BloodHorse.com

Search Blood-Horse.com

Another Slap in the Face to Our Equine Stars

Courtesy of Becky Johnston

California steward Tom Ward thinks the racing public is too sensitive right now, because of Jeremy Rose's "accidental" striking of a horse across the face with his whip repeatedly. 

So I guess, we should just give Garrett Gomez a pass because he admittedly hit his filly across the mouth Sunday, after her race.  Seems like six in one hand and a half dozen in the other.

The filly Eissoai, belonging to trainer Bobby Frankel and owner Patricia Bozano, was making her sixth career start, but her first in this country after winning two of her first  five races in Brazil.

The filly was racing at the back of the field of six in Sunday's third race at Del Mar, a mile and a sixteenth allowance event.  She was traveling very well for Gomez down the backside saving ground on the rail, nice and straight.  

Coming through the final turn heading for the stretch, the filly was moving at a quickened pace.  Gomez reaches around and hits her left-handed with the whip while still in the turn.  The filly that was moving like a winner is suddenly startled and her series of calamities begin with a swishing of her tail.  Gomez appears to be in full panic mode with his rein action and reaction.  It was a mess, both jockey and horse.  

Here is where the controversy begins.  After the wire, Gomez says he's still having trouble with the filly.  Over a hundred yards past the wire he slaps the lightly-raced filly across the left side of her face, the mouth to be specific, with his riding crop.  The public has seen it and the complaints start rolling in.

Stewards Scott Chaney, Tom Ward and Randy Winick, have allowed some rough riding this meet, so their in-action probably shouldn't be a surprise. 

But I am surprised. One wonders if Mr. Ward has his own set of rules.  The CHRB rules state:. 

Rule Number 1688 - Use of Whips

(b) Although the use of a whip is not required, any jockey who uses a whip is prohibited from whipping a horse: (1) on the head, flanks, or on any part of its body other than the shoulders or hind quarters

I realize that you can use the whip to control your horse in the post parade and after the wire, but nowhere does it negate this rule, that you cannot hit the horse in the head or flanks.

In the DRF.com report, Ward said to Gomez "You were just a passenger in this race, weren't you?" 

In court, I believe they call that leading the witness.

If you cannot ride a horse without cruelty, don't do it.  Mr. Gomez states that he was too weak so his only option was to strike her across the face.  I wonder how surprised he would have been had she thrown him off at that point.  I credit the filly for having more consideration for him than he did for her.

My take on this, is that it is a cut and dry violation of the rules.  You do not whip a horse across their face.  The rules are in place to be enforced.  Mr. Gomez' actions could have resulted in injury to the filly or caused her to take evasive action and injuring other jockeys and their mounts.   After all, this isn't the first horse that Mr. Gomez has lost his temper with and struck across the face.  I doubt it will be his last.

November 11, 2005 Gomez was riding the gray gelding Wildberry Road in the first race at Hollywood Park.  The #7 Thunder Maker swung out and bumps Gomez' mount turning into the stretch causing Wildberry Road to be thrown offstride  to the right.  The head-on shot transitions on the bump, but you can clearly see it on the pan view.  After Gomez gets the gelding eased up and given at least nine strides past the point where he was forced out, the jockey's anger overcomes him.  Gomez raises his whip and twice strikes the horse viciously right-handed across the face causing the horse to wince with each blow.

(You can see this race at calracing.com by date 11/11/2005 Hollywood Park Race 1)

This incident was reported to the CHRB at that time and to my knowledge Mr. Gomez was given another lollipop meeting and sent home..

If the stewards feel so comfortable with his actions on July 27, 2008 let's see the video.  The occurrence has been conveniently cut from any replays, either the head-on angle or pan views of the race.  Let's see the video and let the public come to their own conclusion about the events.

Richard Shapiro and the CHRB have made big waves about taking care of these animals, by putting in safer surfaces and banning steroids, and penalizing trainers that administer illegal medications with a 60-second penalty.  If they can somehow excuse this one with no punishment, how do you excuse both of these incidents?

44 Comments:

You are out of your mind if you think that filly wasn't completely out of control on Sunday.  She was lugging in as badly as a horse can and clipped heels as he ducked to the inside - Garrett used the LEFT handed whip and had both hands on the outside rein to try to control her and keep her on the outside.  Your lack of knowledge screams loudly here.  And if I had any doubt about that I only need to look at your reference to the "clubhouse turn" when it was the far turn into the stretch.  The clubhouse turn is the one to the right of the finish line, typically the "first turn."  I understand your concern about Gomez striking the filly in the face.  But I do not understand your lack of comprehension that he was on an out of control wild horse.  Have you EVER ridden a horse?

barbara 29 Jul 2008 2:28 PM

Garret was protecting himself from harm,as the filly was unruly and may have done something to endanger a human being, Garret Gomez.

