BloodHorse.com

Search Blood-Horse.com

Take Two - by Steve Haskin

An unusual article appeared in the Aug. 21 New York Post. TV critic Linda Stasi not only reviewed Animal Planet’s reality series “Jockeys,” she gave it four stars.

Stasi wrote: “Possibly the most exciting unscripted show on TV is one you probably haven’t ever watched—or, at least, one I’ve never watched before.

“And what a loser I am for having not reviewed the first season of ‘Jockeys,’ an Animal Planet show more about the human animal than the equine…There’s not another TV show like it (except perhaps “American Idol,” where each episode is so unbearably tense).” 

Racing cannot buy publicity like that, especially in the New York market. Actually, Stasi started watching at the right time, as season two far exceeds season one, even though the show still is just as manipulative (as are all reality shows), and the Trevor Denman voiceovers are just as annoying. And the producers are more spill-crazy than ever, showing the same spills over and over.

As for the first season, they are still getting mileage out of that staged scene in the jocks’ room where an angry Jon Court throws all the equipment off a shelf. Thank the director for that fabricated scene. And, finally, it is understandable why they had to change around the order of the Breeders’ Cup races to fit the “script,” but to make the Breeders’ Cup a three-day event was laughable.

But enough about last year. This year’s first episode was compelling throughout, thanks to the Bullybullybully–Kristin Mulhall–Chantal Sutherland cloak-and-dagger segment, where they attempt to hide the unraced 3-year-old’s work by sending him out in company, and on the inside, under the cover of darkness for fear of losing him in his upcoming claiming race. Mulhall is a horse lover before all else and she had a love affair going with “Bully.” It also gave the viewer an inside look at the claiming game, which normally goes unnoticed. The producers did a great job of filming trainer John Sadler, one of the shrewdest claiming trainers in California, supposedly watching the work, supposedly eyeing Bully in the paddock before the race, and putting in a claim (we don’t even know if the claim he put in was for this race). But an effective piece of film editing made it look like he was interested in Bully the whole time and had put in a claim for the horse, which would have broken Mulhall’s heart. Even showing steward’s aid Heather Coreija, who works in the paymaster’s office, walking toward Bully with the dreaded red claim tag was well orchestrated and added to the tension. And then when she tagged another horse you wanted to let out a sigh of relief. It was great drama and had me on the edge of my couch.

Then there were the riveting segments on racing’s bad boy Corey Nakatani, from his altercation with fellow rider Iggy Puglisi in the jocks’ room to appearing before the stewards for some overly aggressive riding to old footage of him pushing another rider off his horse just after the finish line. Every reality series needs someone like Nakatani, and his addition was another big difference between last year and this year. Imagine the very first “Survivor” without Richard Hatch.

What is so encouraging about season two is that the best is yet to come. Next week we get to see series regular Aaron Gryder romp in the world’s richest race (that’s richest race, not “biggest” race, as was stated in the show), the $6-million Dubai World Cup Sponsored by Emirates Airline (UAE-I) aboard Well Armed. And the series will conclude with two stories the producers couldn’t have made up —Joe Talamo having to deal with the scratch of his Kentucky Derby Presented by Yum! Brands (gr. I) favorite I Want Revenge the morning of the race, and Sutherland, after returning to Canada, watching in disbelief as her old friend from last year, Mine That Bird, trounces his foes in the Derby. Talk about mixed feelings and what might have been.

Season one was well intentioned with too many flaws and too many dead moments. Season two, so far, hits it out of the park.

45 Comments:

Yes, the voice-overs certainly seem a bit un-natural.

Virgil Vox 25 Aug 2009 11:59 AM

I'm glad season 2 is looking better.  I only watched a couple shows from season 1 before deciding it wasn't worth the time.  I was hoping to see some horse racing action and instead got an overdose of the Sutherland-Smith soap opera.  

Mary 25 Aug 2009 12:07 PM

It seemed that the first minute of the show, upon returning from EACH commercial break, was a 'mini re-cap' of the entire episode up to that particular point.

