Symposium Needs Follow-Through - by Tom LaMarra

 (Originally published in the December 17, 2011 issue of The Blood-Horse magazine. Feel free to share your own thoughts and opinions at the bottom of the column.)  

By Tom LaMarra - @JerseyTom on Twitter

The funny thing is the symposium has never been more relevant

Attendance is down. The exhibitor hall is half—maybe even a third—the size it was 10 years ago. There are fewer satellite meetings held by industry organizations. The resort bar isn’t as crowded, and the uncorking of $200 bottles of wine at dinner isn’t as prevalent.

In many ways the University of Arizona Symposium on Racing & Gaming mirrors the horse racing industry. There are fewer patrons, emptier facilities, and much less money spent on expensive meals and entertainment.

But it’s more than that. As one attendee said of this year’s event, held Dec. 5-8 in Tucson: “There seems to be a lack of energy.”


It has nothing to do with the Race Track Industry Program, which organizes and hosts the symposium, or with the students who participate in the program and over the years have landed many jobs in the pari-mutuel racing business. It has everything to do with the economy, malaise, and fear within an industry that has no collective idea what it wants to look like in the next 10 years.

In the same way there are questions about the purpose and role of numerous alphabet soup organizations in a business that is contracting; there is talk of the symposium’s relevance and importance in the industry. The funny thing is the symposium never has been more relevant.

For many years attendance at the event, which was launched in 1974, topped 1,000. This year it was closer to 500.

RTIP director Doug Reed noted, however, that this year visitors from outside the United States made up 21% of attendees, which represents a growing number. Reed said that’s a product of international stakeholders in racing wanting to interact with their North American counterparts, something that hasn’t been easy to do despite repeated calls for international cooperation and uniformity.

And then there are the RTIP students, many of whom are in their early 20s. A major component of the program curriculum is interaction with industry professionals throughout the year and during the symposium.

What seems lost on the industry, however, is the fact that year after year—in the face of seemingly endless negativity and dysfunction—there are young people with a passion for horse racing who actually want to make a living in the business.

That’s priceless.

Joe Harper, president and chief executive officer at Del Mar, said when he got started in racing, he and others “inherited an entrepreneurial business. We were handed a golden egg-laying goose. People were flocking to racetracks. It was a case of, ‘How could we mess this up?’ Well, the golden goose is gone.”

For now it is. But Harper said a positive outlook, an appreciation for the business, and cultivation of young people with new ideas are paramount for the industry’s survival.

The symposium serves another purpose. It’s one of a handful of conferences at which presentations aren’t vetted, speakers can speak their mind, and attendees can ask questions and make challenges. The symposium and these other events offer in-person interaction, a flow of ideas, and yes, controversy at times.

Remember, this is a democracy. Such transparency is needed, but unfortunately in short supply.

If you take a look at coverage of previous RTIP symposiums in The Blood-Horse or through, you’ll shake your head. Major initiatives have been launched at the event, but many unresolved industry issues involving the same players are addressed year after year.

There have been lively discussions and some strong back-and-forth between the audience and panelists over key issues in horse racing. The platform is there. Is it a failing of the symposium that issues never get resolved?

Of course not. If anything, the symposium has been quite effective in delivering a message.

If there have been overriding themes the past 15 years, they are a need for collaboration, integrity, and a putting aside of personal interests and egos. If attendees and the bosses who send them don’t get it, they haven’t been good symposium students.

Hearing is one thing; listening and absorbing are another. How many times does the racing industry need to hear the same thing before it listens and takes action?

The symposium, like horse racing, will never be what it once was. But that doesn’t mean it will be any less important.

It will be leaner, but hopefully meaner. The latter, of course, depends on what the racing industry does to reinvent itself.

The RTIP symposium gets a B-plus for effort. The industry is the one with the D-minus on its report card.

But failing doesn’t always equate to failure. There’s still time left in the semester.


Leave a Comment:


Well put Tom. Humans have a wonderful ability to adapt however, some will insist on pursuing antiquated models until they are forced to change. Case in point, when I interned at Del Mar in 1992 several reporters requested manual typewriters. The secretary in charge turned to me and said, "where am I going to find 20 manual typewriters?" It's 1992 and they had not yet graduated to the electric typewriter - forget about the computer.

You make a wonderful point: young people ARE interested in racing - duh - gambling, drinking, good-looking people and beautiful horses? Who wouldn't love that?

13 Dec 2011 12:06 PM

there is a battle going on now between the contract horse racing crowed that would like to pocket all the profits and most of horse racing that sees power in expansion.  for my part the problem is money and the solution is internet advertising and track owned adws.  they'll figure it out.  eventually.

13 Dec 2011 3:11 PM

Your observations are, unfortunately, wrong, for it has been many years since the Symposium sort of 'jumped the shark' in going from a very useful tool for education and networking... to a commercial affair wherein the hucksters outnumbered the racing officials.

To open it up to "gaming" and the like seemed to sound something of a death knell for the core purpose of the original Symposium.

There are simply far too many people in attendance only to toot their own horns, and far too few actually there with an interest in helping the industry.

I don't know whether the Symposium is having a negative effect on the industry or whether the industry is dragging the Symposium down.

Some of the major "networking" I witnessed by an unnamed racing management sort was their sitting in the small gift shop chatting up the permanent hired help at the venue.

13 Dec 2011 8:13 PM
Dogs Up

The formula is:

All TB industry stake holders must work in concert to generate and achieve new pari-mutuel revenue generating takeout streams and share proceeds proportionately based on their risks.

Unfortunately, to share a $2.00 wager among so many literally competing groups at risk is a question for the times.

14 Dec 2011 5:16 PM

Recent Posts

More Blogs