Becky, this is part of racing on very RARE occasion. Animal loons should try a petting zoo and stay away from the racetrack where BILLIONS are being invested, gambled.It gets a bit rough from time to time.

Mike

mike 29 Jul 2008 2:35 PM

I think it's time for the public to weigh in on this particular issue and others referenced in your blog. I suggest an e-mail campaign to CHRB.

I am disgusted and disbelieving with the excuse given by Mr. Gomez that he was "too weak" after the race and that's why he hit the filly in the mouth.

I love to watch racing but I am sickened when watching race replays on HRtv, etc., and I see jockeys (looking like monkeys) frantically beating the 'stuffing' out of their mounts; especially those jockeys who clearly are not going finish in the money.  Yes, I know they are paid for winning not losing, but someone has to draw the line. There is no point in beating a horse that is trying but can't do better.  They are not all superstars.

The public is going to be ever more sensitive to the plight of racehorses after Barbaro and Eight Belles.  CHRB....how do you want the sport in California showcased??

Katherine

Katherine 29 Jul 2008 2:38 PM

PER CALRACING.COM That was A DIFFERENT JOCK on the horse WILDBERRY ROAD - NOT GOMEZ on 11/11/05!!!  Gomez was riding the 3rd place finisher.  My lord, if you are going to accuse a jock of cruelty to a horse GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT!

barbara 29 Jul 2008 2:44 PM

So you'd rather he just let a terrible accident happen?

And she wasn't suddenly startled, her head was sideways the whole race as he tried to keep her out of the infield.  You may want to watch that replay again, if you even watched it in the first place.  It was a very dangerous situation and he did what he had to to prevent something worse from happening.  

Anybody riding a dangerous, unresponsive horse in that situation would have done the same.

Johanna 29 Jul 2008 2:48 PM

Ms.Johnston...Just two questions regarding your piece please.. The flagrant whip incident speaks for itself..You note and I quote."coming through the clubhouse turn heading for the stretch"..now does Del Mar have two clubhouse turns..the traditional one is the first turn...the actual clubhouse turn..the one you are referring to is the far turn or the top of the stretch...kindly elaborate..and secondly..you note that "he was too weak and his only option was to strike her on the face"..am I to believe that Mr. Gomez was too weak..tired..exhausted..fatigued to even ride and w/an remark and admission such as that...why was he even permitted to ride..was he ill?..was this reported to the stewards prior to the race?..this type of behavior is just if not more indefensible to racing..the safety of the other riders and the public..not to mention the animal than the whip incident...Any rationale explanations folks...Do these people look the other way? We need an wakeup call somewhere..Its long overdue and its no wonder that the sport is in the trouble its in.....Poll the fans and elicit their response..thank you always for the window..Steve Stone..East Hanover..New Jersey..

STEVE STONE 29 Jul 2008 2:57 PM

Calracing has the numbers and names confused due to a scratch.  Here is the past performance line from Equineline and you will see that Garrett Gomez WAS the jockey Barbara.  The trainer was Nic Hines.

111105  1HOL  ft  7f    STR 25.4k  2211  4502  1:2364   3  4  1hd  2hd  55  618¼  GomezGK  122  BL   4.60     56 ThunderMaker¾,HighZ¾,Vermeil2¼    wkned,pulling up late  $400  

Becky Johnston 29 Jul 2008 2:58 PM

You've accused Rose of striking his mount "repeatedly" across the face.  I saw the race...watched the replay...and watched the video via the internet.  He struck her once.  He was pinned on the rail and unable to move his arm out.  He had to keep her from leaning on the fence.  From the reactions I've read and the suspension he received, you'd think he was the son of Barabbas, not just a rider trying to control his horse.

But you're right about the dichotomy of the stewards regarding this incident and other incidents regardless of the jockey involved.

Sharon 29 Jul 2008 3:01 PM

I watched the race replay, but do not have access to the gallop out, so I don't know what happened. But the filly was not traveling straight through the whole race (she wasn't veering in or out but she had her head up and to the side and she was trailing, clearly unhappy about something). Gomez smacked her on her quarters on the turn and she didn't shy AWAY from the whip, like you suggest. She ducked into the whip (which leads me to believe she would have ducked in even if he didn't use the whip) and almost clipped heels with another horse. Then Gomez looked like he was doing everything possible to keep her from veering in even more and bumping with the horse along the rail.

