BloodHorse.com

Search Blood-Horse.com

If I Hit the Lotto on Tuesday I'll buy TVG and fix racing... You're Welcome

Courtesy of Patrick Patten

I play the lotto not because it is the worst odds imaginable, not because I don't realize it's a "stupid" tax, but it allows me to write these dreams out like I really have a chance.  TVG is up for sale, and the NTRA has always been a fan of the channel.  So why not buy it outright, and do something good with it.  My suggestion:  Fix racing with it.   

I'd buy TVG and then buy every wagering & broadcast signal "exclusively."  Then I'd let every track I bought a signal from buy into TVG and form an LLC.  Getting over the pie-in-the-sky hurdles of winning the lotto, getting cooperation, and having something work in racing, it's not that bad of an idea. 

The basic structure is that the tracks form an LLC to obtain both wagering and televising rights exclusively from themselves (the tracks) and let the LLC sell signals back to everyone based on common interests. 

Assume the blended rate is 20%.  Each party entering the agreement agrees that the LLC will pay members 8% for exclusive gaming and television rights that the LLC can sell.  What each track will pay for a signal from the LLC is left up to the members of the LLC.

How I see it working:

NYRA, Tracknet, Keeneland, Podunk Downs join the LLC.  They are each free to purchase other signals outside the LLC, but anyone purchasing members signals goes through the LLC, including LLC members. 

 

Purchasing Signal:

An ADW platform asks to purchase signal - Flat fee is 14%.  Rebates can be had depending on how many customers they have, and handle wagered, treat them as they treat their customers. 

ADW w/ Television access- Flat fee is 14% Extra rebates can be had if they purchase the exclusive television right (separate from wagering) of certain tracks, they can have that track's signal cheaper.  The wagering rights are separate from the television rights (this fixes the current mess w/ one sentence I'm pretty sure).

Tracks - Flat rate is 12%, the rate can go up or down depending on purses/race, race days, breakdowns/starter, drug policy, whatever they see fit to put here.

Money:  The LLC is for profit.  If the LLC can buy for 8% what it  sells for 11% then the money left over (after an operating budget approved by everyone in the LLC) would be split amongst member tracks based upon last years all source handle and/or some other mechanism. 

 

Weakness & Solution:  Allow tracks of certain size (size can be handled in various ways, but lets just say handle under X dollars) to partner their signal with others so as to create better competition, a quality vs quantity situation.  The LLC does not have complete a la carte pricing where a buyer can pick and choose tracks as they need but a buyer could buy the NYRA, Traknet, invididually and then West Coast (could be GG, PM, Emd) or the Mid-Atlantic group (MTH, PHA, Md) etc.

Trigger the start.  Sing up tracks one by one, but they won't have the contract go into effect until X% of wagering dollars is linked up.  If you get 25% of the tracks on board the other 75% will undercut and win, so pick a target and use that to get everyone on board.  No one left behind. 

 

Strengths: A reason to cooperate.


13 Comments:

I play Lotto ($1.00) every week in hopes of winning enough money to buy more land and open a Thoroughbred Horse Rescue. It disturbs me how many horses are slaughtered every year.  

Patties Critters 06 Oct 2008 10:55 AM

That's a great idea.Keeping TVG around would definitely be a plus for the sport of racing. HRTV pales in comparison. When Churchill switched all of their tracks to HRTV, it was a serious blow to fans who not only wagered, but were just fans of the sport.  Hands down, TVG's anouncers are more informative and enjoyable than HRTV's.  TVG does a better job nationally covering regional racing than HRTV.  HRTV just can't escape the fact they are a Calfornia based racing product. I especially love it when TVG is at Keeneland in the spring.  They know their stuff.

Keenelandcat 06 Oct 2008 12:38 PM

Sorry, Keenelandcat, I beg to differ. I very much enjoy the knowledge that the announcers on HRTV have about the horses, the trainers, the history. But then I don't gamble, I just like the horses. I also enjoy the programs like Inside Information that give more of a behind the scenes look at every aspect of horse racing. Isn't it a good thing to have a choice? Those who are more interested in gambling can go to TVG, those more interested in the sport can go to HRTV.

