BloodHorse.com

Search Blood-Horse.com

Hard to Give Away -- Barren Mares at Breeding Stock Sales

When BloodHorse.com carries a headline stating "Downward Spiral Continues" and reports that a fairly prominent auction was down over 66% in daily revenue, you know that the Thoroughbred bloodstock market is in an enormous funk.

I've been people-watching at the ongoing Keeneland January sale during its first few days. Sentiments are all over the board when it comes to the economy:  some think we'll see improvements by the time Fall sales roll around, others expect the downturn to last multiple years.  Many sellers believe that it's best to let their stock sell regardless of price, while others are forced to be content with an RNA -- and still others are pulling their horses out of the sale in record numbers.

Everyone I've met at the sale agrees on at least one thing, though:  one of the toughest segments of any breeding stock sale is barren mares, and this year it probably wasn't worth putting most of them through the ring.  Bidders just aren't interested.

I understand the reasoning -- if you're paying out a purchase price for a new mare, it's nice to think that she'll have a foal by her side soon that will be marketable, to recoup some or all of the mare's cost.  It's an additional "guarantee" that the mare is breeding-sound.  And perhaps the best reason of all, in many cases you're able to snag a deal that equates to a terrific discount on the stud fee (already paid by the current owner) of the carried foal.

In early 2009, future-thinking breeders should reconsider this bias against barren and open mares.  Here's why:

    • You won't have another mouth to feed -- or board/handling/training expenses -- that comes along with new foals.  Just upkeep for the mare.
    • The deals on stud fees in 2009 are likely to be the best ones you've ever seen.  We're looking at a significant drop-off in the number of Thoroughbred foals bred this coming breeding season, and almost any stud farm out there will be willing to deal with you to ensure that you don't bring your mare elsewhere. Think slashed fees, special incentives, and creative contracts that, for example, allow you to pay after the foal sells as a yearling.
    • With many breeders taking off a year in 2009, the 2010 foal crop should drop.  Maybe even a lot.  (My guess is we dip below 30,000 registered foals of 2010, the first sub-30,000 season since 1976). So, the foal you breed in 2009 will belong to the smallest foal crop in recent history. I said a while ago that this could lead to decreased competition and increased opportunity at the race track and promising commercial prospects. I'm even more convinced of it after hearing breeders' cut-back plans.
    • Your barren mare should have a stronger foal in 2010.  Researchers disagree on this one, but many prominent breeders over the years have treated the idea as gospel truth:  foals bred following a barren year for their dam tend to be stronger and sounder than foals born to mares that have had a long string of foals.  Physiologically, it makes sense:  a mare that's had a year off to recuperate and restore will be stronger herself, and will pass on extra nutrients to her carried foal. 
    • The purchase prices are unbeatable.  Many well-bred mares are going through the auction ring without even attracting an opening bid; others are selling for 1/3 of their value from a year ago.  Some sellers are in a panic about the market and are making rash decisions to "dump" their horses -- others are actually forced economically to bail out at "fire sale" prices.

By the way... yes, I've added a barren mare to my small herd this year.  Yes, I'll be breeding her in 2009.  In fact, I'm breeding to race, banking on the idea that a good runner in the foal crop of 2010 will have increased opportunity.  The whole Thoroughbred industry is based on risk-taking.  The troubled economy we see today presents new risks -- but it also affords new prospects if you're willing to seek them out.

 

16 Comments:

Your projected decline in the 2010 foal crop is a reasonable conclusion, however I strongly disagree with that being a rationale for breeding a mare into that crop.  First, the number of foals in the crop has no bearing on the actual racing ability of your foal. The ratio of stakes winners, allowance winners etc. will remain the same.  Further, a one year decline in mares bred will have a miniscule impact on field size unless racing in 2yo races (maybe 3 starts if you are lucky) or the limited 3yo races (only after you break your maiden which are ordinarily 3/4 year old affairs).  Such a decline would need to be sustained over multiple years to have any impact on your horses.  Thus it may make sense in say 2012 to breed this barren mare.  Its like the sales being run at retail stores trying to encourage buyers.  Just because something is 80% off doesn't mean you should buy it...it is still the same product you didn't want 6 months ago...You are effectively saying it is worth breeding because you have slightly increased your chance of picking up 5th place money instead of 6th...