Unlike with Rose's horse, who was traveling straight and just tiring, Gomez's horse looked plain out of control. She was not heeding his guidance of the rein, and Gomez probably did panic - I've been on a horse that was completely out of control and not listening to my seat, leg, or hand cues and it's scary (I wasn't on a racehorse going at the speed Gomez and his horse were, and was able to stop my horse by aiming at the indoor arena wall - not an option for Gomez).

Gomez said he hit the bit ring, not her mouth, and she was not found to have any lacerations after the race.

While I'm not the biggest fan of the whip, I don't believe it should be banned completely (though maybe there should be a rule in place where if a jockey misuses the whip a certain amount of times, he/she will no longer be allowed to ride with one). Nor do I believe this situation with Gomez is the same as the recent one with Rose.

Leah 29 Jul 2008 3:01 PM

Barbara, you're right on the clubhouse turn I had described the race further and had condensed it and failed to change the term.  

Becky Johnston 29 Jul 2008 3:02 PM

Did anyone actually see the race or are we speculating on what we are hearing? PS GG is a fave jock of mine, but the comments "too weak" kind of rang strange to me...

Rachel 29 Jul 2008 3:08 PM

I assume all of you questioning his statement that he was exhausted have never ridden a horse before, much less an extremely rank or out of control one.

Johanna 29 Jul 2008 3:21 PM

Go to the Del Mar site and watch the replay of the race..this mare did nothing we haven't seen...man, reading the interview from the stewards I thought I was going to see a rodeo, instead this mare ran ok, her head turned to the outside but she's on the rail, he's sitting motionless on her, until the final turn, it looks like Gomez overcompensates for her wanting to run out on the turn (he was angling her out to go, like 4 wide) and then she lugs in to the left and runs up the heels of the horse in front and gets totally out of communication with Gomez...which is HIS fault, not hers. (kind of like BB in the Belmont fiasco)

If he hit her for that after the wire (you can't see the gallop out) then he is a rat. He's not some rookie rider, he's the elite of the elite..

PS I do ride, many disciplines, plus am former exercise gal, groom, hotwalker, broke horses to ride, you name it.

Rachel 29 Jul 2008 3:28 PM

Furthermore, to insinuate that the incident has been "conveniently cut" from replays is sheer paranoia.  Gallop-outs are always cut from calracing videos after a second or two.

Johanna 29 Jul 2008 3:48 PM

Seriously?? per your own source GOMEZ rode ARE YOU LOOKIN for Nick Hines to a 4th place finish in race 1 on 11/11/05 at HWP.

If calracing is so mistaken about which horse - please post the entire chart of the race or PP line for the horse.  Your PP line does not even have the horse's name.

But I take it you get your info from the trash talking Hines?

barbara 29 Jul 2008 3:54 PM

Let's call a spade a spade! Regardless of a their behavior during a race or off the track, no horse should be struck in the face ever by its jockey!  The stewards at any race track in the country who let a jockey get away with such cruelty should be severely reprimanded, suspended and required to seek counseling if he wants to continue riding.  Owners should refuse to put him on their thoroughbreds, or boycott him!

Nancy

Nancy Petrillo 29 Jul 2008 4:11 PM

I'll bet to win he'd never hit a grade 1 horse in the face, after the wire, because it was hard to race and he was tired.

Rachel 29 Jul 2008 4:26 PM

I did not see the incident at issue.  However, over the many, many years that I've been around this game, I've cringed every time I saw a horse 4 or 5 lengths, or more, in front at the 1/16th pole and its jockey is banging away on it.  It is so senseless that it defies explanation.  But, seldom, if ever, is anything done about it.

Richard R 29 Jul 2008 4:39 PM

So it would have been less of a "cruelty" to let the filly take out another horse on her way to the infield?  Get real.  Sometimes the reins don't cut it.  

Johanna 29 Jul 2008 5:04 PM

Barbara, I referred you to calracing for the video only.  My source was my own two eyes as I watched this race because I had wagered on this horse and then watched the replay over and over.  I conversed with a representative of the CHRB within hours of this race.  I don't know Nic Hines and have no knowledge of his "trash talking".