Karen in Indiana 06 Oct 2008 1:21 PM

was TVG the hub for Arc wagering?  their posted prices showed that Soldier of Fortune finished third and It's Gino finished fourth.  The tri was 329 and the super was 20,000.  In fact, there was a dead heat for third place.  Did those who had It's Gino in the 3rd slot on trifectas (most likely using the "ALL" key) get shafted here?

Weatherbird 06 Oct 2008 2:28 PM

Great idea!  I do wish we could settle this and be able to count on signal.  I would rather watch TVG than HRTV.  I really miss the Derby Works show.  I am not a gambler, but I love the insight.

Jamie in Indiana 06 Oct 2008 3:37 PM

TVG does have the best production and TV talent in this space. But they desperately need to make a change in their existing model because they have a weak menu to offer from Nov to March. AQU is nice, but every other "main" track is the JV - from Turfway, Tampa (which is actually decent), etc.

HRTV, by sheer default, roars to the front of the line at that time of the year because they pick up HWood/Santa Anita, Gulfstream, Oaklawn, Fair Grounds, etc. They show the preponderance of quality 3 year prep races until April when TVG comes out of hibernation to show the Wood, Blue Grass, and Lexington.

Plus, I'm all for something radical to break the current horrendous model because it mistreats the most important element of this sport's success - the betting public. The treatment of their customer base is a case study for Biz Schools of what not to do...

Brian 06 Oct 2008 5:40 PM

As long as there is competition. Strength in having competition is balance, the push to have variety or competing products, change and what not.

aspradling 06 Oct 2008 6:13 PM

Would someone please just merge TVG and HRTV and be done with it. I am a DirecTV subscriber and nobody can adequately explain why Dish has both networks but only TVG is on DirecTV. I want to watch Churchill, Santa Anita and Gulfstream but they have not been made available to DirecTV.

Also, why are both networks so biased towards Cailfornia? Why don't we have an Eastern-based network that will actually focus on Eastern racing. I am sick and tired of heraing about Cali racing. I like TVG but they ignore Saratoga. For them not to even be at Saratoga for one day during the meeting should disqualify them from being called a racing network.

Steve B 06 Oct 2008 6:29 PM

Sorry to Karen in Indianna.  We are a small operation in North Carolina.  There is no wagering or gambling in this state.  We prefer TVG because they provide us the best insight into stallion & breeding information.  More so than HRTV.

keenelandcat 06 Oct 2008 7:07 PM

TVG has the worst announcers of any sport on TV. I wish Directv had HRTV then I would never have to listen to those guys. I prefer to listen to the sound of the TV because it is 2008 not a 1932 silent movie. Hey TVG, do you really need the fake hoof sounds on the track? When I go to SA and stand about 25 yards from the track I can't even hear the hooves hitting the Pro-Ride surface. Who are you fooling? A 4 horse field would never sound like a 20 horse field. TVG is a joke and I am force to watch it with the sound off because horseracing is so unpopular that Directv will not get HRTV and yes I have called Directv numerous times to request they add it to their menu.

Josh 06 Oct 2008 7:45 PM

Maybe you should start by improving the product.  What is the point of having gambling and media distribution to all points of the globe if the product stinks.  How many 5- and 6-horse fields do we have to endure?  Which trainers are using steriods in those states that do not control them?  Why doesn't the NTRA get its member tracks to adopt a uniform medication policy even if the different states won't?  The application of breakage exists today even though all payoff calculations are done by computers and the majority of bets are not settled in cash; but, by voucher or account.  None of these fixes have anything to do with TVG, HRTV, RCS or any of the other hype-mongers that are basically covering up a lousy product.  

Richard R 06 Oct 2008 8:50 PM

don't know about a biscuit on every plate or no one left behine!!!...how about a CAROUSEL @ every track...then we can wtach the FAMILES & young folks come back to the track on your network!!!...Long Live The Carousel of Legends...check out Barrango.com made in Amercia by Amercian HANDS!!!

Bellwether 07 Oct 2008 12:22 AM

Say it ain't so Joe (or Patrick in this case), there you go again thinking rational reasoned thoughts and thinking they'll apply to racing. You've made no accommodation in your plan for ego, greed or mistrust.

C Bea 07 Oct 2008 5:38 AM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)

Thoroughbred Bloggers Alliance

Thoroughbred Bloggers Alliance RSS Feed

Click Here to download BloodHorse.com Widgets!