse.com

Get in the 'Zone' - By Bobby Jones

One of my favorite sayings is, “When you hear hoof beats, look for horses, not zebras.” In almost every publication pertaining to our industry, the number-one concern is what to do with the dying fan base at our racetracks—the handle, attendance, VLTs, OTW, ADWs, etc… Not that these concerns are not real problems, I just don’t think they need to be so exotic. My suggestion is not a new one, just another look at the problem. It certainly won’t fix all of the internal problems, but it might help the industry have a better chance at survival.

In times of trouble, and in times of tragedy, in a time when you are seeking comfort, whom do you run to? Family.

Tampa hosted Super Bowl XLIII and did a beautiful job. What I enjoyed watching, besides the game, half-time shows, and commercials, was a show called the “NFL Experience,” a week-long promotion that aired on both ESPN and our local news station. They had fans interacting with NFL activities, like throwing a football through tires and kicking field goals. Some of the folks were competitive, but most of them looked like ordinary people having fun.

I took my 12-year-old son to the 51st running of the Daytona 500. We took off from the farm about 7 a.m., and on our way to the race, my son said, “You know, Dad, I don’t know much about NASCAR.”

To be honest, I didn’t either, but I said, “Well, it’s like the Kentucky Derby for stock cars, and I’m sure we’re gonna have fun!” And fun we had. I think the only thing we didn’t do was drive ’em. We parked, unloaded with cooler in hand, a couple of subs and snacks, a pair of headphones, two ponchos (chance of rain), and after a brisk 45-minute walk, we were in the gate.

I soon learned they had a “NASCAR Experience” located in the infield called the “Fan Zone.” You could buy a pass for $90, so we got two. I wasn’t going to say, “OK, son, let’s go to our seats and sit for three hours before the race.” We took a trolley ride and bang, we were in the “Zone,” and we had a blast!

Much like the paddock area at the racetrack, the back of each garage in the “Zone” horseshoes around the outside of the “Zone.” The backside of every garage had a big plate-glass window where fans could watch each race team get its car ready. There was even an opening at the bottom of the window to get autographs if you were lucky. We weren’t. We got there too late and the cars had already been moved, but I did get two lug nuts from a guy who was cleaning up Mark Martin’s garage. Cool, huh? Besides that, they had a rock band, a food court, beer, lemonade, ice cream, bungee jumping, and a rock climbing wall.

On big racing days with media coverage, wouldn’t it be great to have a “Fan Zone?” Build a couple of stalls and have retired horses with a groom. Show different parts of the horse; maybe have one tacked up with a jockey. Get a big screen TV and show some great races from the past. Have someone demonstrate how to bet, so newcomers are more comfortable doing this for the first time. Maybe invest in a simulator like the ones in the jocks’ room that the kids could ride with a big screen in front of them as if they were in the race. And why not clean up some used horse shoes to give out, or have autographed posters from a jockey or trainer?

The Daytona 500 was won by Matt Kenseth; he got the lead for 15 seconds and had 48 laps to go when the race was called for rain. Were we disappointed? Maybe, only because our driver, Dale Earnhardt Jr., didn’t win. But so what? Eight hours earlier we didn’t even have a horse in the race. We do now and have the hat and shirt to prove it!

Walking 45 minutes back to our truck, in the rain, ponchos draped over our bodies, headphones still on my son’s head, he looked up at me and said, “Thanks, Dad.”

The Thoroughbred industry has always been rich in family tradition, with generation upon generation of horsemen. Family matters all the time, especially in these times.

When you hear hoof beats, look for fans, not just gamblers.

Bobby Jones is the manager of BryLynn Farm near Reddick, Fla.

36 Comments:

Let me add a little academic perspective to this whole issue of waning support for horse racing.

First, I have to say that I am the managing owner of 15 Thoroughbreds.  We breed, board our own horses, start the yearlings and try to race them, all with about 14 other partners who are all new to the business.

I've also been a horse logger since 1994.  That's correct...I fell timber and skid out the logs with teams of draft horses.

Now, having said that, I was once a graduate student studying both molecular genetics and the philosophy of technology.  

Here's where all this preview material comes in!  I promise.

According to some thinkers I agree with, we humans tend to define our experiences through the lens of our current "technosphere".  A hundred years ago, most people were in agriculture, and working horses and riding horses was, well, about the only way to get things done and the main way most folks had to get around.