The DRF shows this at the order of the horses going to post with riders:

Class:  40000 [3U,NW2L] Purse: $25,000 Distance: 7 Furlongs

P# PP

2 1 Woodlands Ruler (CA)Farina T 122

3 2 High Z (CA) Castanon A L 122

4 3 Wildberry Road (CA) Gomez G K 122

5 4 Are You Lookn (KY) Nakatani C S 124

6 5 Vermeil (KY)Court J K 124

7 6 Thunder Maker (KY) Valdivia, Jr. J 122

Equibase says this of their results for that day

HOLLYWOOD PARK - November11, 2005- Race 1

STARTER ALLOWANCE - For Thoroughbred Three Year Old and Upward (NW2 L) Claiming Price: $40,000 - $0

Seven Furlongs On The Dirt

Purse: $25,000

Plus: $3,000 CBOIF - California Bred Owner Fund

Plus: $400 Other Sources

Available Money: $28,400

Value of Race: $25,400 1st $15,000, 2nd $5,000, 3rd $3,000, 4th $1,500, 5th $500, 6th $400

Weather: Clear Track: Fast

Off at: 7:08 Start: Good for all

EQUIBASE

Video Race Replay

Pgm Horse Name (Jockey)

7 Thunder Maker (Valdivia, Jr., Jose)

3 High Z (Castanon, Antonio)

6 Vermeil (Court, Jon>

5 Are You Loolcn (Nakatani, Corey)

2 Woodlands Ruler (Farina, Tony)

4 Wildberry Road (Gomez, Garrett)

I've already posted the running line from Equineline and the sixth place horse.  If you would like to purchase the three reports that I have already purchased that cannot be reposted due to copyright issues please do so.  All say Garrett Gomez was riding this horse as I did.

Becky Johnston 29 Jul 2008 5:41 PM

Haven't seen the race but have read a couple of descriptions, including the jock's explanation to the stewards. Here's my question. Why was such a poorly schooled filly racing? I know she's fresh from Argentina, but I'm thinking she didn't step off the plane onto the track. Didn't they have some idea about her?

Tiznowbaby 29 Jul 2008 5:50 PM

I suggest everyone watches the head-on shot of the race at Calracing.com.  That definitely shows how unruly she was from the start of the race and onto near the wire.  Furthermore, and unfortunately, I watched it over and over again, Garret Gomez hit her twice near in the aforementioned area of concern, and her nose jerked to her left after the second strike.  He tried to swerve her out to the grandstand side so that other horses could pass without incident, and she started to throw her head right at the wire.  Now, I'm not merely picking sides; what I've justed stated is pure observation from what Calracing.com could provide me, even with the lack of actually witnessing or experiencing the incident myself.  Garret Gomez WAS straining to keep her under control, and from experience on riding unruly horses that practically jumped at everything, it's quite an exhausting feat in the shortest amount of time.  I don't excuse him for raising the whip near her head, but he did run out of options when nothing else seemed to work.  With that said, let me continue further...Here are a series of questions for everyone to try and answer me:  why now?  Why the stewards suddenly coming forth after about THREE YEARS of that happening?  Why did it take so long for them to step forth?  Is it because Garret Gomez was the leading jockey last year and is continuosly being one of the top jockies this year, and they "want" something?  It just doesn't make sense...I wonder what's REALLY behind the truth of their taking so darn long to actually show how much they are the so-called fair and balanced "judges" of the sport.  If something like that happens, it should be reported immediately, not three or more years after the fact when the past is in the past and no one knew anything about it.  Of course, it should be brought into light, but after the Jeremy Rose incident and after such a friggin' long time?  How incompetent and unprofessional is that?  Now, that's messed up...With their inability to act accordingly to their stewardly duties and responsibilities, it makes me not trust their ability to oversee the races and the safety of the horses and jockies involved.

By the way, the horse's name is ARE YOU LOOKIN and the trainer is N. HINES.

Maggie 29 Jul 2008 6:19 PM

Scratch what I just said about what the horse's name was and watnot.  The PGM numbers and the PP numbers are all confusing.  I understand most of it, by why the heck do they need different numbers?  It's stupid...It's not only confusing to a new fan/ bettor of the sport, but it's downright ridiculous to follow when trying to connect a #3 PGM horse with it being a #6 PP, especially when Calracing or other notable resources for entries/ results mess up the details of the triners and jockies involved with the horses that ran in that particular race.

Maggie 29 Jul 2008 6:24 PM

At calracing.com, #1 scratched but they didn't scratch the jockey!

The jockey listing is off by 1.

Pat Valenzuela was not in the race right?  Calracing.com made the mistake.  

