BloodHorse.com

Search Blood-Horse.com

Good Sense - By Martin Stiles

"That ’ampstead, ’e’ll never ’urt ’imself!”

The speaker, an Englishman from the class that drop their aitches, was doing time in the United States breaking yearlings. Hampstead, the yearling just then cantering past us on the training track, was my first racehorse, having been foaled from my first broodmare.

What was the real meaning behind the trainer’s remark? He was clearly passing judgment on the colt’s potential, which he did not rate very high. (Hampstead, by Beau Prince—Sun Miracle, by Heather Broom, was gelded soon thereafter, and eventually won several claiming races.) I took the trainer’s remark to mean that he felt the colt lacked the competitive fire that characterizes the best runners, and which is generally believed to make horses more subject to break down. I also detected a note of admiration for the colt who had the good sense to keep well within himself, to “take care of himself” while performing. Many times during the subsequent 40 years, I have asked myself whether the goal of breeders shouldn’t be to produce horses with good conformation, good speed, and good sense.

It seems likely that one reason speed has become such a dominant ingredient in the recipe followed by Thoroughbred breeders is that it is so readily quantified. At a sale of 2-year olds in training, workout times like :20 or :21 for a quarter-mile attached to an entry will virtually guarantee a good price but provide no assurance the individual will ever want to run farther than a quarter-mile, or remain sound long enough to earn back his purchase price. It would be of some help to buyers and sellers of young horses if there were a numerical scale that rated certain of the horse’s other qualities in the same way the speed figure does.

One small step that could be taken to provide some indication of stamina in a pedigree would be to make greater use of the statistic “average winning distance.” AWD is seldom encountered in the American horse literature (it can be found on bloodhorse.com’s Stallion Register Online), never in sale catalogs.

Similarly, the number of starts made by each of the runners in the first two or three generations of a pedigree could help to identify the families that turn out tough runners. Horses that fail to earn black type nonetheless contribute soundness (or unsoundness) to a pedigree, and that important fact ought to be recognized.

Federico Tesio, the brilliant Italian student of pedigrees, who more than anyone else put his ideas to practical use (he was the breeder of both Nearco and Ribot), considered that the aim of the breeder was to produce a racehorse that “over any distance could carry the heaviest weight in the shortest time.” Success in meeting this standard could be measured by the use of tools no more complicated than a stopwatch and a set of scales. But the horse is a complex machine, and his performance is likely to be influenced by factors that these simple tools cannot measure.

Since Tesio’s time (he died in 1954), it has become almost routine to use the laryngoscope, radiographs, and ultrasound to check sale horses for abnormalities. However, to date, these diagnostic techniques serve merely to locate animals whose sale may be voided. No scale has been developed by which objective scores that are generally accepted can be assigned. Many experienced horsemen feel the links between racing performance and the data from these sophisticated instruments are not fully established. More research is evidently needed before some of these powerful tools can be used to a breeder’s best advantage.

More daunting still is the challenge posed by the “good sense” factor. It has long been recognized that a balance between brilliance and toughness is desirable in a racing animal. The theory of dosage as developed by Franco Varola and others is an outgrowth of that idea.

Dosage theory has been useful in planning matings and focusing attention on the need for balance in a pedigree. The temptation to use dosage as a handicapping tool proved irresistible, which led to some undeserved loss of credibility. However, the basic principles of the theory remain valid.

Keeping always in mind that the racecourse is the proper venue for testing Thoroughbreds, breeders should aim at the production of runners whose performances reflect the right balance among toughness, speed, and good sense.

Martin Stiles, and his wife, Martha, bred group winners Hardgreen, Castle Green, and Canadian champion Buckys Solution at Stockwell Farm in Bourbon County, Ky.

16 Comments:

Why would the breeders want to emphasize stamina?  There are practically no races farther than 1 1/16 miles any longer (and not many of those).  Just this year, they shortened the Fountain of Youth stakes to 1 mile (and everybody hailed the idea). And I remember when races under 6 furlongs were only for young 2 year olds.  Now, there are tons of 5 and 5 1/2 furlong races for older horses.  If you have a horse with stamina that isn't top class, you have no place to race.

FourCats 14 Jul 2009 3:16 PM

You are correct in your points, unfortunately the novice investment portfolio rules the marketplace and it says: "speed, now, profit, now".

It's pathetic that two-year olds in training have to "recover" from the sales ring.

da3hoss 14 Jul 2009 5:28 PM

Breeders don't breed for the track any more, they breed for the sales. So you end up with a horse like Storm Cat, whose get have breathing and knee problems galore, as a top stallion. Why? Because his get bring high prices at the sales, not because he throws sound horses with stamina. The breeding business has been taken over by people with what I call "investment banker mentality", they aren't looking to breed a good horse, they are looking for a profit at the sales, the bigger the better. And when you don't look past the yearling and early two year old sales, you are less likely to breed a sound runner than you are if you look further into the actual career of the horse you are breeding. So if you want horses with stamina, speed, and good sense, don't look to the big breeders, they are into the sales results, look to the small breeders who breed for the track. The ones who breed and race their own horses. That is where the sound and sensible horses will be. Not at the big breeders where the goal is to get them to the sales rather than the track.