As life became more mechanized, fewer people worked horses and fewer people's lives were defined by them.

We live in Hardin County, KY...not the central KY most people think of when they think of Thoroughbreds.  We have several different Old Order Amish communities in our area.  They are still largely dependent upon animals for draft work and travel.  Their "technosphere" is similar to our not so distant ancestors.  But these Amish neighbors are our contemporaries.

The age of oil (and other large quantities of concentrated energy)is coming to an end.  NASCAR (Indy car?) vehicles are fueled by methanol if I'm not mistaken.  Methanol can be made sustainably from wood waste and other cellulosic materials, but not in the quantities we are used to using here in the United States.  NASCAR may survive in some form, but my guess is we'll see a movement to electric car racing...and other types of entertainment, in the not too distant future.

Draft horses make a lot of sense in the woods.  Whenever diesel goes way up in price, we get more calls from "conventional" loggers wanting to buy teams.

It's just a matter of time, and waning energy resources, before more people will have a meaningful relationship with the horse once again.  This NASCAR thing will be a blip in 100 years.  The horse will endure.

Anyway, that's the way we see it!

And on another technological note, as energy prices increase, more and more people will make use of internet or phone wagering services.  Yes, this may hurt on track handle, but we need to look at these numbers from a more holistic technological and economic perspective.  

I for one, am quite optimistic about the future of horses and of horse racing.  The events that lead to that more "equine" world may be quite traumatic, but not unprecedented.  Technological change often causes severe trauma and even unrest.  

It's all about the energy.  There's a Saudi Arabian saying that goes something like this:  "My grandfather rode a camel, my father drove a car, my son and I fly in an airplane...my grandson will ride a camel!"

gary 23 Jun 2009 3:44 PM

What your article is about is marketing. The NFL was marketing an 'experience' that was family oriented, NASCAR was marketing an 'experience' that was family oriented. They both had given these efforts a lot of thought and good execution. Gulfstream Park had that as a goal as well. Maybe the vision was a little bigger than Mr. Stronach could chew, but it was taking horse racing outside of the box and attempting to expand the audience to those who had not been exposed before. Churchill Downs did the same successfully on its first night - marketing an 'experience' that included horse racing at night, bands, dancing, food.

What do all of these things have in common? They are marketing outside of their core audience. The core audience that is marketed in horse racing is gamblers, who have ever increasing options other than horse racing. With the previous example in mind, what should the industry do?

Karen in Indiana 23 Jun 2009 5:24 PM

Camels and Zebras notwithstanding, I swear this is the 568th time I have read in Blood-Horse that horse racing needs to be more like NASCAR.

Bengal Bob 23 Jun 2009 5:38 PM

Simply put, follow the example of old Caliente in T.J. Mexico. As I've blogged before, in the 60's and 70's it was the place to be. Unfortunately it burned down in '74. I still think that race tracks would be successful even in these rough economic times if the tracks were opened up to more than just racing/gambling. but as always the politicians have to have their say, which turns everything into "how big will my piece of the pie be", then comes the fighting and then nothing gets done.

sweet terchi 23 Jun 2009 6:17 PM

Great idea, but as other great ideas go in the horse industry, it will fall on deaf ears and nothing will happen because the industry is so resistant to change and everyone wants their piece of the pie.

Bill 23 Jun 2009 7:50 PM

I agree with Bill. I say the same thing all the time. Something needs to change, new people with youth need to come into the game, and not because their family was in it for generations. Obviously those generations are what is holding this wonderful sport back. Along with egos and people who cant think outside their little box.

sophiekea 23 Jun 2009 8:09 PM

There won't be "A Piece of the Pie" much longer if racing people don't wise up. Marketing like NASCAR can only help an industy that is desroying itself because of power and ego. The politicians in Kentucky are in for a big shock when unemployment sky-rockets, businesses close and revenue dries up even more than it has because the horsemen of Kentucky will " pick up their marbles" and go where they are wanted and appreciated, not to mention where the money is better.The voters of Kentucky should remember their names come election time and remind them that they are elected by the people. You can not legislate morality or impose your opinion on other people. On a scale of 1 to 10, gambling is at the bottom. Kentucky is Bloodstock, without this lifeblood it is nothing. Many generations went into perfecting the Thoroughbred in Kentucky, it will take BAD politicans very little time to destroy it if they are not stopped.