Take out P Val and move the jockeys up one, and you get the correct rider on the correct horse.  Gomez was on the #4.  

#4 gets hit well after the horse has faded, before the finish.  The horse has a white mask on and he does flinch...wow pretty sad!  

Jen 29 Jul 2008 6:56 PM

the general public isn't going to understand "She was unruly so it's OK that he smacked her on the face."

They're going to hear "he smacked her in the face."

If a horse isn't suited to race and causes danger to it's self and to the other horses in the race, much less the spectators, then maybe it shouldn't be racing? You wouldn't set a RACECAR out on the track with brakes that don't function, would you?

Regardless of WHO is riding and HOW the horse is behaving, HITTING IT IN THE FACE isn't going to make it behave better, yo. I mean people here are questioning the author's experience on horseback. To that, I question theirs!

Ever whipped a horse in the face? I admit I've never been stupid enough to hit a horse in the face. If you hit the horse in the face, that horse is gonna get p'oed. He probably put himself in MORE danger by doing that. There were other courses of action that he could've taken.

It's interesting that everyone came down so hard on Rose for something he did on accident

but forgive this rider for something he admits he did on purpose.

This rider did nothing to further the sport or help the case of the whip. I have a hard time defending the whip when someone goes and pulls something like this.

Make up your minds, people.

jj 29 Jul 2008 7:52 PM

Yes, I have ridden rank horses, and no it NEVER occurred to me that it would serve any purpose to strike one in the face. What purpose does it serve? As a lesson? Please!

As an equine therapist, the first consideration given to a rank horse who is acting out of character is a PAIN ISSUE. All the face beating in the world is not going to quiet the animal if it is in distress.

Hitting a horse in the face on purpose should be used only as a last resort to defend yourself from an animal that is trying to crush you. That is only applicable if you are on the ground. There just is no excuse for GG's behavior. That kind of incident would be more common from a third rate jockey on a backwater track, not at the showcase, boutique track, Del Mar. Not very professional.

goodwin 29 Jul 2008 9:21 PM

Becky, yes I went and found the chart.  You could note the calracing.com entry discrepancy in your blog about the horse that you bet on in 05 that Gomez rode to a last place finish and indeed looks guilty of hitting in the head?  And that possible guilt for a ride from 3 years ago does not make him guilty this past Sunday.  

jj - You think what Rose did was an "accident"?  Have you seen that video? At least Garrett really was honest.

As for Gomez's actions on the wild filly on Sunday at Del Mar - I agree that smacking a horse in the face is rarely helpful - but I can see why he would be at a loss as to how else to get her attention long enough to stop her from lugging in - even on the gallop out with other horses still at risk due to her unruly behavior.   The stewards, even in these sensitive times, thought that the filly was acting in an unsafe manner so they gave Gomez the benefit of the doubt.

barbara 29 Jul 2008 9:21 PM

JJ  I'll agree with everything you said.. but Rose did nothing 'by accident.'  Watch the race.

However, the issue is this incident, and a horseman never strikes a horse across the face and teaches it anything but fear and resentment.  Disgusting that we have this issue again. I'm sort of shocked that some 'riders' on here find such punishment an acceptable training tool.

tbpartnerperson43 29 Jul 2008 9:22 PM

The rules seem fairly clear - the jockey cannot hit the horse in the face with the whip.  The rules don't say it's ok to whip the horse in the face as long as the rider has a good reason to do so.  I can't believe that GG is such an inexperienced rider that he had no other option but to break the rules and smack the horse in the face.  I'm sure this was not the most fractious animal he's ever ridden.

Amanda 29 Jul 2008 10:10 PM

It's not acceptable. I saw the race and she was a mess, but it's STILL not acceptable to hit a horse in the face. NO EXCUSE and GoGo needs to pay up and sit out for a while and think about it.

Times have changed.

You can talk old school all you want, but the public is tired of this crap. If you want racing to stop its downward spiral, we need reform. Even if you don't care about the horses (and some of you really don't seem to), your fun and  games are OVER if the public completely turns against racing. (And it's pretty close to doing so now.)

Heather Benjamin 29 Jul 2008 10:29 PM

I've ridden for quite a few years.  And I ask everybody: how would you have dealt with the situation?  The filly was perfectly fine afterwards.  Had he not gotten her attention, who knows if that would still be the case.  After the race, she was in the middle of a pack of horses and still trying to lug in.  Would you all rather read a blog about a three-horse pileup at Del Mar?  Jockeys can't use their legs, and if the horse isn't responding to the reins, what else are they supposed to do?  

