Home

0688228
Ratings Generated in 2013
Featured Stallion

The Sadler's Wells/Mill Reef Nick

Readers: I'm curious to get your analysis of the Sadler's Wells/Mill Reef nick. Why do you think this nick works?

Avalyn Hunter ends her Mahubah's Corner column this week with a look at the combination of Sadler's Wells/Mill Reef:

"…Irish Derby runner-up Midas Touch stayed on very well through the stretch and according to jockey Colm O’Donoghue may be a live prospect for the St. Leger. By Galileo out of Approach, by Darshaan, his pedigree is an example of a cross that has worked very well for Sadler’s Wells, that of Sadler’s Wells over mares carrying Mill Reef. A cross that automatically doubles up on 1955 Kentucky Oaks winner Lalun, dam of Bold Reason (damsire of Sadler’s Wells) and Never Bend (sire of Mill Reef), it has accounted for more than 100 graded/group winners sired by Sadler’s Wells and his sons, headed by champions and highweights High Chaparral, Universal Prince, Beat Hollow, In the Wings, and Islington."

But how much should we credit the doubling of Lalun? Scot Gillies of Blood-Horse Publications, and author of The Five-Cross Files, has this to say on the subject:

"Way too much credit (and blame) is assigned to single-ancestor inbreeding in general. At anything beyond 3 x 3 or possibly 3 x 4, I'm going to consider a duplication of one sire or dam to be a moderate influence at best.

"I don't hear anyone shouting about the Lady Josephine angle, yet her 9-c family is all over the Sadler's Wells/Mill Reef cross. Or Nasrullah, for that matter, who appears about as close as Lalun.

"If Sadler's Wells progeny from mares that had an instance of Lalun were hitting at 18 or 20% [stakes winners to foals], I'd be looking closely for what else was present in those crosses.

"Here's what I think is going on: Sadler's Wells and Mill Reef clicked with the same kinds of mares – they threw similar builds and lots of stamina. But they were separated by a generation, so Mill Reef daughters not only were out of mares that Sadler's Wells would've done well with (and were even moved one step closer conformationally and aptitudinally to Sadler's Wells because of Mill Reef), but they also were the right age to be booked to Sadler's Wells. Sending like to like – at the highest class, when the individuals are already top-notch runners from top-notch families – is the best Brit breeding strategy of the last 150+ years.

"Insert A.P. Indy or Street Cry into the equation and put Sadler's Wells below; they don't match up quite as well physically, but the results look promising internationally, with Music Note, Whobegotyou, and Arranca El Sol [Chilean champion 2-year-old colt]."

Filed under: ,

4 Comments:

One thing that is generally overlooked is that Bold Reason (broodmare sire of Sadler's Wells) is actually a little more closely related to Never Bend than just being a half-brother. Bold Reason is by a grandson of Royal Charger, where Never Bend is by Nasrullah, a three-parts-brother to Royal Charger.

So now you've got a little genetic unit, and that tends to bring other affinities with it. With Sadler's Wells you have Fair Trial and a three-parts-sister (Riot), and they are both from the same male and female line as Royal Charger and Nasrullah.

For reasons too complex to go into here Son-in-Law/Gallinule (in Fair Trial and the three-parts-sister) is good with Blue Larkspur (twice in Bold Reason) and Frizette's female line (closely doubled in Djeddah, the sire of Lalun).

You probably get some relatively similar and complimentary aptitudes and biomechanics, with the gene groupings bringing some physiological goodies.

This would tend to be why it's worked over a number of generations and both ways round.

Of course, it's not invariably successful, as Montjeu for one has some other stronger preferences.

Alan Porter 02 Jul 2010 6:29 PM

Really great stuff, Scot, and Alan's points are well taken. This type of analysis, while important, is voiced too infrequently. It points out a need for humility when pondering potential matings...No easy answers for this one-the significance of Lalun's contribution to the successful Sadler's Wells-Mill Reef nick. I'll contribute a few more thoughts:

I always viewed Sadler's Wells' Lalun contribution with some skepticism. Bold Reason was a fairly good racehorse, but a poor sire. He would appear to be one of the weaker influences in Sadler's Wells' pedigree. His dam, Fairy Bridge (Bold Reason-Special) was a quite talented runner. Most then (and in retrospect) would have attributed the lion's share of Fairy Bridge's racing talent to Special and to her family. Nureyev, for one, adds more evidence to this belief. Also, since Bold Reason was a poor sire, it seems more likely that his brand of Lalun was less than exceptional. None of this, however, is said with much certainty. Had Bold Reason also been a mediocre runner the argument would seem somewhat stronger. Even this portion of the analysis is far more complex than space allows here. For one, there is the issue of both Sadler's Wells' and Mill Reef's possession of very positive Lalun alleles vs together their "forming" a fortuitous gene complex (ex.-that may have worked so well for the top racemare Lalun herself---we can't forget that Lalun was both a very talented racehorse, and a superior producer). This is just an example...Scot does raise a worthy point about the Lady Josephine linebreeding. *Forli, who was inbred to Lady Juror, did certainly excell with Bold Ruler-*Nasrullah-so *Nasrullah's "brand" of Lady Josephine seemed to compliment well Forli's "brand" of this mare. I'm less taken with the like-to-like theory. For me, Mill Reef and Sadler's Wells were not too similar conformationally. I did see Mill Reef close up (got a good look at him at the '71 Arc), and have seen countless photos of Sadler's Wells. Mill Reef was far more refined and compact. I also doubt that conformational nicks make it beyond one generation...Yes, the Sadler's Wells-Mill Reef nick could be caused by several factors. Or, the Lalun inbreeding/linebreeding could be the major contributor. A very careful and thorough analysis might point to the more likely answer. I believe, though, that even with use of the most sophisticated programs/mathematics, etc., we would still be left with much uncertainty.

sceptre 03 Jul 2010 7:28 PM

With discussion of the doubling of Lalun, there is a current example of this inbreeding relative to the trail to the Kentucky Derby in 2012.  Lucky Chappy just ran in the El Camino Real Derby and finished 2nd by a nostril to Daddy Nose Best in a ten horse field. In examining the finish of the 1 1/8 Mile race, Julien Leparoux was appropriately using the whip to get the most of the final strides.  In contrast, Alan Garcia was following stride for stride with a two-handed hand-ride.  If Graham Motion makes a significant jockey change and can get J. Velasquez or another experienced jockey in the reigns, he has a shot at winning the Derby two years in a row.  Then we can haggle over who gets the credit.  Is it Graham Motion, the doubling of Lalun or is Lucky Chappy just plain Lucky?  Guess what.  This weekend you can place a couple of bucks on Lucky Chappy at Wynn's Kentucky Derby Future Wager at 100-1.  I know I will. We have to ask ourselves "Do you feel Lucky? Well do you?"

Anthony Moreno 27 Feb 2012 10:41 PM

There is an Austrlaian horse nearing champ status (certainly a 2yo champ) called Pierro who has Lalun all over him 5 or 6 generations back on the female side and once on the sire side (he's by Octagonal). Any comments on the Lalun influence, if any?

Steve 27 Mar 2013 5:21 AM

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated and must be approved before they are posted. The blog author reserves the right to edit or omit any comment.

  (Appears with your comment) (required)
  (Will not be published) (required)
  (required)