Gail 23 Jun 2009 9:57 PM

I’m very new to horse racing but I’m really getting hooked.  I had a ball following all the spring prep races leading up to THE DERBY.

If horse racing has a shrinking fan base then I see the problem as similar to the problem that tennis and golf face.  There are races, matches & tournaments every weekend, but the average sports fan only pays attention to the “majors”.  

Until this year I always felt that the horse racing season was over after the Belmont.  I’m just now finding out about races like the Haskell and the Travers.  Is that the fault of the casual fan?  It seems to me that those races just are not promoted in the mainstream, nor do they carry the status of the triple crown.  I think the fan base could be broader and interest held longer if you had something like an 8 or 9 race championship series instead of just current three.  Points could be awarded for each race with a “major” series race occurring every three weeks or once a month.  Not every horse would or could run every race of course, but more points could be accumulated by running more races.  It would give fans a chance to get more familiar with the top 3 year olds each season.  Horses injured or maturing in the spring could have something to run for after the triple crown.  An over all season champion could be crowned at the Breeders Cup.

It would be great if current races could be included as they are scheduled right now.  If you added the W Va Derby, Haskell, Traverse and Pa Derby to the current triple crown schedule you would have a 7 race series on 7 different tracks with only one purse under one million dollars.  The Breeders Cup would be the 8th and grand finally.  

The running dates for the previously mentioned 4 races are all too close together as they stand right now.  The Woodward and the Jockey Club Gold Cup would fit date wise but I don’t know if they could remain for 3 year olds and up in this proposed series.

It might take some tweaking with dates, purses and possibly qualifications but it certainly would grab my interest and keep it all the way thru November.  My guess is it would drag other casual fans along with me.

Bucky Newguy 24 Jun 2009 10:21 AM

To the horse racing fan, it is mostly about gambling and you can do that over the internet, so i think there IS a big fan base, but you just aren't seeing them at the tracks, for the internet and tv reasons!!!

paul 24 Jun 2009 11:00 AM

Gail so true. Look at what is happening here in Cali. Guvenator wants to kill the goose that lays the golden egg, (selling off Del Mar) which brings in tons of revenue each year, for one paltry sum that will only cover expenses for 6 months if lucky. Horse racing out here, is like a grape starting to wither on the vine.

NASCAR did improve a dying industry,with great marketing and promotion. Although they did get a little too squeaky clean IMO. (But then I was a die hard fan until my "man in black" #3 Dale Earnhardt passed away). For all the greatness that Kentucky offers as the horse racing capital it's a shame to see bumbling of the politicians killing it. Bottom line .. they really need to look at the damage being done, for example here in Cali, and really wake up. You are so right when the dominos fall the result isn't pretty. I know, I live in Cali.

sweet terchi 24 Jun 2009 11:33 AM

I want to be optimistic that horse racing will remain.  That idea of being able to experience more than just the race is an absolutely fantastic idea.  The race itself is a big build up, then in 2 minutes (minus or plus depending on the race) it is over.  Very often the big hype doesn't happen so disappointment prevails.  Then a tragedy such as Eight Belles happens and the nay sayer's are out in force telling everyone how no body loves the horse and how everybody is abusing them.  I for one do not go to the races that often but once in a while I have the opportunity and truly enjoy the experience.  Betting?  I am lost. Each time I learn a little more but the learning curve is huge.  To be able to have someone explain it would be a lot of fun.

I would also love to be able to be more "involved" when getting to the track.  An experience that this person just suggested would be a blast.  To see a "famous" horse and breath the same air would be fantastic.  In fact, I probably could even get my city kid grandkid's to come out and enjoy the day as well.  

Come up with more ideas, don't dismiss them so easily, without them we get no further.  

Thank you for listening.

Beav 24 Jun 2009 1:40 PM

At Santa Anita they have a small corral set up with a retired Thoroughbred just standing out there with a sign attached saying Do Not Pet. Now being as I grew up with horses I ignored this sign and petted the horse anyways but with no one around if someone new to horses period tried this and did not know what signs to be aware of with horses they could have gotten alittle nibble on their hand which could have scared them. They should have had a groom in attendance talking about this particular Thoroughbred and it's accomplishments even if they were few and allowed people the opportunity to pet him and stroke his neck and maybe feel his lips as he took some grass out of their hands. This only promotes horses in general and racing. Yes we need more opportunities as was suggested in this article. Maybe we the fans need to personnally talk to the managers of each racetrack and after awhile it won't fall on deaf ears. It's up to us, the fans, to accomplish what the tracks currently are not doing and promote horseracing as not just a place for Joe Blow the bettor to go but for families and couples dating to go to. We use to take our young boys with us and they have grown up loving the sport. Our middle boy became disappointed when he grew too tall to be a jockey. The racetrack can be a great place for kids of all ages and that's how it should be promoted.