  • Scot's reply:  Good perspective.  I should also probably say: I've been planning for a couple of years to breed in 2009, and I'm following through despite the economic climate.  That said, I actually do foresee a couple of years of decreased foal production -- and think that it will impact the sport in the coming years.  Sure, the foals born might not be any more talented than they would be if they were in a larger crop... but they ARE more likely to be accepted into the stable of a better trainer (who's looking to fill a thinner barn), and they DO have a better chance at black type races, just by relativity.  If 3,000 horses from each year's crop are going to run in stakes races, I would rather have one of a crop of 27,000 (1-in-9 chance) than a foal from a large crop of, say, 36,000 (1-in-12 chance).

 

Lohnro 14 Jan 2009 6:04 PM

Congratulations on the new addition to the family, but don't leave us hanging!  Give us a pedigree at least!  

  • Scot's reply:  *grin*  Thanks for the interest!  I will actually hold off on her identity until I discuss my mating choices a bit later in the breeding season... however, I will say that she's a decidedly UNcommercial mare from the 1-x (La Troienne) family and carries both In Reality and Olden Times.  More coming....
Dreamer's Mom 14 Jan 2009 6:48 PM

The part about having a stronger foal after a mare is "dry" for a year makes perfect sense.

Broodmares are either nursing or pregnant. After she has her newborn foal, most mares are bred again during "foal heat' which occurs when her newborn is just 7-9 days old! Her body can't help losing condition and nutrients over time, even with the best feed and care.

Giving her some time off gives her a chance to get back condition and rebuild lost nutrients.

Resulting in a healther and more robust foal.

Beth 14 Jan 2009 7:49 PM

I have always believed in giving a mare off between foals as the foal following the barren year will benefit from the mare's own renewed strength and will not be competing for calcium and nutrients from the foal nursing at her side. Purchasing a barren mare is not that huge an issue for me.

Julie L. 14 Jan 2009 8:31 PM

My decidedly UNcommercial mare produced a stakes winner, so who knows?  I wasn't looking for her exact identity, just curious "where she comes from" so to speak.  I know more about where my horses come from than I do my own 2-legged pedigree!  

Not that it matters, but I do like the In Reality!

Dreamer's Mom 14 Jan 2009 8:45 PM

If it happens, a decline from 36,000 to 27,000 will present an unprecedented opportunity to test breeding theories.  You suggest your chance for a stakes winner goes from 1 in 12 to 1 in 9.  This assumes an equal decline in the foals sired by every stallion.  If Giant's Causeway's book doesn't decline, or least not proportionate to the foal crop, I would argue he will have an increase in the % of SW's sired.  Whereas a sire with a lower strike rate of SW will see a decline in that percentage disproportionate to his decline in book, because that sire will have fewer runners and they will be running against a constant historical level of better sired horses. Afterall, mares taken out of production will be those at the lower end of the market. That is will the rich get richer? It will be very interesting to see how this all plays out, and the insights it may provide for measuring the true performance of a stallion.  

Lohnro 14 Jan 2009 8:48 PM

I AM LOOKING TO BUY A GOOD YEARLING, AND EVEN 3-4 MARES TO BREED. THIS MAKES A LOT OF SENSE. I FEEL LIKE NOW IS THE TIME TO BUY. WITH THE MARKET DOWN LIKE THIS YOU CAN PICK UP SOME REALLY GOOD DEALS

CAJUNCOCKER 14 Jan 2009 10:37 PM

From what I've seen of the sale, the mares that are taking the hardest hit aren't necessarily the barren mares, it's the mares that have several foals that have gotten to the races (or are old enough that they should have gotten to the races) and don't have at least one good solid winner with black type out there.  I think the perception is that these mares are culls, and people are reluctant to take someone's cull.  Based on what I've seen, the current market is punishing the mare with a mediocre or bad produce record, even if she's in foal, worse than the young mare who is barren or not bred.  

Karin C-C 15 Jan 2009 1:29 AM

Interesting stuff!  The name La Troienne rings a bell!  Anything to do with Brigadier Gerard?  i may be wrong as my memory can be patchy!!!!

