Is This a Broodmare?

Many guys will admit, if pressed, that within 30 seconds of meeting a new girl, they place her in one of two categories: a potential date or a possible friend.

I think most pedigree geeks do something similar when first encountering a new mare.  Is this a potential broodmare prospect?  Or is she better off in another career?

I'd like to start an occasional discussion about how we each answer those questions.  The best way I can think of is to look at a few actual mares and compare notes.  Today's model is a mare that is being offered at a "first bid" price for private sale.

On Tuesday, I stumbled across an online advertisement for a 5-year-old Thoroughbred mare. (See Surgeglobal's pedigree.) A quick look showed that her stats weren't especially impressive: one maiden claiming win from nine starts for earnings of $4,252. And while her sire was a graded winner of nearly $700,000, most of the names in this mare's pedigree don't jump off the page.

A bit more digging revealed that she has five full siblings:

    • Blazing Count, 1997 colt, stakes-placed winner of $397,432. 45 starts with 15 wins, 5 places, 9 shows
    • Brazen Count, 1998 colt, winner of $58,457. 34 starts with 4 wins, 6 places, 1 show
    • Dayzemaemade, 1999 filly, unraced
    • Blazing Countess, 2000 filly, winner of $245,971. 60 starts, 14 wins, 10 places, 11 shows (through July 13, 2008)
    • Count On Bill, 2002 gelding, winner of $163,311. 53 starts, 10 wins, 16 places, 7 shows (through June 23, 2008)

Of five full brothers and sisters, three are winners of $100,000+.  Not bad. 

There's also an unnamed/unraced 2001 Bianconi half-sister, a 2-year-old Minardi half-sister, and a 2007 Teton Forest (SRO) half-brother.  Looks like Surgeglobal's dam has earned the opportunity to visit a couple of good sires.

Unfortunately, there's not a whole lot of black type on the catalog page, though Surgeglobal's second dam was stakes-placed and was in the money 15 times from 42 starts.  Overall, the family seems to produce hard-knocking runners from out-of-the-mainstream sires.

All that for $1,000.

With these details in mind, I started to look at Surgeglobal in the light of a broodmare prospect.  Are her pluses (successful siblings with high "start" numbers that indicate sound stock) enough to overcome her negatives (commercially questionable bloodlines and a poor race record)?  In answering these questions, I assumed that the mare would pass my physical inspection without any major red flags. (Disclosure:  I traded emails with the mare's seller and was told that Surgeglobal "retired sound but does have a slightly crooked left front leg.") 

The conclusion I reached is that, if I were a stallion owner trying to prove a new stud, I'd love to have Surgeglobal in my herd. Or if I were training my own small stable of homebreds, I'd be eager to take a chance on her.  In either of those situations, I'd feel pretty confident that I'd get solid foals that would earn their oats -- and with the right cross, possibly even a stakes-quality runner. Surgeglobal doesn't fit into my current breeding program, but I see where she could be a good choice in different circumstances.

Any differing viewpoints?  If you like her, who would you cross her with?


Recent Posts


  • Pedigree Newsletter:
    The Five-Cross Files will be featured in a new Pedigree Analysis newsletter from To sign up for this free weekly email -- or any other newsletters from The Blood-Horse -- just click here.

Recommended Reading

More Blogs