Julie L. 24 Jun 2009 3:56 PM

your comments are excellent. And I wish racetracks had the money to market racing like it should be. Question: What sport, other than horse and dog racing, in America is regulated by its competition, and has a rule making body comprised of members that are sometimes mandated by law where they cannot have any working knowledge of that sport? Horse racing is regulated by and our rules are adopted by state racing commissions. Many states have lottos, run by and owned by the state, who regulates racing. You must be 18 to buy a lotto ticket but must be 21 to bet on a race. Imagine if the NFL, NBA, Nascar or Indy racing had the same disadvantage? They would not be around very long.

eternal optimist 24 Jun 2009 5:35 PM

I agree with Julie L. There need to be horses that people can touch! More interactive activities for fans at the track would be outstanding (but, please, stop booking the lame one-hit-wonder 80's bands).

Also, major races need to be televised on ESPN -- I watch both TVG and HRTV but not everyone has that option -- a G1 race only takes a couple of minutes, so why can't they work it into SportsCenter? These are the horses, this is the importance of the race (establish the leader in the 3YO female turf division? showdown between 2 undefeated horses? they can come up with something), show the race, show the payouts.  How hard would it be?

I also think we need to keep individual horses on the track longer. The economy may help with this. Fans really bond with horses like Zenyatta and Rachel, and don't care if they offer betting "value".

I think the "controversies" over track surfaces, medication, etc. really don't affect casual fans. Even if those things cross their radar at all, I think they just don't want the drama. Preventing catastrophic breakdowns during races should certainly be a priority, however.

I take new people to Santa Anita whenever I can and they universally have a great time. They bet $2 bets and are happy when they win a little, and really enjoy the day. What if every racing fan made a commitment to try and attend live racing once a month during their home track's meet, and to try and take friends/coworkers/newbies with them whenever they could?

I suspect the "lack" of fans really relates to the huge amount of competition racing has for people's time and money. There are so many things people can do for entertainment, and limited money, and with the long hours most people work and commute, limited time. I don't know that there's much to be done about this.

My .05.

Kyri 24 Jun 2009 10:10 PM

Horses are , for the most part, now regarded as pets and family members by thousands of horse hobbyists. These are no blue ribbon chasers, but backyard and weekend trail riders and hackers. Racing needs to clean up. It has a horrible image, perhaps well deserved, that not enough is done to protect the animal. This is a huge turn-off to the average horse lover/owner. And before you protest that there are more stringent rules, I think a wise course would be in zero tolerance. Then, you wouldn't have a trainer who sat out a year, after being caught giving COBRA VENOM (off all things!) as a performance enhancement, right back in a position to abuse the horses, and degrade the sport. It is time to get tough. If you break the rules you can go sell insurance or get a paper route, but you won't be allowed around ANY track. Period.

goodwin 24 Jun 2009 10:23 PM

Gary -- your comments on the "technosphere" and the possible return to a horse-powered world are very interesting and, I think, very perceptive -- have you read this article (www.orionmagazine.org/.../343) -- here's my take on it: www.leftcoastracing.com/.../154

Julie L. -- my home track, Hastings, used to have something similar called the "Discovery Paddock" -- a chance to meet a retired racehorse, along with a groom to provide some background on his career and on racing in general -- it has since been discontinued, alas.

E-man 25 Jun 2009 1:26 AM

I've said this forever....the only marketing the NTRA does is focus on the gamblers/horse players ect.  I don't know why they can't get it through their thick heads that they might want to think in broader way and widen there demographic.  Make it more of a family experience, plan some activities to attract a younger crowd.  If each track made an small attempt to try different approach in marketing think of the movement we could have. It us the fans that have to start it by telling them what we would like to see happen before its to late!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

rowner 25 Jun 2009 3:57 AM

Great ideas, everyone. Based on the blogs I believe horse racing can revive big time if only powers thar be read these blogs. Getting ESPN is key. Kyri is right. I can get the horse racing channels IF I purchase a "package" costing mega $$$. I remember Del Mar used to do a re-cap of the meets races on tv. At 12 midnight. Really, like I have to go to work next day, and I'm going to stay up til 2am!  

sweet terchi 25 Jun 2009 9:47 AM

It's the product, stupid!