Kinda like a 'in case you are JUST joining us'. They feel the need to get everyone 'up to speed'.

I'm sure you know what I mean, Steve.

It was a real drag, especially in the 30 minute (really only about 22 minute) format.

And with all the repeating, reusing, re-capping, the amount of original material is probably even less than 20 minutes.

If you tune in late, TOO BAD.  TIVO it, tape it, wait for a re-air, watch it on the internet.

Great concept.

As you say, "well intentioned" first season.

Here's hoping for a well executed second season.

Virgil Fox 25 Aug 2009 12:26 PM

I can't wait to see how they edit the Mine That Bird win in the Derby...splitscreen from Cotey and Sutherland at Woodbine as MTB and Borel scream to the lead!

I can't think of a single Woodbine patron I know that thought MTB had a chance.

Keith - TripleDeadHeat 25 Aug 2009 1:22 PM

I really enjoyed the first season of Jockeys but then I would enjoy just about anything about horses or racing.  The first show of the second season was an amazing jump up the scale. Racing really needs to push this show - it is such a fascinating glimpse into the unknown for most of us.  I can't wait for the next episodes. Maybe with a little expert advising they could fix those annoying parts.  Wouldn't Eddie Arcaro have been a great jockeys star!

TerriV 25 Aug 2009 1:40 PM

Thanks so much for bringing Linda Stasi's review of "Jockeys" to our attention. I'm gratified to know that someone else shares my initial and completely unexpected belief that it is one of the "most exciting unscripted shows" on TV. Although I began watching out of curiosity, by the end of the first season I was convinced that it had become a marketing tool of sorts for the racing industry. (I even suggested this on one of Jason Shandler's blogs when he posed a question about the need for better advertising within racing.) With the right audience, the excitement of racing's reality can sell itself. Indeed, these are stories the producers couldn't have made up, and they are sparking interest in Animal Planet viewers with no prior knowledge of horses or racing. Again, thank you, Steve, for bringing this to our attention!

Karen in Texas 25 Aug 2009 2:08 PM

The Sadler claim was in a different race. If it was the Bullybullybully race, he claimed a gray in a race with no gray. Heck, maybe the claim tag scene wasn't even a Sadler claim, it was just a generic scene that they inject into their story. Just another one of their many deceptive edits.

MH 25 Aug 2009 2:27 PM

I'm still watching Jockeys but I'm not sure why they need to play so fast and loose with their facts.

What was the point of making a vague claim about steroids in racehorses being a problem, very quickly mentioning that they had been banned, then showing a horse acting up... in a perfectly normal TB way that most likely had nothing to do with any medication?

And, OK, I understand why Bullybullybully (who I wonder where he is now??) had to go in MCL to make the starter allowance condition, but why did he have to go in starter allowance to then go in stakes races, as the narrative claimed? Is this a condition for some of the Cal Cup races or something?

HATE the fake race calls. They could have the real calls and just show a graphic pointing out where the riders are.

There may be a future episode where I show up, because they filmed right next to me a couple of times, but I think they were focusing on the "beautiful people" who were at the track for the first time. LOL

Kyri 25 Aug 2009 3:22 PM

The Trevor calls are for regular people who don't understand racing.....and all that complain should understand that.  If you like horse racing you are the minority of the ones watching this show.  Whatever can help the this fading industry is great!  People who complain about the editing must never watch the news b/c everything you watch is taken out of context....these are great stories for entertainment.  This show could on its own save this dying sport.

BestThingEver 25 Aug 2009 3:36 PM

That's funny, Steve, a claim you know wasn't made but it still had you "on the egde of your seat"...I haven't watched because of the spills...

da3hoss 25 Aug 2009 5:42 PM

I did see in an episode preview the "ruthlessly competitive rival trainer, Bob Baffert"...let me know how that one goes...geesh.

da3hoss 25 Aug 2009 5:46 PM

Dahoss, I sent that synopsis to Baffert for his enjoyment.