Johanna 29 Jul 2008 10:52 PM

I've watched Rose's video a couple times. I guess maybe I just haven't watched the HD version everyone else has seen. I saw him hit the horse in the face but other than the obvious reaction the horse had it was hard to see Rose's actions (before or after).

I know that jockeys sometimes throw the whip up to show the horse it's there. Not close to it's face, not intending to hit it. Or even in a separate situation where they're reaching forward before whipping the back end;

Therefore I'm also of the opinion that with the 100 thousand different things that happen during a race - he could have easily accidentally done it. Reached too far forwards or changed his footing in the stirrups.

The owner and trainer were on Rose's side for heaven's sake and that seems like it ought to count for something.

jj 29 Jul 2008 11:07 PM

At Jeremy Rose's appeal there were a few "facts" that came out. When watching the video frame by frame it was PROVEN that the horse was hit once on the face.  It was also proven that the angle that he struck was the same as when he hit the shoulder.  It was a careless accident. Another fact was he did volunteer that he thought he had hit the mare before the stewards were involved. The most important fact was the mare's eye had dramatically improved in 24hrs from the impact and was allowed to go home the next day, however because of the frenzy from the media,she was kept 3 more days. She was allowed to race w/in a week from it happening.

The eye was fine and it had been a minor injury.

The trainer chose not to race her from fear of more bad publicity from the media.

The stewards were proven wrong- he had hit the mare only once.

Both Rose and Gomez are professionals, neither would hit a horse in the face intentionally, however they have a split second to make decisions at 35mph on a saddle the size of a bicycle seat on horses that most times have very little steering.  Both horses were reported as lugging in. Rose's had almost clipped heels w/ another horse (one of the most dangerous incidents that can happen to a jock) and was near a section on the track that had no rail.  

It's easy to second guess when you were not in either's shoes at the time. It's even easier to judge when you have never put a leg over a horse.  

They are beautiful, wonderful creatures, that can also can be very dangerous especially while racing.

The good jocks like Gomez and Rose will pay for this a long time and hopefully be more careful.

Unfortunately trying to sacrifice two good jocks for mistakes or poor judgement will not change the many breakdowns at the cheap tracks that no one finds important to write about.

bossmare 30 Jul 2008 7:59 AM

Bossmare, you can say what you want about the Rose situation but Rose's arm moved that whip forward more than once.  But no matter, it seems that all was ok because he didn't actually blind the mare.  

You had one good point though.  Most race horses don't STEER.  I was recently at a well known training track and went into the tack shop on the grounds.  There were all these 5 1/2" bits hanging on the display board, and I wondered if there were enough warm bloods ponying horses to use them all.  Does anyone know how to bit a horse so the bits do what they are designed to do?  Look at picture after picture of running horses and you see inches of bit out of the sides of their mouths.  In  GG's defense, if he was pulling right, the bit probably had slid so far that the joint was pinching the mares lips on the right side and she lugged away from the pinching.   Just an added bit of pain, and confusion,  and a big problem for the jockey.  About all you can do in that case, is crack the left shoulder and ease up on the reins till you can get the bit back in the mouth.  It's a shame  that the majority of trainers I've observed don't put the right width bits on their horses.  It's also a shame that the same bridle goes with a rider in the morning, one time on a two year old, one time on an older horse,  maybe even the same bit when backing a colt or filly.  You have to wonder if they even adjust the cheeks.  So, that's one thing that has been on my mind, even watching my partnership horses being started.  Maybe a probably bitted horse wouldn't need much whip at all.

tbpartnerperson43 30 Jul 2008 11:25 AM

I appreciate the moderator will not allow this comment to be published,but I shall write it.

A bouquet to Becky Johnston for her report and analysis of the incident.

I was an apprentice jockey more than sixty years ago.  So I know something about horseriding and raceriding. I've been on all manner of horses, good, bad and dangerous.  I learned that while a few good cracks of a whip may teach a horse while it is being educated, flogging a horse in a race (or right after it) is just unnecessary cruelty.

Gomez hit the filly while still on the rail. Why?  He could have eased her to the outside to make his run.  She was trying to run on, so she resented a blow and swished her tail to show her annoyance.  It also confused her and that began the mess.  Ultimately, Gomez took revenge by hitting her along the head.  Disgraceful behavior by a highly-paid professional.

However, the inaction of the stewards is inexcusable.  They should be dismissed.

The cruelty of flogging goes on all the time.  It revolts ordinary, sensible people: the kind we want at the races.  Flogging people, for any crime, was abolished years ago. Isn't it time to abolish flogging horses?