Richard R 25 Jun 2009 10:51 AM

one factor in racings decline was that tracks became unfriendly to kids. Some of the patrons did not want kids around and pushed for the tracks to ban them. At a lot of tracks there was a kids pen (playground that was staffed)then the states passed labor laws banning kids from backside work until 18. my brother as well as myself held grooms license in New Mexico at 14 when we first went to Santa Anita hell was raised if he even held a horse for a bath.

my mother had a bunch of kids that wanted her to split tickets with them and they all are still die hard fans. attracting a new fan base is all uphill unless we educate and put our best foot forward. I think handicaping seminars are good but stable tours and early morning events during training hours are better.

LDP 25 Jun 2009 12:08 PM

Ok, in a nutshell, here's what's wrong with the national and state racing, or at least what's wrong with "selling the product" to the media - the NYRA has a web page for Rachel (and it's very nice), and Belmont is having special admissions and bracelets tomorrow, but where's the coverage?

Today's New York Times web page for sports has no entries on horse racing.  No articles in their archives on Rachel since the day it was announced she'd run in the Mother Goose.

Now, the New York Daily News has been covering her, including in their "Day at the Races" column, and maybe they get to more of the fan base.

Sell the product, people, sell the product!

s lee 26 Jun 2009 2:53 PM

The key to Bobby's article is not NASCAR, but what NASCAR is -- it's a league. Until we have a National Thoroughbred Racing League (NTRL) that is comprised of all the racetracks with a national horsemen's association functioning like the NFL/NBA/MLB player's unions, marketing intiatives of this nature aren't going to happen.  Only the big tracks with the biggest days can afford the infastructure on thier own and they don't need to since the big days are already big. My guess is both NFL and NASCAR Fan Zone equipment is owned by the league and not by the individual track/team...

GP In VA 26 Jun 2009 3:22 PM

More performances by the All-Star Buglers.

Mark 27 Jun 2009 11:42 AM

Racing needs to reach the hearts of the people, then the pockets will follow. Gamblers can fill their desire from just about anywhere. True horse lovers and lovers of racing still want to get close to the horses. Especially the ones the marketed ones. The ones that grab their attention and their hearts. How many of us fell in love with racing when our Dads took us to the races. It certainly wasn't because if the gambling. It was the animal attraction. Bring it out!

mary 27 Jun 2009 2:47 PM

 It really annoys me that racing seems to be marketed mostly for gambling. I think there would be a bigger fan base if we could just have more races on TV and not just 3 year olds.  There are great older horses racing.  Let the genral public see them! People don't see or hear about them often enough to identify with them like they do ball players. We need more TV coverage! Poker! is covered,why not horse racing?No lobbyists?  At one time there were horse heroes that warranted news coverage. Now they race just enough to insure their value in breeding. What happened to the Sport of Kings?

J McM 27 Jun 2009 7:20 PM

I'm sorry, if horse racing gets to be like an NFL game or a Nascar race, I would have absolutely zero interest.  Horses have something special, a personality, they are beautiful animals and give so much of themselves.  Yes, I've been to Daytona for motorcycle races but when I get to the point I want to watch a car buzz around in a circle, I will be sure I have gone over the edge!  And, NFL games and players, forget it.  I saw Secretariat win The Preakness, I cried over Barbaro and Eight Belles and screamed with excitement and dlight watching Mine That Bird in The Derby; there is absolutely no comparison whatsoever!  And, I hate boring slot machines, most I ever spent on one was about $1.

Sharon 27 Jun 2009 11:44 PM

Only one other thing to say, put more races on TV!  I am not a gambler so am not interested because I might win some cash.  I just love watching.