I too think it is good to give mares a year off from time to time.  Racehorses are not machines and neither are broodmares or stallions!  i object strongly to stallions covering huge books of mares and wish legislation could be brought in to prevent this!!!!!  If i had a stallion he would cover a max of 70 mares a season!

God Bless

Best wishes

Abbie

Abbie Knowles 15 Jan 2009 3:50 AM

I am one of those that feels it will be a couple years before the market makes significant improvement.  Because of that, I am looking to foal share the majority of my mares and not breed some of them this year.  I have considered adding a young mare to my herd, but I'd probably buy the best bred weanling or yearling filly that I could afford to buy.  By the time she'd be old enough to breed, the market hopefully will be better and I would have improved the bloodlines of my herd.  I agree that you can pick up a nice barren mare for less than normal this year. She'd have to be as good as or better than my best mare for me to consider buying and breeding another mare for 09.

catnip lane 15 Jan 2009 7:40 AM

If the money was available in my pocket, 2009 would be the ideal year for me to get into the sport.

I would buy a couple well bred mares and breed them to either the most proven at their reduced fees or even save more money on the similar lined less expensive alternatives. The market correction and "on sale" like atmosphere is the perfect opportunity.

I would totally find a mare that would fit Rock Hard Ten pedigree wise, purchase her and point the foal to race with the 2010 crop...just because Im a Rock Hard Ten fan.

Breeders should really go after business men/women who have always been interested in entering the sport.

aspradling 15 Jan 2009 1:35 PM

There were 2 mares on the sale that were "family" to our stallion that I watched-both brought in the $30,000-$32,000 range and I was thrilled to see them bring that kind of money.  One was in foal and the other a broodmare prospect.  Nice mares with solid pedigrees.

This sale makes me re-think my breeding operation, though.  We could have taken a trailer or two down and loaded up on young horses for $1000 each.  Way cheaper than raising them, for sure.  Not nearly as satisfying, but money talks right now.  

Dreamer's Mom 15 Jan 2009 5:52 PM

I about cried that the dam of Read the Footnotes went through for $1,000 (RNA).  Yes, she was not in foal, as listed, and hadn't produced a foal in two years, but that doesn't mean she's hopeless or worthless!  She's 19. I just hope she ends up as a happy, healthy lawn ornament.  I can't stand these people who just put down (as in "snuff") these grand old mares like they have no value.  Princess Rooney stopped producing, but was a great baby-sitter.  People need to think outside the box with these older, barren mares.

LittleGuyBreeder 15 Jan 2009 7:02 PM

I agree with you barren mares a extreamly cheap and anyone willing to give them a chance could get some excellent pedigrees for a bargin.  Island Fashion's full sister only went for $10,000. If I didn't have a field full of horses I would have been their.

hardlyhatful 15 Jan 2009 7:14 PM

The fact that the market for horses is clearly off 50% or more but the Stud Farms have only cut fees 10-15 (20% at most)says a lot about the arrogance or myopic view of this Industry many have.

The rate of return for a commercial offering is down significantly yet, few do anything about it while simultaneously lamenting the lack of good mares to breed.

While I'm not a fan of the commercial merry-go-round it does seem to be an obvious and important segment of the market. How in the world can these top Stallion farms be so intellectually/factually oblivious to the new realities of life!?!?

I'll not breed another mare until the stud fees come down another 25% or more.

C Bea 15 Jan 2009 7:49 PM

We breed in KY and sell NY breds and board mares. Our business is busy as owners want to cash in on the NY programs owner and breeder awards but we still have a newly 2 year old filly by Include and gelding by Yonaguska that seem hard to sell due to the market. They are gorgeous and nicely bred but everyone is cutting back on numbers of horses. Hard to blame them! We don't know if we should breed all our mares or not this year. The stud farms will have to come down more than they have on fees to entice me - because the cost of raising them right just keeps going up!

NYFarmowner/breeder 16 Jan 2009 1:01 PM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)

The Five-Cross Files

News

  • Pedigree Newsletter:
    The Five-Cross Files will be featured in a new Pedigree Analysis newsletter from BloodHorse.com. To sign up for this free weekly email -- or any other newsletters from The Blood-Horse -- just click here.
Click Here to download BloodHorse.com Widgets!