Garrett Redmond 30 Jul 2008 11:29 AM

tb,

For the record.....

I heard all the testimony and saw the frame by frame of the race, he swung his arm out from the side to hit on the point of the shoulder, he uses a wide swing unlike most other jocks who use a straight down movement. He is to get schooled on his technique as part of his penalty.

It was agreed by the majority of commissioners that it was an accident.. All three hits were the same angle unfortunately the one hit the eye, the other two the shoulder. The bottom line it shouldn't have happened from a jockey of this caliber but it did and unfortunately it happens alot more at tracks than  is reported.

What wasn't in the media...

The vet records stated the injury was superficial and was treated with only ointment.( a broken blood vessel, no lacerations) Rose was one of the only  jocks at the track that was using the "peta certified whip" that had a wide foam end.  Rose was not  told at the stewards hearing he was being accused of hitting the horse twice in the face. That came to surface at the appeal.  It was proven the stewards were wrong by the video.

But let's look at  both of these situations....

GG's horse was lugging in, trouble steering, nearly clipped heels, Very similar to Rose's ride other than Delaware park had no rail on part of the track.

Stewards at Delmar try to put out the flames on bad PR for racing.

Delaware racing official orchestrates a bon fire and invites the media to feast on Rose. (perhaps the idea being it would take the microscope off  Delaware park and all would be happy that someone at that track was sacrificed for what happened to Eightbelles.)

Rose accidently hits the horse while going for the win, Gomez hits the horse intentionally after the finish line.

Rose 6 mos suspension reduced to 3 mos suspension & $5000 fine.

Gomez exonerated........

My point is there are no set guidelines for infractions. Both of these were similar w/ very different penalties.

The highest fine ever for hitting a horse on the head previously was $200. Recently Victor Molino kicked a horse in the stomach on tv while unsaddling in the paddock due to it being scratched....30 day suspension/ $1000 fine.  Two years ago a jockey at Delaware Park pulled a knife and held it to another jocks throat, threatening to kill him and another jock. He was taken out in handcuffs....60 day suspension.  

( am I the only one questioning why a hit to the eye of a horse warrants penalty much larger than threatening someone w/a knife???)

.The stewards have all the power. The penalty can be whatever they want it to be.

Three blind stewards make a call that it's excessive whipping then turn around and penalize the same jock  for not using the whip enough because a trainer or owner filed an objection. "Excessive" can be different on any given day along w/ the penalty.

Rose accepted responsibility for what he had done, however the penalty was so far off the chart compared to similar infractions. He was tried and found guilty by reportings that were exxagerated in the media before he had his hearing w/ the stewards.  

Gomez also deserved to be disciplined but those stewards felt he had done nothing wrong.

When was the last time you read about a veternarian at the track being held responsible for a horse breaking a leg while racing.  

Vets send cripples out everyday to get "one more race" out of them. They medicate not to heal but to deaden the pain.  Those are the horses that break down, putting the lives of the jockeys and other animals in jeapordy. Whipping is wrong but jockeys who make mistakes w/ whips are not causing the demise of horses at the track . They are the unfortunates that are expected to get that  win no matter what.

They have to appease the bettor, the trainer, the owner, the stewards and also the public.

Pretty high expectations to put on someone practicing one of most dangerous vocations in the world.

I would love to see the whip banned, but I also know that sometimes they are a necessary evil to save someones life.

Bossmare 30 Jul 2008 10:16 PM

Garrett Redmond ~ I agree wholeheartedly!!

This is unacceptable behavior, I don't care who the Jockey is. These are 2 of my favorite Jocks, but this can not be acceptable behavior. The rule as it stands, WAS broken, and punishment must stand in these cases. If a horse is hit in the face, whether accidental or purposely, there must be penalties. The punishment is a way to deter these incidents from occuring. I don't know how I missed this incident, I don't miss much.... possibly because it didn't get the media "over" coverage that Rose's received. I know I'm going to hear, "but it's 1200 + lbs. of unruly!" BUT, when a child misbehaves, there are other ways to control the situation than smacking, beating or whipping, and the same goes for ANY animal.

It is Unnecessary Cruelity and needs to be further regulated if not banned, and not ignored!