Steve Haskin 25 Aug 2009 7:40 PM

I watched a couple of episodes from the first season of "Jockeys", then bailed. TMI in the Smith-Sutherland drama.

But I am glad that the series was renewed and is getting good press in its second season. This has to be good for racing.

Soldier Course 25 Aug 2009 7:49 PM

I like the show .I watched all the shows last year and the new one so far this year. Love the jockeys and really like Mike and his girlfriend. I think it could be a good show for people who don't know horse racing.

Rita 25 Aug 2009 7:50 PM

For those who said they want more racing? Well that hasn't gone over like it should, see ESPN bidding on racing then cutting program and race after race. TVG has All Access, you can hear what goes on in the paddock, at the gate, in the race and after the race.

Everyone says the 'human' stars need to be marketed as much as the equine because the latter come and go. That's what this show is trying to do.

There's plenty of racing and jockeys etc talking and showing how they feel about certain horses (like Kristin).

A surprising comment from someone on here who 'says' they want to be in the industry, they don't watch the show?  Do people prefer to assume what really goes on, put words into others mouths or just live in their own fantasy world what it's like?

A little drama sure but a format lots love now and actually fairly realistic. Some jockeys come off as arrogant and needing to be taken down a notch and some come off as the nice guys/girls they are.

Bob, is funny and laid back but while not ruthless maybe, he has been known to be biting and make a comment or two that really p.o.'d people and his battles during the early Derby days and the BIG Lewis era, he and Wayne WERE bitter rivals.

Tim G 25 Aug 2009 8:43 PM

Hey Steve,

    I loved the first episode as well, and was watching intensely waiting for Sadler to claim Bully. I was so happy when he didn't. Corey was rather interesting to say the least. Though being that aggressive does not make him a favorite of mine. I can't wait to see the next, espcially if it is going to show Well Armed in his Dubai Demolition in the World Cup.

LDP 25 Aug 2009 8:56 PM

Ok, I'll admit I watched the series last season and did enjoy it, once I got past the part of seeing the same spills over and over.  The race calls...I don't think I can get over that, but if it helps pull people into it at all, encourages some one to go out to their track to see what it's all about, I can endure a few minutes of Joe Talamo leading at the quarter pole.

txhorsefan 25 Aug 2009 11:17 PM

I think Jockeys does a great job of getting new fans interested in horse racing and also gives current fans an opportunity to get to know the trainers, horses, and, of course, the jockeys, on a very different level than just reading a past performance line. Whenever I am now watching a race on TVG or HRTV, the first thing my kids ask is what horse is Mike, Joe, Chantal and Aaron riding in the race. Yes, a lot of the video is more entertainment than reality, but I think the more educated horse racing fan should be able to enjoy the show for the entertainment aspect and not get too caught up in the theatrics that go into producing a show like Jockeys.

BH 26 Aug 2009 1:05 AM

I watched season one and I thought it was good but season two blows me right off my chair.  I was teary eyed when I saw that red tag out and approaching BullyBully for the claim and then I was happy when John Sadler did not claim that horse because Kristin's heart would of been broken and mine too.

I look forward to Friday nights just to watch this season.

Annie 26 Aug 2009 7:55 AM

I think the same spills over and over again thing is just part of a "canned" lead in sequence for the show, isn't it? I have not seen the series dwell on tragedy as a theme. All communications education programs teach the need for a "hook" or "gambit" to inspire interest in any subject. Maybe they will change that introductory sequence in the future, but the series is not an exercise in ways to induce depression. I am just glad to see a regularly scheduled show bringing horse racing to the general public!

Tim G---I'm happy to see your comment that the show is "fairly realistic". That's validation coming from an insider!

Karen in Texas 26 Aug 2009 10:55 AM

I am an avowed fan of the series and it'd depiction of a jockeys life has to engender respect among sports fans.

