BloodHorse.com

Search Blood-Horse.com

The Influence of Stallion Owners at Public Auctions

Stallion owners are typically active at public auction. The tremendous influence of the commercial market on breeding nowadays requires it. Nothing can damage a sire’s value more than letting a few low-priced horses slip through, driving down the average yearling price. To what extent this price protection occurs is speculation, but it does occur.

The recent Fasig-Tipton Saratoga select yearling sale included 11 purchases by buyers who have direct ties to the sires of the yearlings purchased. In fairness, all the sires were either young, fashionable stallions or proven sires with high-profile runners. The yearlings would have been attractive regardless of the connection. Let’s take the skeptic’s view, however, and accept that a buyer in these 11 incidences — which totaled $7,475,000 and averaged $679,545 — cannot be completely detached about the link between a sale horse’s value and a stallion’s value.

So what does the market look like if these horses are taken out of the mix? Not too bad, actually. The average for all 160 horses sold at the select Saratoga sale was $328,434, up 11.1% from 2008’s average. Taking out the purchases with obvious sire–buyer connections, the average falls to $302,513, which is still 2.29% higher than 2008’s average of $295,738. The median also stayed in the black, remaining at $250,000 compared with the 2008 median of $227,500.

It should be noted that a review of the 2008 Fasig-Tipton Saratoga sale revealed only two purchases with an obvious sire–buyer connection. Those purchases totaled $1,425,000 and averaged $712,500.

For the owners of select-quality yearlings, it should be encouraging to know a genuine demand exists for these horses, and a premium price is attainable even in the dour economic climate we’re in. It is a good omen, at least for the opening two days of the Keeneland September sale. — Eric Mitchell

10 Comments:

COULD WE have those 11 named somewhere

steve s 17 Aug 2009 1:35 PM

Very insightful and informative blog. Buyer beware .

bernie 17 Aug 2009 1:42 PM

Darley Medaglia doro and Bernardini, they bought several of their foals.

zipssecret 17 Aug 2009 3:36 PM

I think every stallion owner/syndicate should assume some obligation to purchase a few of their stallions progeny, especially from the first crop.  The approximate cost and number of individuals to be purchased should be figured into the stallions total projected expenditure (board,vet,marketing etc) before he starts his initial season.  Mare owners are making a commitment so there should be some level of the same in return.  You used to see this happen more a few years ago but it definitely occurs less often nowadays.  In place of that, I would like to see greater efforts made to help breeders sell their horses.  A lot of this responsibility lies with the bloodstock agent as that is how they earn their commission but again, syndicates should also be their stallions cheerleaders.

cah 17 Aug 2009 4:28 PM

Here's my caustic observation. Perhaps if the books weren't so large stallion owners wouldn't need to buy offspring.

Tiznowbaby 17 Aug 2009 7:39 PM

hope everyone is excited about the new stallion that's going to stud... he had a grand total of six lifetime starts...love these horses that had trouble staying sound...we should keep breeding to these horses and keep getting more of the same bad a** horses that are pretty but very fragile...

mauk one 17 Aug 2009 8:37 PM

These extremely dubious practises are even more profound in Australia ! Not only are the top yearlings 'sold' to those with connections, but often 'sold' directly back to the stud itself. It really is a joke, especially at major 'sales' here in Australia (2nd biggest T'bred breeder in the world)

adamalexander 17 Aug 2009 10:18 PM

CAH: If we had a choice between a world where stud connections bid up the prices of their stallions get (artificially inflating his value), and a world where stud connections were forbidden from bidding on their stallions get (possibly deflating his value), I would have to vote for the latter. Using profits from stud fees to bid up prices on yearlings, with the resulting higher averages being used to justify maintaining or raising an already questionable stud fee for the next batch of mare owners would be, to put it mildly, skating close to fraud.

Transparancy 18 Aug 2009 9:22 AM

Seems to me that the same thing happened with the Green Monkey, just more hidden.  jmo  

bflodave 18 Aug 2009 1:49 PM

It is usually pretty obvious on a sales result sheet, which horses are 'kickback' or 'bid up' individuals.  I am talking about the purchase of a few at fair market value to race.  Stallion syndicates are currently in a period of time that screams integrity and the 2009 season highlighted this when several stud fees were adjusted not once, but twice.  Hopefully lessons were learned from this and fair market value will be the norm.  It will be interesting to see if Darley raises Bernadini's fee next year.  If they are smart, they will set an example and leave the stud fee alone. The Jockey Club's prediction of only 30,000 foals in 2010 is another indicator of the market correcting itself.  As a result of this, syndicates may find themselves in a position where it is beneficial for them to buy a limited number of individuals instead of being able to rely on exorbitantly large books of mares to boost their earnings.  A couple of years ago Posse proved that you can top the list with half as many foals as others.  I was in high school when this market situation happened in the late eighties and I must admit it is frustrating and compelling to watch how it is all shaking out.  

cah 18 Aug 2009 2:25 PM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)

MarketWatch Blog

Click Here to download BloodHorse.com Widgets!