I hate thinking, as I'm reading some of these comments, that some fans would have accepted Desourmeax, whipping Big Brown across the face?? Then maybe you'd not be so hard on him, and Big Brown. If so, I say that's disgraceful.

normajean81258 30 Jul 2008 11:19 PM

You know Garret Gomez is a good rider, but! there are times when they get frustrated just like you and I,if he couldn't handle her ,he should not have been on her,In the Belmont in 2007,he couldn't handle Hard Spun either,but he didn't hit him,he wouldn't have dared!Just because hes a good rider, doesn't mean we should take what he says as gospel.

ruffian518 31 Jul 2008 9:53 AM

So your going to compare the unruliness of a child with that of a 1100 pound out of control horse? Is the brat child a threat to human lives around him? I wish you were on that horse and lets see how you would have handled that problem, maybe you can enlighten us as to how Garrett or any other jocks could control runaways when all the conventional methods are not working and your horse is ready to go over the rail, don't hold out on us, share your expertise in this matter with the jockeys of America!!!!

Lorie 31 Jul 2008 12:05 PM

Quit dumping on the Vets for racing's problems.  Vets do not send out cripples.  Only trainers and owners can and do make such decisions.

A state-employed Vet is responsible for scratching horses that show signs of impairment before a race.  But it is hard to detect an unsound horse while it is being ponied to the gate.  If our horses were freed to canter to the start, many sore horses would be detected.

Also, we can be certain the vet might have some difficulty scratching a BIG trainer's horse.

Garrett Redmond 31 Jul 2008 12:46 PM

Let's play devils advocate. Kent Desermeaux was abused by the public for pulling Big Brown up....... What would have happened if he had gone to using the whip on him and had found out he was indeed hurt??????

The jockey is in a precarious position. They are expected to trust the trainer and vet that their mount is sound enough to be  at a dead run.  If they pull up or don't ride a sore hard, they are scrutinized if lucky or penalized by the stewards.  If the mount is just plain crazy, they are to ride it whether it is dangerous or not.

Yet if a trainer is suspended, his income keeps coming in.  If a jockey is suspended, he has no income.  Example Ricky Dutrow 15 days for the 70th infraction of medication - no loss of income.  Jeremy Rose loss of income for 3 mos. about $225,000. That's a pretty hefty fine.

Do they make mistakes or make bad decisions?  You betcha!  And they should be disciplined.... not crucified or their lives destroyed.

There are much bigger issues that need addressed if racing is going to improve or stay alive.

bossmare 31 Jul 2008 2:32 PM

The Jockey also is assuming the horse he is getting on is capable of running around a track without him having to wrestle and impede other riders, again, I'm Garrett, I'm doing the same damn thing he did, the poor guy was hanging off the saddle and pulling with two hands on one rein, it isn't his job to have to teach a horse how to run around the track, at the end of the day he wants to go home to his family, same as all of us.  I swear there are people who would prefer to read the headline " Jockey killed in racing accident", than horse spanked for being unruly, give me a break!!!!!

Lorie 31 Jul 2008 6:22 PM

Amen Lorie! My point exactly!

I would love to take a few of these people to a large hill w/ 12 others on bicyles, kick off the brakes, keep them in a pack and limit their steering and as an added bonus, give them a crop to swing.(most would fall off if you used a horse) Perhaps they may be a bit less critical.

Garrett,

When was the last time you were on a backside of a track?  Vets are to check every horse that runs for soundness issues.  If you are a horseman, all you have to do is watch some of animals going to the gate, or look at the ankles or tendons to realize they are questionable.  Add that to lameness when trotting out and you have horses that should not run!  Vets at the track do not read previous medical records on the horses they work on. But they still administer meds.They walk to a stall and ask "what are we doing to this horse"

If you ever spoke to a vet from the track and a vet that calls on a show barn, there are different standards as to what is considered servicably sound. The track is much more lenient...and the most dangerous.  Jocks at Delaware Park have refused to ride horses that the vet gave "ok" to race. How many ankles do you think the vets "tap" a week so the pressure from joints w/ little or no synovial fluid left gets released to relieve pain so they can get one more race.

The vets are the only ones who can say yea or nay before they walk on the track. It's not dumping, it's stating a fact. The are there to protect the animal and god forbid....... even the human on his back.

Bossmare 31 Jul 2008 11:06 PM

I'm pro-whipping. You wouldn't get some of our horses in the stalls let alone wining a race without using the whip. 75% of races in the UK are won by horses that get whipped so it proves it works. Obviously there need to be rules and there can be mistakes. But such incidents should not not be used as an excuse to ban the whip. Some horses need whipping.

JOSIM 26 Nov 2008 11:20 AM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)

The Racing Hub

Click Here to download BloodHorse.com Widgets!