However, the "Bully" segment was  not authentic. You don't risk a potential star to a claim just to access the starter allowance ranks. If Kristin thought that much of the horse, she simply would go in a maiden special. That whole proposition was suspensful but unrealistic.

sal 26 Aug 2009 11:12 AM

I, too, am tired of the repeated and epeated and repeated same spills and the really BAD Trevor Denman voiceovers....and I love Trevor! However, that being said, I also know that they're trying to appeal to a new audience and with that, it can't possibly fully be accepted by the REAL horsemen (like me), but to the general public who usually can't tell the difference. So if it makes a few new fans, I'm for it.

winngcolrz 26 Aug 2009 2:54 PM

I think more than anything they're trying to present jockeys et al as human beings and what they go through, their personal lives etc. Humanize the whole racing community a bit. My perspective from what I watched last year and knowing at least a couple of these guys for years, the personal side was pretty accurate. Of course they don't show ALL of the stuff that goes on in the jocks room and they do dramatize some parts of it. My relative who has been best friends of a jocks wife for years has talked about some of the things which go on. Fights between best friends (fist fights) and all the injuries, weight loss tactics, love affairs. Face it, human beings with a dangerous job, being human beings.

I think with the spills they're trying to show that jocks ARE athletes and that yes it's dangerous.

Haven't you guys seen the inside the PBR? The more wrecks they show the higher the ratings.

Tim G 26 Aug 2009 5:04 PM

p.s. although I must admit once or twice I have said 'how cheesey'.

Trevor? Give me Tom Durkin any day. Bad enough in real time, voice overs, all of us KNOW he doesn't call em like that in reality but that's used to help the rank amateur that watches it. APL is very popular with young kids as well as animal lovers.

Tim G 26 Aug 2009 5:07 PM

This is the best show on TV in spite of the quirks...

shuttleworth 26 Aug 2009 6:57 PM

oh, and MAJOR love for Chantel...

shuttleworth 26 Aug 2009 6:58 PM

Hi Steve.  I watched "Jockeys" from it's inception.  Although a great vehicle for the sport, season one's material needs work.  I noticed it was all California based; they need to get the NY area jockeys involved.  A little repetitious and too much interpersonal material but a great effort.  I have said for years that jockeys names have to become familiar with mainstream audiences so this is good for the sport.  Some of it looked contrived but with some work I am sure Season Two

will be even better.  Kudos to Animal Planet for airing it.

HardSpun'sBigFan 26 Aug 2009 7:03 PM

I really enjoyed the drama playing around Bully too.  

But what I'd like to know is how Corey Nakatani could push another rider off a horse and still be riding. The show makes a constant point of the danger to jockeys and how many are killed or injured every year. With all the other negative aspects of the sport being played out in the public eye, do we really want to add this to the list?

Karen D 27 Aug 2009 12:02 PM

I am so definitely NOT a fan of reality shows, but have watched this show from the beginning and enjoy it. It's great advertising for horse racing - it shows what the jockeys have to go through to do what they do and you can tell which ones do it because they love the horses and which ones do it as a job only. The shot I loved the most in this whole series was Kristin leaning her head on Bully's rump while she's talking to Chantal - the trainer trusting the horse & the horse trusting the trainer. The people involved have been outspoken that they want this series to reach people who don't know anything about the sport so maybe they'll get interested and I think it's doing a very good job of that.

Karen in Indiana 27 Aug 2009 1:11 PM

Karen D---I remember Corey Nakatani being suspended and sent to anger management classes in the past. I, too, am wondering why there are not further consequences.

Karen in Texas 27 Aug 2009 4:55 PM

Been away for awhile living it up in the world of barrel racing with my 10 year old daughter. I sure have missed you guys..... My 2 cents on this show...I have watched it a handful of times and hated it and thought it was not good for this industry. Maybe I need to give it another chance but like most reality shows, I could do without the staged, fake drama. I think its a cheesy attempt to draw people into the sport.