Sharon 27 Jun 2009 11:46 PM

GOODWIN.....YOU my friend are on the right track i have been a horse bettor for over 42 years and have seen every scam-sham and other drug related instance you can think off on a racetrack happen..pat v. a perfect example 56 drug bust and breaks before ca. and other jocks banished him..he simply moved to his home state of newmexico was given a license and then louisiana gave him a license. {BUSINESS AS USUAL}..billy patin caught fixing given 5 year suspension,riding like nothing ever happened,its a disgrace and a joke at the same time....LETS talk about the integrity of this game {THERE IS NONE}..SUPER TRAINERS ONE OF MY FAVORITE SUBJECTS...medications-medications = drugs.plain @ simple...remember it took over 150 equine studies and 15 years of arguments in the industry about lasix...a diuretic for bleeding--breathing problems ?? yea sure it is...I want you actually i challenge anyone on this site or anywhere in america to spend 45 minutes grab your form and do the following....i want you to check every race at every track thats available,for every horse thats listed to run that day..lets say 6-7 tracks..perhaps 600 entries and i want you to count the ones on lasix and other listed meds such as bute..this past winter while arguing with a novice horse person on a site i did just that..my findings were 712 horses were entered and 693 were on lasix or bute or both...you might say whats my point,its called integrity of the game,are we on the up and up of course not you would be nieve at best to believe this games on the level...now lets take it a step further and discuss two year olds {BABIES}I WANT YOU TO LOOK AT EVERY TWO YEAR OLD ENTERED FIRST TIME STARTERS in particular and tell me why a horse making its first career start needs to be on medications ????? IS that not absurd in your mind..the supposed super trainers {CHEATS-THEIVES} such as lake,levine,dutrow,mullins,oneill are just that..pretty uncanny that lake or levine can claim a horse from a seasoned trainer who couldnt get the horse to perform and two weeks after the {MAGICIANS} have them there stepped up in class and runaway winners..DRUGS--DRUGS--DRUGS..pretty simple...do the count on the lasix and meds you will find 95-98 percent of all animals on medications.....NEWYORK  was the last great holdout state on meds lasix etc..however the racing secretaries at the three main tracks were forced by the {CHEATS-TRAINERS} to succumb,as they wouldnt ship there horses if they couldnt use the drugs....DEAD-DEAD-game run by pigs and theives...

GAMBLER911 28 Jun 2009 7:14 AM

The racing industry needs to get together in a unified way to market themselves, or else racing will eventually die away as we know it.  Why can't the tracks, owners, breeders and everyone else become nationalized about it and market racing more universally?  I think that is what people keep comparing it to Nascar for.  Nascar has an excellent marketing stratagy, its cohesive, tight, well planned, and UNIVERSAL. They advertise EVERYWHERE, like in Happy Meals, K-mart t-shirts and ball caps, jars of peanut butter, and every other piece of junk you can buy.  Think about it- there's only one Nascar race on A WEEK, and not even all year round.  But you can never escape their advertising.  It's EVERYWHERE! I don't follow car racing at all, but I do know who Jeff Gordon and Tony Stewart are- they are on the box of cereal right in front of me.  If the horse breeders and owners feel too exclusive to participate in such "exploitive advertising" then of course horse racing will peter out.  I went to Florida for the first time during spring break, and stopped in at the huge welcome center at the state line.  Of all the thousands of leaflets available on Florida destinations, there was only ONE leaflet with 2 paragraphs advertising the horse industry in Ocala.  There was not one page in the building mentioning Gulfstream, Calder, or Tampa Bay racetracks at all.  I verified this with the clerks that worked there.  There were dozens of people milling around there just looking for some destination, and this right at Florida Derby time!  The industry has got to come together as a whole and they know what to do.  Get mastermind marketers (see what Disney does)and do it before racing caves in on itself.  It may just go back to being The Sport of Kings, and the claiming game will fade out.  The industry needs to support itself, not bring in VLT's prop it up.  In the long run, it's not financially healthy.  What I am surprised to discover as well, is that many of the people who are PETA aware and disillusioned with racing are horse owners themselves.  At a stable I ride at in Kentucky, I am the only horse racing fan there.  They (and they're not the only ones) think the horses are all doped up, and slaughtered in the end.  The first question people ask me is "have they come up with a national plan to do away with all drugs in horse racing?"  Another "universal" problem. Thanks, Maggie

Maggie 28 Jun 2009 8:56 AM

Oh, by the way- here's some feedback from many people I know who have seen TVG and HRTV:

"Why do they keep showing those seedy male enhancement commercials? I don't want my kids seeing that.  It gives racing a bad name, like it's being marketed to dirty old men- not for families".  Just a thought...

