BloodHorse.com

Search Blood-Horse.com

Keep Pushing for Integrity

Representatives of the Sales Integrity Program Monitoring Committee and the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association have been making the rounds recently, talking to members of the media about the past and future efforts to make public auction transactions involving horses more transparent. It's clear that a lot of thought and debate have gone into the process. But it's also clear there is still more to be done.

 

Here are my thoughts on several steps that should be taken to continue to move the push for integrity along:

  • 1. The Jockey Club needs to incorporate microchips into the horse identification process, which would allow for more accurate record-keeping involving medical records. Concern about accuracy, according to those close to sales integrity process, has prevented them from requiring the disclosure of surgeries that alter conformation. If we're really serious about improving the health of the breed, such disclosures are important because when horses are bred, they will allow the breeders to make decisions that might reduce the severity of defects in future generations of racehorses. If The Jockey Club won't use microchips, then maybe the sale companies should require them in the horses they sell, beginning with a specific foal crop.

 

  • 2. Put the breeder of each horse on the sale catalog page, especially with weanlings, yearlings, and 2-year-olds, or put the information in an index in the catalog. People, who want it, can pay to get access to such information through various products. It's out there; make it available for free. Breeders' identifications aren't always apparent in the breeders' names given when foals are registered with The Jockey Club, but knowing the breeder of record at least gives the buyer a starting point. The fact that no one sought information from the voluntary ownership registry offered at the Fasig-Tipton Kentucky July select yearling sale doesn't mean it shouldn't be available. When I buy something, I don't always read all the information in or on the package, but it's there if I want to take a look.

 

 

  • 3. Keeneland and Fasig-Tipton need to start testing for exogenous anabolic steroids in sale 2-year-olds. The Ocala Breeders' Sales Co. already is doing it, and Barretts has committed to doing it in 2009.

Does anybody else have any ideas for improving sales integrity?

3 Comments:

These are good ideas that will improve upon the status quo.   Disclosure of medical records is one way to see if people actually practice what they preach and if there's nothing to hide it should not be a problem.   Testing for steroid use in preparation for the sale is not only to protect the horse but the buyers as well.

Ed Martin 25 Jul 2008 2:40 PM

I imagine it would take some doing but if there could be a registry of sorts, indexed to breeders by breakdowns.

When a horse breaks down, mark it in a database and put the breeder's name in.

I imagine full disclosure might not be what the breeders want but it should be available.

winston 26 Jul 2008 10:13 AM

What about banning Corticosteroids? Sure blocking anabolics are in fashion right now. people who want to ban anabolics, have never been on the backside. Horses rarely break down due to a blast of Winstrol or Equipose. But people tap and block horses with cortizone all the time and the joints deteriorate. I have seen trainers block every conceivable joint. Not sure what's wrong? Do his ankles, knees, everything! A 2 year old works in 10 at the sale, ankle fills up. What happens? The consigner taps him and he is good to sell. The buyer already has a horse with problems.

Barry 28 Jul 2008 4:26 PM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)