Karen2 27 Aug 2009 6:03 PM

I, too, am excited for the new season and wish the re-calls were gone.  Sadly I was moving this past week and couldn't catch it. Glad to hear it went well and I hope they don't shelve the re-runs of episodes after the week we first see them. I'd love it if they'd re-air the show more than just into the wee hours Saturday.  Maybe before some race (on another network so that would maybe be an issue I guess) they could run the show, then an ad could be shown so anybody just getting into it can go 'oh it's coming on in just a bit, I'll go watch the Travers' after which they put it on ESPN, NBC, whatever.  I think it'd benefit new fans especially, and we might get more of them if the reviews of the series are any indication. It would also promote good and proper race calls being included if they heard more of them, refusing to settle for what we have now.

Kate 27 Aug 2009 6:38 PM

Better start this season.  

I would like to see more factual details around racing, but I am glad its on again.

Almost any show with horses is fine with me.

This could be a great series if only they wouldn't feel the need to stage so much and kept to historical facts.

Freetex 27 Aug 2009 9:09 PM

Guys, c'mon. You complain when racing isn't on TV, you complain when it is. Hollywood is littered with people who think they can do it better than the people already successful at it.

"Jockeys" is a TV show on a cable network that caters primarily to animal lovers. The producers and directors are not aiming the show at racing insiders, they are aiming it at the same families who like to watch "Dogs 101," "Animal Cops: Houston" (and all the other humane cops shows), "Housecat Housecalls," Shark Week, "Whale Wars," and "Venom ER."

Can you tell Animal Planet gets a lot of action at our house?

The spills you are complaining about are in the opening sequence of the show -- just like every other TV show has an opening sequence/song/whatever; the spills are not "repeated over and over" within the body of the show. Yes, the voiceovers are annoying, but again, it's a device to keep informed the average viewer who wouldn't know a chestnut from a gray, a pair of yellow silks with white checks from one with white squares, or have a clue about which jock was under which helmet on which horse.

Expecting "Jockeys" to be geared for the approval of hard-core racing insiders is like expecting "ER" or "House" to be realistic depictions of a hospital.

Jill 28 Aug 2009 2:21 PM

Thanks to season 1, my husband can't stand Joe Talamo and roots for any horse Ms. Sutherland rides.

I enjoy it.

flyte 28 Aug 2009 6:24 PM

I watched Jockeys first season and it was pretty good. But wow it was great last week. I was a wreck with Bully thinking they were going to lose him. It's a pleasure watching Chantal. She's beautiful and talented. Can't wait to find out what's new with her and Mike Smith. And Cory...what can you say about a bad boy! You want to smack them across the face one minute and the next you're wondering what makes them act out the way they do and wondering if they just need a hug. I can't wait for the next episodes especially the I Want Revenge situation. If I felt like crying on that KD morning when he was scratched, I can imagine how his jockey felt.

Ida Lee 28 Aug 2009 6:45 PM

Season one was pretty cheesey but hey, if it brings in the fans...I watched the episode mentioned in the column only because some "non fan" friends had seen it and had questions for me.  I was pleasantly surprised at the improvements over season one.  Sure, they take some liberties to make it more entertaining but who the hell cares as long as it's interesting to the non hard-core. Corey was sure being Corey wasn't he?

TomasinNM 29 Aug 2009 12:18 AM

I caught episode 2 last night- first time watching.  For a reality show, not half bad. I could tell the race calls were recorded specifically for the show, (and funny hearing a Trevor Denman "call" for the New York Gotham and Wood- I imagine that's cheaper than getting rights to Tom Durkin's voice), and some of the scenes were pretty obviously staged (most jockeys aren't actors, that's for sure), but it really was fun and makes the sport accessible.  Yes, as a NY racing fan it'd be fun to see the NY tracks followed, but filming is much more expensive in New York than in California so I'm not holding my breath.  But who knows, if the series lasts, maybe we'll see a season of Jockeys: Saratoga. :)

NIcole 29 Aug 2009 2:47 PM

I love the show, but they way over exaggerate the drama. For regular fans this falls short because we already know what happens later.

Example - they make it seem as if Aaron Gryder's entire career hung on the results of the Dubai race. He won impressively but the horse couldn't run back to that race and AG is pretty much where he was before. Also if Iggy was ever in the top ten before his injury, I sure as hell don't remember.