Stephi S. 14 Jul 2009 5:29 PM

I agree with the idea of including the AWD in a catalogue.

That information could also help a Breeder in the choice of their next Stallion as well.

But, if you show the total number of starts of each horse in a catalogue, then Couldn't that also hurt the sale amount for that foal ???

Especially if it's a foal or Grand foal of Unbridled's Song who most already know don't make too many total starts in their lifetimes.

They may run Great in those few starts, but you know they won't last too long.

CRob87 14 Jul 2009 5:39 PM

I agree with the prior comment that it seems there are not as many distance races carded.

The racing secretary cards the races knowing the stock on hand, and with the trainers requests in mind. I say breed for stamina and distance. If the demand is there for distance races, they will be carded.

There are graded races at a mile or shorter, but the graded races over a mile, they are the races that are regarded as being truly Classic.          

Kevin 14 Jul 2009 6:01 PM

The Europeans have proved over and over each year at the Breeders Cup how much better they are than the American horses, its more than obvious. If I had the money to purchase a race horse I wouldn't by anything bred in america or with american bloodlines.  I'd be going over to Europe to buy yearlings.  Wait until this years Breeders Cup when the europeans finish 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Classic; not only do the europeans run better on the turf they are better on the synthetic surfaces as well, so where does that leave american bred horses..?  They'll all be running in the Synthetic Sprint or the Synthetic Mile.

Whatever 14 Jul 2009 6:42 PM

To Whatever - Raven's Pass was bred in Kentucky, as was Henrythenavigator.

Port Stanley 14 Jul 2009 7:28 PM

To Whatever:  Aside from last year, when have the European horses proved over and over at the Breeder's Cup that they're better than the Americans?  

USA bred and/or based horses have won 8 out of the last 10 BC Classics, 10 of 10 Ladies Classics, 10 of 10 BC Juveniles and 10 of 10 BC Sprints.  I could keep going but I think you get the point.  

The Euro-breds only win the BC turf races with any consistency but even on turf they've not shown significant dominance.  For instance, horses without any USA breeding in their first generation have only won 4 of the last 10 BC Turfs.  And even those 4 had "American bloodlines" in their second or third generation.  

So again, where's the "more than obvious" proof that Euro bred horses are better?    

Sydney 15 Jul 2009 12:42 AM

A good number of European-trained horses are either American-bred or have American bloodlines not too far back, I suspect it's more a training/environment issue there.

As for the article, I fully agree, there are a number of things that need to change in the way Thoroughbreds are bred, raised and trained, for starters giving them a proper start so they stop becoming the crackheads of the equine realm would help. I'm actually using this as the basis for my business plan in a college course, I still need to figure out some things though like how much to pay the management team, haha.

Tony Cheval 15 Jul 2009 1:08 AM

I breed horses that first and foremostly are bred to win at the race track.I would not breed a horse that I would not race myself because many times I have to in order to sell them at the track. I am also a commercial breeder that is a realist and must provide the market what it wants or else I wont sell enough horses to stay in business. As a result we are ranked one of the top breeders of money winners in N/A by the Jockey Club with an average stud fee of $7700 for our runners.

edzepplin 15 Jul 2009 12:18 PM

Look guys...It is not a question of breeders or how or what they breed. Its about too many horses, too many unsound or poor performing stallions, money being made at sales rather than on the track, and too many races to fill, all available at the same time at locally competing tracks. The tracks think there a shortage of horses to fill their races. How insane. We simply have too many races at too many tracks running at the same time. The great majority are short, taking advantage of the existing horse population, whose quality has dropped due to overbreeding due to a once inflated sales market and too many available races. Take a look at the extended Mid Atlantic Region; You have Belmont, Monmouth, Phila Park, Delaware, Laurel, Penn National, Charlestown, and Colonial Downs most of which card dominately short races with 6-8 horses per race if they are lucky. Other than a few turf distance races generally the longest race you find is 1 1/8 or 1 1/16 and then there are only a few of those. Laurel has a great turf course but shuts down during some of the best turf season. At least that permits Colonial Park turf racing to prosper. This is a good example of what should be done to help fill races, but even this only works for Colonial. Laurel gets little in return other than the chance to save purse money. The sales market downturn hopefully will result in a correction. Fewer horses being bred will drive quality over numbers for breeders, sellers, and buyers. There will be less pin-hooking and more breeding or buying to race. And tracks will be forced cut races due to fewer horses. I don't see the problem,  and it could be the fix we need.  

Race Fan 15 Jul 2009 1:10 PM

CRob87 - I put about zero store in the AWD because it doesn't give a true picture of the horse's inate abilities, but what he was trained for.  I know horses bred to run 1-1/2 easy that broke their maidens at 6 furlongs and were never given a chance at longer than 7 furlongs because their trainers didn't know how to train for distance.  We could improve the breed a lot if we made trainers go through a training course (no pun intended) to learn how to condition different types of horses.  How about onsite seminars for trainers on how to condition a horse and not run him into uselessness?  I'd be for that.  It's only part of the problem, though.