Thanks, Maggie

Maggie 28 Jun 2009 8:59 AM

Too much emphasis on gambling and not enough on horses and people who love them.  Even the ESPN coverage is primarily on gambling more than anything.  I got hooked on racing because of the horses (Secretariat), not because I expect to win money -- for that I can go to any of a number of casinos in my area.  I go to the track to see the beautiful horses and thrill to their accomplishments.  My local track if the Fairgrounds in New Orleans - they do a nice job of getting local interest - often they have pony rides for the kids and let people into the grandstand for free now.  But more could be done -- I would love to see a backside tour of the Fairgrounds, get up close to a real race horse and hear more.  You could probably get fans to volunteer to staff such a tour.  

I was at Jazz Fest this past year and a young couple was passing by the grave of Black Gold and wondered aloud about what the monument was all about.  I told them everything I knew...

mrw31 28 Jun 2009 11:54 AM

Indy car racing is also hurting. They have one big day Indy 500, and the rest of their races are barely watched, live or on tv. Danica Patrick got renewed interest on her first couple of years, but the novelty has wanned off.

Ted 28 Jun 2009 5:56 PM

This is a very interesting discussion. I only started going to the track at Oaklawn in Arkansas in the last four years and the reason why is I thought it was expensive to go to the track. To my amazement i found out i could get in the gates for only $2.00. I had a wonderful time watching the races and I went home and told my friends it was only $2 to get in the gates. They were all amazed and ever since then we have been going down by the fours to watch.

I can't think of any other place a person can go and watch beautiful horses run and later i found out many tracks don't even charge an entrance fee.

I think that if more people understood it was also a family experience. I had the oportunity to go to Keeneland the day they had Breakfast with the Jockeys. It was great and Patty cooksey was ther and personally setting children up on an equisizer horse and jockeys gave autographs. It was a lovely experience.

Making the track family friendly as well as gambler friendly takes some doing but Keeneland seems to have a good grasp on the balance.

The idea of having educational horse areas is great. Every track I have been to seems to have some "dead" space in it that could be brightened by such exhibits. FRom what I know though some of the track owners do not realize this in their heart. Unfortunatel a number of them only see the $ signs and do not see that by including these events those $ would go up and enhance horse race image.

Golden Gate 29 Jun 2009 1:01 AM

I was at Hastings Park in Vancouver BC Canada a few years ago, and they had a display of racing equipment; such as saddles, boots, etc. You could pick them up and see how light they were. Also there was a retired racehorse in a stall nearby that you could pet. There were also several  people who would answer questions about racing, betting, etc. I am a big racing fan, and have been for years, and I enjoyed all of it. I was with a friend who is new to racing and she really enjoyed  learning more about all the various aspects of the sport. I doubt this type of thing would cost very much. There are probably people who would love to volunteer to answer questions. I think more tracks should try something like this.

karmadillo 29 Jun 2009 11:31 AM

okay its all about  the horse!!!  the trainers,  the jocks. its  what we want to see , but they are hidden  and  do not always come to  there adoring public. this must change, there needs to be a understanding  that we need to feel part of it.  and just  not  a two dollar win bet  to remember the day by, but a place  where  there are shirts, caps, books, model horses. artisins  who paint  and  and take photos of our  champs , special giveaways more  to atract new fans  . it must be a fair like atmosphere where  the horse is king everything  the horse  and not just tb  but  the beauty of  the creature it self build it  and they will come by the droves!! like  and expo!!!  nyfalcon

nyfalcon 30 Jun 2009 10:40 AM

I have TVG but I never watch it, why? It is all about betting and not about the horses. Racing needs to stop ridiculing horse lovers like the Fans of Barbaro and start advertising to them.

There are millions of horse owners in the USA. I ride at a barn with fifty horses that has over 30 kids in a 4-H group and their parents mostly ride too and there are about 20 adults that take lessons in addition to the 4-H group.

Everyone loves horses but almost all of them think horse racing is bad. They think the horses are drugged or abused, they think the tracks are just for gambling and drinking. They would never take their kids or let them watch. They don't even watch the Kentucky Derby. They have negative feelings all the way around about horse racing. They are not alone.

Recently, some of them have been watching Jockeys on Animal Planet and are becoming more interested in racing. One watched the Preakness because Mike Smith was riding Mine That Bird. She has made a living with horses for twenty years but never watched a race before....

I think there are many more horse lovers out there than there are horse players....

Lee 16 Jul 2009 3:45 PM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)

Final Turn

Click Here to download BloodHorse.com Widgets!