I don't think it helps create new fans if they are made to think that Trevor Denman calls every race in the planet and that he calls by the jockey's name instead of by the horse.

The drama is just as great if it is played like it is.

Mister K 29 Aug 2009 11:30 PM

Fake voiceover race calls, highly overdramatized nonsense and hype. Would rather see a documentary where the cameras are allowed to roll without the inane background narration, especially in the jocks room or where the trainers are giving the jockeys pre-race instructions. Just cut the chessy narration from Animal planet narrator who clearly doesn't know beans about racing. Portraying laid back, amiable, witty Bob Baffert as "ruthless. " Come on. A show with the potential to be interesting if the staging and hapless narration was highly minimized and the stories allowed to tell themselves. Iggy would be better off filmed with a shirt on. He will come back following injuries or go elsewhere to ride as will Corey given time. Show portrays them as on the edge of riding oblivion in exaggerated melodramatic story lines. Too much like WWE wrestling story-line nonsense thanks to Animal Planet.

Will W 30 Aug 2009 1:09 AM

Why doesn't Chip Wooley hire Chantal to be MTB regular rider??

I don't want to here him whining about MTB not being ridden to his full potential!

Ofelia 31 Aug 2009 2:33 PM

I don't find Trevor's voice-overs annoying in the least. I think you have to look at him from a non-racing fan viewpoint; it has to be made a little easier for "Joe Public" to follow along. On the TV show, the races are set up for the riders stories--the horses names are usually mentioned in passing (exept for the big races, like last week's DWC coverage). Since the focus is on the men and women out there riding, it makes sense (to me) to have a little "do-over" of the original race call for viewers to follow along. IMO, it's a smart move, making it more "user friendly" for the average viewer. The original race call is going to name the horse(s) on the wire, and the "untrained" viewer may be be asking, "But...was that the horse Joe was on, did he win, or what??"...anyway, just my .02 on the matter, I think it works.

LavasLegend 31 Aug 2009 4:57 PM

"And, OK, I understand why Bullybullybully (who I wonder where he is now??) had to go in MCL to make the starter allowance condition, but why did he have to go in starter allowance to then go in stakes races, as the narrative claimed? Is this a condition for some of the Cal Cup races or something?"

Kyri 25 Aug 2009 3:22 PM

Kyri,

For what it's worth, BBB's actual record is 3-1-1-0

1/29/09 SA 1st Maiden Claiming

6/14/09  HOL 2nd Starter Allowance

7/11/09 HOL 4th Starter Allowance

Tyler Baze rode him the last two times.

yawn 31 Aug 2009 4:58 PM

Have enjoyed Jockeys since it's inception.  Although it does seem like some of the scenes are "re-edited", maybe to make it more exciting.  Finally, a show that lets the rest of the sports world know that these jockeys are some of the best athletes ever!!! I'd like to see Shaq or MJ try to  compete with them couldn't do it. The ever constant weight battle over the urge to eat all the while maintaining enough muscle to control a 1000lb+ animal boggles my mind.  Kudos to Animal Planet and the Jockey colony for allowing all of us an inside peek.  

Robin 31 Aug 2009 8:49 PM

I enjoy the show and have been a casual race fan since I was 10 years old watching Secretariat run.  I agree with Tim G and Jill.  The show is not produced for racing insiders but for average viewers who love animals.

People need to relax and realize that any positive publicity that horse racing gets is a bonus for the sport.  I think that getting to see the jockeys behind the scenes is great.  It is a side of racing that I not seen before this series.

I have been totally entertained and a little distressed watching the jockeys work to get rides. Seeing how difficult it is to get on the good mounts and how easily you can lose them.  I have always loved horses but watching the human drama behind the scenes has me watching more racing than ever before.  It also has me logging into bloodhorse.com every day :). If it has that effect on other viewers it should be a great thing for the sport.

Julie 04 Oct 2009 9:57 PM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)

Final Turn

Click Here to download BloodHorse.com Widgets!