BloodHorse.com

Search Blood-Horse.com

When the Select Juvenile Market Becomes More Selective

The Blood-Horse MarketWatch’s May issue includes a review of the select 2-year-olds in training season, which fared worse than expected with an overall drop in rate of return for pinhooked horses. The ROR fell to 30% from 82% in the 2008. Now these statistics apply only to pinhooked horses, meaning those purchased previously at public auction as yearlings with the intent of reselling them as juveniles. MarketWatch leans heavily on pinhooking statistics to analyze the markets for the most obvious reason — the commercial market tells us what a horse is worth on either end of the process. Pinhooks also make up a substantial segment of the market. In the case of the select 2-year-old sales, pinhooked horses made up 64.3% of the 882 horses offered.

While the market was down overall, there was one slender segment that significantly outperformed all the others. These were the pinhooks purchased as yearlings for less than $20,000. Of the 35 horses in this price range offered, 60% were sold (21 horses) and 43% (15) were profitable. This group generated a 120% ROR for its consignors, an increase from 63% for the same price range in 2008. The horses were slightly more expensive as yearlings, averaging $14,048 compared with an average of $13,000 for the comparable group of 2008. The average price for this price range as 2-year-olds, however, spiked 39.7% to $74,286, up from $53,176 a year ago.

Another significant change occurred with pinhooks purchased in the $50,000-$74,999 yearling price range. The ROR for this group fell to 6% from 112% during the 2008 select seasons. The average 2-year-old price for this segment of the market dropped nearly 50% to $86,553 from $172,045 a year ago.

What happened with these two segments of the market may be related. Among the eight yearling price ranges MarketWatch uses to analyze the market, RORs were the highest for the bottom three — pinhooked horses that sold for $39,999 or less as yearlings. Buyers clearly had less money to spend and were shopping for bargains. This means less interest at the top and upper-middle segments of the market and more interest in the less expensive horses. More interest means more competition, which generally means higher prices. Eric Mitchell

6 Comments:

Well, when I see the success of Birdstone, Peace Rules, Northern Afleet, Yonaguska or Candy Ride and am able to buy a Musket Man, Mine That Bird, General Quarters there's no way I'm spending more...

da3hoss 26 May 2009 11:55 AM

The improvement for less than $20,000 yearlings finally makes sense . The value in that segment is clearly there . The more you pay for a weanling or yearling is no guarantee of success .

bernie 26 May 2009 12:51 PM

I agree, there is less money available in the horse market. Less money to spend however is not the only cause for buyer interest in the less expensive horse.

Interest in the less expensive end of the market by buyers is additionally caused by buyer awareness.

Awareness that the horse with minor imperfections can just as well be a champion, as the one who has looks to kill and "walks like a two dollar hooker".

Awareness that the stallions with a stud fee of $50,000 or less can and do have the same, (if not better), percentage of starters, winners, stakes wins, and graded stake wins, as those with a stud fee of $75,000 plus.

Awareness that one can afford more often to race again if all does not go right with a lower priced horse vs a higher priced horse.

Awareness that the higher priced stallions might have the winning foals of some classic races, but the underneath  percentage of winners, even runners making it to the track sometimes is lower then the bargain stallion. Also the possibility of a purse return equal or higher then cost is less likely with the higher priced stallion's progeny.

So yes, the economy is a factor. But buyer awareness (education) has slowly been growing, and will continue to grow and influence the market. This awareness being a factor long after the economy has rebounded.

Hey, even some of the million dollar buyers might get a thrill out of a bargain winner/champion. I mean mean that is only second best to raising your own.      

Kevin 26 May 2009 1:33 PM

If you monitor the horse sales over the past thirty years you will find they are in lockstep as a sign wave with economic downturns, much like the stock market.

Yes a good horse can come from anywhere, but try not to become too elated about the bottom end, If your looking to buy a Mercedes you had best leave the Hyundai lot.

TouchStone Farms 27 May 2009 9:13 AM

TouchStone Farms makes a good point. The pinhook returns for the lower-priced horses only means they sold well and does not mean they're bargain stakes winners.

You may question the wisdom of spending a million dollars or more on a horse, but you cannot get away from the fact that high-quality horses those with good pedigrees and good conformation should cost more money. And generally speaking, perform better than average on the track.

The January issue of The Blood-Horse MarketWatch included a a preview for the 2-year-olds in training sale season. On page 12 is chart with the aggregate performance records of sale graduates from eight major juvenile sales from 2001 through 2005. The Fasig-Tipton Calder sale had the highest average price ($253,855) but also the highest percentage of graded stakes winners (5.7%) from horses sold. The top three sales by percentage of stakes winners OBS February (13%) and Fasig-Tipton Calder and Barretts March (each with 11%) all had average prices that were six figures.

emitchell 27 May 2009 12:58 PM

I agree with TouchStone as to the economy reflecting the ups and downs of the horse market.

However, present day buyers who own to race are sophisticated, and have knowledge available to them that they did not have thirty years ago. This is the difference in the current downturn, that did not exist in the past that will effect future markets. Sellers of  thoroughbred horses, pinhooked or not, would be wise to deal with  this reality and act accordingly.

As for the Mercedes/Hyundai comparison with thoroughbreds! A worldly sounding, but meaningless analogy of smoke and mirrors that answers nothing but reveals a great deal.

Percentage figures of stake winners from various sales when not specific, but are given in average, do not impress or prove. Break the sale down. Show the highest price horses sold were the stake winners, then a point is made.

Recently, in Bloodhorse I read a statement from a person whose name for the moment I can not recall. He/she stated, "Price is what you pay, value is what you receive".

To conclude, if one spends a million dollars, or fifty thousand dollars, today's buyer is aware of the value.        

Kevin 28 May 2009 1:18 PM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)

MarketWatch Blog

Click Here to download BloodHorse.com Widgets!