Little Guy Breeder 16 Jul 2009 4:56 PM

Increasingly, the rest of the horse industry considers 'race-bred' Tbs to be conformational train-wrecks, with only the lines that tend to produce the turf and distance runners as likely to produce animals that aren't one-dimensional sprinters who will break down by age five.

It used to be that the Thoroughbred was the ultimate equine athlete which would improve all other breeds, but that is fast being lost.

I suspect it won't be many decades before the racing Tb industry is in trouble because there will be no after-race market for them.  Who wants a horse with long pasterns, straight shoulders, a long back (often with poor loin connection) and a goose rump? No one but the race industry, where there are plenty of expensive stallions with those faults.

The industry needs to ask whether they want to breed for the two year old quarter mile sprint or the ultimate athlete: the well balanced horse that will run a mile at close to 40mph at age four or five soundly.  If the former, the general public opinion of racing will only worsen as careers shorten, more horses break down, and the after-race market declines. Do we want our industry to be classed with grey-hound racing? Because that is where it is heading in the eyes of the general public.

The Jockey Club should be a breed standard and a breed registry, horses should be eligible for breeding only if they meet certain standards of speed, stamina, soundness and conformation.  But that won't happen, too much money would be lost.

robnrun 18 Jul 2009 1:47 PM

If you want to know what the perfect horse should look, race and be like as a stallion then Seattle Slew is the one for you!

The perfect mare is Dahlia!

The perfect filly is Rags to Riches

The perfect racehorse is Cigar.

The perfect hurdler/handcapper is Sea Pigeon

The perfect stayers are Brown Jack and Yeats

The perfect chasers are Captain Christy, Grand Canyon, Tingle Creek, Desert Orchid, Kauto Star and Arkle.

The perfect Flat/hurdler/chaser is Alverton

The perfect up and coming racehorse is SEA THE STARS!!!!!!!!

Well in my totally biased opinions they are!

Other perfect stallions include  (in my book at least!) A P Indy, Tapit, Pulpit, Malibu Moon, Perfect Accolade (well he would have been!)  Dubai Millenium(ditto), Shamardal, Dubawi, Echo of Light, Giants Causeway, High Chaparral, Galileo, Montjeu, Hernando, Cape Cross, The Minstrel, Nijinsky, Northern Dancer, Storm Bird, Storm Cat, Anything with Seattle Slew in the pedigree (well I did say I was biased!), L'Emigrant, Halling, Polish Precedent, Singspiel, Carnegie,  all the Darley Stallions in fact, Nashwan, Unfuwain, the Gainesway Stallions.  Any Stallion belonging to the Maktoum family, Sinndar, Dalakhani, Daylami, Kalanisi, The Aga Khan's line, Tiznow, Lemon Drop Kid oh and many more!  You get the jist!

This is just my personal opinion.  No one has to agree!

God Bless

Best wishes

Abbie

Abbie Knowles 19 Jul 2009 9:41 PM

If soundness, stamina and a good mind were sought-after traits, then people would be beating Coolmore's doors down to get to Yeats as a stallion.

Regarding the Storm Cats, they became valuable and stayed valuable for two reasons: first, despite the soundness problems that limited the careers of many, while they lasted they were GOOD.  Economically you're better off having a racehorse that has a successful short career winning valuable stakes than having a racehorse that has a long career as an also-ran.  Second, many of Storm Cat's sons, even the ones that had abbreviated careers, became successful sires.  That's the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, what everyone is looking for: the successful sire of sires.  Storm Cat has two sons in the top 10 general sires list, and a total of 12 in the top 100.  They didn't get there by siring horses that couldn't run.  

If you want to shape the breed, you have to make the purse money go the way you want to shape it.  Currently, how many graded stakes races are there at 1-1/2 miles of longer on the main track (dirt or synthetic)?  More to the point, what percentage of non-stakes races, the bread-and-butter for most owners, trainers and breeders, are carded at distances of 1-1/2 miles or longer?

You want to change the breed?  Then mandate that for every race written at 6 furlongs, a comparable race for 1-1/2 miles or longer has to be carded.  And add a bonus to the purses of longer races.  

Karin C-C 20 Jul 2009 1:31 AM

Yeah Yeats is wonderful!

Wonderful to look at.  Pure Class as a racehorse!  He is trained by a Master of his profession whose attention to detail is legendary!  Aidan O'Brien ranks right up with the best of the best!  But there are a lot of brilliant trainers around worldwide!

Storm Cat and his line are great!

BUT Seattle Slew rules ok!!!!!!

God bless all true horse and animal lovers!

Best wishes

Abbie

Abbie Knowles 20 Jul 2009 1:55 PM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)

Final Turn

Click Here to download BloodHorse.com Widgets!